User talk:TG-article

Redirects

Please stop creating so many unnecessary redirects. Johannnes89 (talk) 16:19, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

If the redirects I created were unnecessary, then I can stop. – TG-ARTICLE (talk) 17:18, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Please also stop adding redundant contents into translation pages. It creates unnecessary work for translators to re-vet the pages when the content/meaning of it doesn't change. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 13:29, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

What makes you think they are redundant? – TG-ARTICLE (talk) 13:33, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

I'd like to remind you of this again. Stop adding unnecessary content to pages that doesn't change the meaning of the sentence. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 01:21, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

The reason was already given above, your changes are unnecessary and creates more work for translators. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 01:44, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

ok. – TG-ARTICLE (talk) 01:45, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

I need an idea for concept art in my new series. I'm starting it today, so I'll need ideas ASAP.

I hope this didn't distract you too much from anything you're doing right now. Sorry for the unexpected heads-up. Lemon-Iced-Tea (talk) 13:36, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

You've already asked this to four users already. – TG-ARTICLE (talk) 16:34, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing Meta for 2 weeks due to abuse of editing privileges. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, and privacy violations are considered vandalism, and will not be tolerated. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. If you believe the block was placed in error, you may place an unblock request on your talk page using {{unblock|reasons for unblock here}}. //shb (t • c) 03:47, 7 March 2025 (UTC) Unblock tools: block log • gblock log • blocklist • stalktoy • guc • unblock • gunblock • contribs: +/-

Last month you were warned about creating a whole heap of unnecessary redirects and redundant content onto translation pages. The latter of which if I may say you rather rudely responded to Minorax. If that wasn't already enough to constitute as disruptive editing, earlier today you filed a whole heap of requests onto SRG for users whose disruption was limited to enwiki which later had to be declined. Given how close all three of these incidents were (within a month), I really urge you to take the next two weeks off Meta and read what Meta-Wiki is for – please also take a look into what exactly warrants a report on SRG and what doesn't instead of filing about a dozen requests. But in the meantime, the amount of disruption you've caused well exceeds what's tolerated for someone who is blocked on another wiki. //shb (t • c) 03:47, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Unblock request

Unblock request declined This blocked user has had their unblock request reviewed by one or more administrators, who has/have reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Request reason: I was first accused of sockpuppetry in January 2025. However, that is false information. I never owned the account UDEXTG, nor did I use it for block evasion on Wikipedia. Further information: On January 24, 2025, I was blocked from editing the English Wikipedia by Canterbury Tail. The reason given for the block was Disruptive editing: And edit warring. This was not the first time I was blocked from editing Wikipedia. The expiration time of the block was set to 1 week. However, it did not last that long. This is because on January 25, 2025, the day after the block, an account (UDEXTG) was claimed as a sockpuppet by Aviationwikiflight. This is because the nature of the account's edits were suspiciously similar to mine, and Aviationwikiflight thought that it was an alternative account used for block evasion. Information about this can be found here. Canterbury Tail later on responded to the comment, and blocked both me and UDEXTG with no expiry set. On January 27, 2025, I filed an appeal for my block, and on January 28, my unblock request was reviewed by PhilKnight, who declined the request because of the standard offer and told me to wait for six months. Because I was blocked from editing Wikipedia, I started editing other wikis, such as this wiki, Wikimedia Commons, Wikidata, Wikibooks, and much more. However, I was indefinitely blocked from editing Commons and Wikidata in March because Stepro accused me of sockpuppetry as well. On April 1, 2025, I was blocked by EPIC due to machine translations and sockpuppetry. I do not own alternative accounts: just because UDEXTG's edits were similar to mine does not mean that I own the account. – TG-ARTICLE (talk) 22:58, 1 April 2025 (UTC) Decline reason: To request an unblock on the English Wikipedia, you will need to contact them. You can use their system at w:en:WP:UTRS. — xaosflux Talk 14:57, 2 April 2025 (UTC) @Xaosflux: I assume they are referring to the block on this wiki and that a local unblock here at Meta is what is being requested, though being the blocking admin I won't really get involved into this. EPIC (talk) 15:01, 2 April 2025 (UTC) I originally thought so, but their long story above is mostly about things on enwiki; which is completely out of scope. If this user wants to appeal their block on this wiki, they can open a new request - and explain why we should unblock them on this project. I do suggest that dealing with their homewiki should be deal with first. If they become a constructive contributor on their homewiki again, I'd reconsider the gblock. — xaosflux Talk 15:05, 2 April 2025 (UTC) The reason why I was blocked is because of what happened on enwiki. For context, there was an account named UDEXTG. People thought that it was a sockpuppet. However, it was not. That's why the block reason is related to enwiki rather than Meta-Wiki. – TG-ARTICLE (talk) 18:31, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

block log gblock log blocklist stalktoy guc unblock gunblock contribs: +/-