Jump to content


From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
This page is a translated version of the page Wikidentify and the translation is 100% complete.
This is a proposal for a new Wikimedia sister project.
Status of the proposal
ReasonThis can be done by Wikidata, once phab:T154426 is resolved.--GZWDer (talk) 06:16, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Details of the proposal
Project descriptionidentify objects on earth
Is it a multilingual wiki?one mulitilingual wiki
Potential number of languagesmany
Interested participants
See below.

Wikidentify könnte ein Projekt sein, mit welchen man Objekte der Erde identifizieren könnte, wie wir es von de:Bestimmungsschlüsseln in der Botanik kennen. Es könnte mehrere parallele Wege geben, Dinge zu bestimmen. Die Grundlage könnte Wikidata sein, sodass am Ende der Wikipedia-Artikel erscheint. Du kannst Einschlussverfahren, Ausschlussverfahren und aufeinander aufbauende Eigenschaften kombinieren.


  • Du wählst gelb, Diesel und schließt Pritsche aus und bekommst ein Auto geliefert, welches nur in dieser Farbe und mit den Optionen produziert wurde.
  • Du wählst eine Höhe, einen Ort und die Eigenschaft Baum, welcher im Schatten wächst und bekommst drei Arten, welche darauf zutreffen.
  • Du wählst ein Gewicht, eine Farbe und drumherum befindliche Details und bekommst als Antwort, dass es sich um eine Frucht eines Apfelbaumes handeln könnte.
  • Du wählst eine Lautstärke und das Land in dem du dich befindest, sowie die Anzahl der Propeller und bekommst den Flugzeugtyp.
  • ...

Vorgeschlagen von

Alternative Namen

  • Wikidentification – All other WMF projects are nouns.

Verwandte Projekte/Vorschläge


Links zu Maillisten

  • not yet


Interessierte Personen

Ablehnende Personen

  1. This sounds like something to be implemented in WikiData; we don't need another sister project. Chris Troutman (talk) 01:33, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Maybe sounds, but is more complex (just take the GUI). There are thinkings from experts necessary I think. Conny (talk) 13:40, 1 August 2013 (UTC).[reply]
  2. I agree with Chris that this should be seen as a WikiData tool. I support its creation, but I don't see the need for a separate wiki for that. --Piotrus (talk) 03:57, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Hm ok, maybe a seperate skin for Wikidentify is enough, if there is a way to integrate special needs like Klaas mentioned. Hope you opposers read discussion from specialists f. e. in german wikipedia (linked) and support overload of data for items to identify then. Maybe not everyone is interested in Wikidentify, but so this people maybe become the information overload in Wikidata... Thanks, Conny (talk) 09:43, 20 August 2013 (UTC).[reply]
  3.  Klaas|Z4␟V09:13, 18 August 2013 (UTC) Agree with Chris. Great task for an advanced tool in WikiData perhaps even a special namespace there, I suggest to move this proposal to a suitable team of developers there.[reply]
  4. Wikidata will be doing this. comment on why this project would be needed in addition to the current plans for Wikidata because I fail to see the need for this in addition to the current plans. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:06, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Weak oppose based on current scope. It makes sense to create dichotomous key to identify biological species but adding others into the scope makes it a bit too broad. (Ok, I can see that niche audiences like aviation fans would potentially treat this site as the go-to source to identify aircraft types but I want to see more listed in the proposal on how to carry out its goal.) OhanaUnitedTalk page 19:18, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  6. This would be a great add-on to Wikidata, but it's hard to see how a separate project is needed. -- Ypnypn (talk) 18:04, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  7. I hope that Wikidata will offer such a tool, eventually. — Ivan Shmakov (dc) 09:05, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  8. As proposed, I don't see a use for this. Sven Manguard (talk) 22:50, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Completely duplicate with query feature of Wikidata.--GZWDer (talk) 14:04, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]