Wikimedia Blog/Drafts/TOU update 2014/id

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
This page is a translated version of the page Wikimedia Blog/Drafts/TOU update 2014 and the translation is 35% complete.

This was a draft for a blog post that has since been published at https://blog.wikimedia.org/2014/06/16/change-terms-of-use-requirements-for-disclosure/

Membuat perubahan pada ketentuan penggunaan: Persyaratan untuk pengungkapan

Pada hari ini, kami membuat perubahan penting untuk ketentuan pengguna kami. Perubahan ini akan mengklarifikasi dan memperkuat larangan terhadap penyembunyian suntingan berbayar pada seluruh proyek Wikimedia

Separuh dari masyarakat menggunakan Wikipedia setiap bulannya sebagai sumber pengetahuan mereka. Komunitas penyunting Wikipedia bekerja tidak kenal lelah dalam mempertahankan ketepatan, transparansi, dan objektivitas dari artikel-artikel yang ada, yang dimana dibutuhkan indentifikasi terhadap konflik kepentingan dan menghapus segala prasangka yang keliru. Menyunting dengan bayaran dapat menjadi sumber prasangka keliru tersebut, khususnya ketika hasil suntingan cenderung berbau promosi atau kepentingan dari sang klien pembayar. Wikimedia Foundation telah berkomitmen untuk terus mendukung usaha dari komunitas Wikipedia untuk menjaga artikel-artikel bebas dari konten yang bersifat promosi.

Apa yang berubah?

Perubahan ini menambah sebuah subbab pada bab ke 4, Refraining from Certain Activities pada "Kontributor berbayar tanpa Pengungkapan." Dewan Pembina dari Wikimedia Foundation telah issued a letter yang menjelaskan perubahan tersebut. Kami juga memiliki prepared an FAQ yang membantu menjelaskan bagaimana perubahan berlaku dalam contoh-contoh yang spesifik. Kami menghimbau para pengguna untuk membaca seluruh pembaruan, surat, dan FAQ, namun beberapa poin yang terpenting adalah:

Sen gönüllü olarak düzenlemek ve eğlenmek için geldin, hiçbir şey değiştirmez. Düzenlemeye devam et lütfen! Gönüllüler ücretsiz bilgi benzeri görülmemiş bir kaynak bütün dünyanın kullanımına katkıda bulunmak için harika bir topluluğun parçasısın.

  • If you are employed by a gallery, library, archive, museum (GLAM), or similar institution that may pay employees to make good faith contributions in your area of expertise and not about your institution, you are also welcome to edit! The FAQ provides more guidance on when you should provide disclosure.
  • If you are paid to edit, you will need to disclose your paid editing to comply with the new Terms of Use. You need to add your affiliation to your edit summary, user page, or talk page, to fairly disclose your perspective. You’ll want to read the FAQ to learn more.
  • If you are paid to edit, other rules beyond the Terms of Use may also apply. Specific policies on individual Wikimedia projects, or relevant laws in your country (such as those prohibiting fraudulent advertising), may require further disclosure or prohibit paid advocacy editing altogether. Details on the legal issues and risk associated with undisclosed paid advocacy editing may be found in this FAQ.
  • Individual Wikimedia projects may discuss and implement alternative disclosure policies appropriate to their particular needs, as explained at greater length in the FAQ.

Neden değişiklik yapıyoruz?

açıklandığı Ekim 2013, inandığımız açıklanmayan ödenen avukatlık düzenleme bir siyah şapka uygulama bu tehdit edebileceğini güven Wikimedia gönüllüleri ve okurları. Böyle bir düzenleme Vikipedi'nin tarafsızlık ve güvenilirliği etkileyen şekliyle ilgili ciddi endişelerimiz var.

Kullanım Şartlarını değiştirme çeşitli şekillerde bu endişelere son verecek. İlk olarak, hareket ve misyon ruhuyla düzenlemek için, onların ilişkisi basit açıklama ile devam ediyorlar, nasıl ve inanç iyi editörler yetiştirmek açıklar. İkinci olarak, ek bir inceleme alması gereken düzenlemeleri belirlemek yardımcı olarak bilinçli bir şekilde ele toplum ödenen düzenleme sorunu güçlendirmek olacaktır. Son olarak, çıkar çatışmaları ile ilgili mevcut kuralları uygulamak için toplum Vakfı için başka bir araç sağlayacak ve düzenleme ödedi.

How did we make the change?

The Terms of Use sets out rules for how nearly half a billion monthly users engage with Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects. The current Terms of Use are the result of an extensive community collaboration in 2011.

We periodically review the Terms to ensure they are responsive to changes in the law and on the Wikimedia projects. To address community and Board concerns about paid editing, the Foundation proposed an amendment to the existing Terms of Use in February of this year. The Terms of Use already prohibited "deceptive activities," such as misrepresentation, impersonation, and fraud. The original proposal was intended to help ensure compliance with these rules by requiring any users who “receive or expect to receive” direct compensation for their edits to disclose their employer, client, and affiliation.

Throughout February and March, the Wikimedia community extensively discussed the issue of undisclosed paid editing, resulting in 320,000 words of discussion in various languages and 6.3 million views of the proposal. The discussion was overwhelmingly supportive of the change. It also provided constructive criticisms that helped refine the amendment, and led us to improve our planned FAQ to provide more context and better examples.

At the meeting of the WMF Board of Trustees in April, members of the Board reviewed the change and results of the public consultation. After their discussion, they approved the amendment. The Wikimedia Foundation will continue to monitor the effectiveness of the amendment, and remain open to changes as necessary to improve it.

What happens next?

This change is effective immediately. We are notifying all users with banner messages on all Wikimedia projects.

If you have any comments, or would like to discuss this change further, please join the conversation on the Meta talk page for the Terms of Use.

Thanks everyone who has contributed to the discussion on this important issue. Your concerns elevated and clarified the issue in a manner that helped improve the original proposed amendment. Your input and feedback ensured a strong, yet appropriate, policy that we expect will strengthen the projects overall.

Stephen LaPorte, Legal Counsel

Luis Villa, Deputy General Counsel

Geoff Brigham, General Counsel