Wikimedia Blog/Drafts/TOU update 2014/nl
This was a draft for a blog post that has since been published at https://blog.wikimedia.org/2014/06/16/change-terms-of-use-requirements-for-disclosure/
Wijziging van onze gebruiksvoorwaarden: Eisen voor openbaarmaking
Vandaag maken we een belangrijke verandering aan onze gebruiksvoorwaarden. Deze verandering zal het verbod tegen het verbergen van betaalde veranderingen op alle Wikimedia projecten versterken en duidelijk maken.
Maandelijks gebruiken half een miljard mensen Wikipedia als bron van kennis. Wikipedia's editor gemeenschap werkt onvermoeibaar om de nauwkeurigheid en objectiviteit van artikelen te onderhouden, die het identificeren van belangenconflicten en wegnemen van vooroordelen vereist. Editing-voor-betaling kan een bron van zulke belangenconflicten zijn, vooral wanneer de veranderingen commercieel zijn, of door de interesse van een geintereseerde klant. De Wikimedia Foundation steunt de Wikipedia editor gemeenschap's inspanningen om de artikelen vrij te maken van commerciele inhoud.
Wat verandert er?
This change adds a new subsection to Section 4, Refraining from Certain Activities, on “Paid Contributions without Disclosure.” The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has issued a letter explaining the change. We have also prepared an FAQ that helps explain how the change applies in specific instances. We encourage you to read the full update, letter, and FAQ, but the most important points are:
- Als je vrijwillig veranderingen aanbrengt, verandert er niets. Blijf alstublieft editen! Je maakt deel uit van een geweldige gemeenschap van vrijwilligers die bijdragen aan een weergaloze bron van gratis informatie, beschikbaar voor de hele wereld.
- If you are employed by a gallery, library, archive, museum (GLAM), or similar institution that may pay employees to make good faith contributions in your area of expertise and not about your institution, you are also welcome to edit! The FAQ provides more guidance on when you should provide disclosure.
- Individual Wikimedia projects may discuss and implement alternative disclosure policies appropriate to their particular needs, as explained at greater length in the FAQ.
Why are we making a change?
As explained in October of 2013, we believe that undisclosed paid advocacy editing is a black hat practice that can threaten the trust of Wikimedia’s volunteers and readers. We have serious concerns about the way that such editing affects the neutrality and reliability of Wikipedia.
How did we make the change?
Throughout February and March, the Wikimedia community extensively discussed the issue of undisclosed paid editing, resulting in 320,000 words of discussion in various languages and 6.3 million views of the proposal. The discussion was overwhelmingly supportive of the change. It also provided constructive criticisms that helped refine the amendment, and led us to improve our planned FAQ to provide more context and better examples.
At the meeting of the WMF Board of Trustees in April, members of the Board reviewed the change and results of the public consultation. After their discussion, they approved the amendment. The Wikimedia Foundation will continue to monitor the effectiveness of the amendment, and remain open to changes as necessary to improve it.
What happens next?
This change is effective immediately. We are notifying all users with banner messages on all Wikimedia projects.
Thanks everyone who has contributed to the discussion on this important issue. Your concerns elevated and clarified the issue in a manner that helped improve the original proposed amendment. Your input and feedback ensured a strong, yet appropriate, policy that we expect will strengthen the projects overall.
Stephen LaPorte, Legal Counsel
Luis Villa, Deputy General Counsel
Geoff Brigham, General Counsel