Wikimedia CEE Hub/Microgrants/report/Filling the Gaps – Part Two
- By: ShahenWasHere
The project consisted of a structured three-weekend online edit-a-thon focused on critical missing topics identified by community feedback and analytics. Organizers provided ongoing support, coordinated communications, and maintained a curated list of essential articles to guide editors. Participants from Armenia and the diaspora actively contributed throughout the event. To encourage consistent engagement, we offered small prizes for top contributors while prioritizing quality over quantity.
Outcomes and metrics:
- Newly created articles: 150+
- Substantially improved articles: 260+
- Total essential articles impacted: 400+
- Active editors (15–20 edits minimum): 6
- Organizers: 2
These results far surpassed expectations and further strengthened the core knowledge base of Western Armenian Wikipedia.
| Additional part of the report (Lessons learned) |
|---|
One of the key lessons from Part Two is that timing has a significant impact on participation patterns in our community. Because the edit-a-thon took place during exam and finals season, as well as the broader holiday period, some regular contributors were unable to participate. As a result, we had a smaller group of 6 highly active editors this round. Importantly, these participants were committed, focused, and deeply engaged, which allowed the project to remain exceptionally productive. In fact, this small but dedicated group created or improved over 400+ essential articles — a strong indicator of the community’s growing skill and efficiency. The success of this project also reinforced the value of continuity. Building on the momentum of Part One, our contributors entered Part Two with greater confidence, technical knowledge, and a clearer sense of priority topics. Even with fewer participants, the quality and volume of contributions remained high, demonstrating the resilience and maturity of the Western Armenian Wikipedia community. These outcomes confirm that the edit-a-thon model is both sustainable and effective, and that future iterations can continue refining and adapting to seasonal or contextual factors without compromising impact. |
- Financial report
| Type of expense | Description | Amount (EUR) |
|---|---|---|
| Prizes | Prizes for Top 5 Editors | 400 |
| Fees | Bank transfer fees (higher than expected, once again). | 80 |
| Promotion | We will use this fee to continue subscribing to MailChimp, which is our largest channel and requires the paid version. | 50 |
| Accountant | Accounting fees | 50 |
| Operational costs | Unused, keeping for future UG expenses. | 20 |
- Achieved metrics
We managed to achieve all our target metrics. Main results in the following table:
| Metric | Target | Result | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Essential articles created or substantially improved | 200-250 | 410+ | Far exceeded the expected metrics of the proposal. |