Wikimedia Diversity Conference 2017/The Way Forward session
Main | Program | Scholarships | Ambassadors | Volunteers | Participants | Venue and visa | Travel guide | Discussion | Documentation |
Minority languages
[edit]Problem Place Holder |
Solution Place Holder |
Content addition and innovation
[edit]Problem Place Holder |
Solution Place Holder |
Involving youth in Wikipedia
[edit]Problem Place Holder |
Solution Place Holder |
Wikidata-powered automatic templates
[edit]Problem Place Holder |
Solution Place Holder |
LGBT issues
[edit]Problem Place Holder |
Solution Place Holder |
Imposter syndrome
[edit]Problem Place Holder |
Solution Place Holder |
Leadership skills for diversity
[edit]Problem Place Holder |
Solution Place Holder |
Diversity & Governance
[edit]Problem During the “Way Forward Session” of the Diversity Conference 2017 in Stockholm, we decided to discuss diversity in our movement from an (mainly) organizational perspective: how a commitment to diversity also needs to manifest itself in the governance structures of our movement organisations. “We” are a group of diversity activists who work on these issues in a volunteer and/or staff capacity. The aim of this document is to spark a discourse on diversity from an organisational perspective and to provide the results of these discussions as input for the phase 2 of our strategy process. We do not have all the answers, but we believe raising the important questions is the first important step into the right direction. We would be happy to see your support on this topic and to read your ideas and thoughts! --CDG (WMAT staff) (talk) 13:57, 12 December 2017 (UTC) --Virginia Díez (WMES) (talk) 18:59, 11 January 2018 (UTC) --Jorid Martinsen (WMNO) (talk) 11:52, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
|
Solution While movement affiliates only have very limited influence on the rules and structures of Wikimedia projects, one of the things we can control is the set-up of our organisations and here we should aim at leading by example. In order to do that, we should learn from best practices inside AND outside of the Wikimedia movement. Bylaws Board diversity Staff |
Deconolizing knowledge
[edit]Problem Place Holder |
Solution Place Holder |
Metrics for diversity
[edit]Problem Place Holder |
Solution Place Holder |
Conversation notes
[edit]María: Is the draft reflecting the conversations we've had? Does it make you feel empowered? Can you use this back home?
People tended to crowd around 50 % to 80 % agreement, thinning out with a few towards the agree more.
Why don’t people fully agree? Examples: Government censorship is an issue, translation isn’t necessarily the answer because of cultural issues, wording, no commitment to action – nice words, but where do we take them?
María: This is about giving an empowering statement that local community leaders can use.
Comment: I would like diversity and what it is and why it matters to Wikipedia, because that would make it less abstract and lead to more action.
Comment: It’s more global than local.
María: Can you as a local leader use this statement and work with it?
Pretty much evenly distributed between 20% and 100%.
Comment: it’s an abstract statement. ”We want more diversity but it’s complicated.” I need something clearer: What is diversity and what can I do.
Comment: We should take it to a more strategic direction that we could adopt for the communities.
Comment: Resources should be handled globally, then locally. Johan: Fairly certain I didn't get this. Feel free to edit.
Comment: I don’t care for the word solutions. We’re not going to solve the problem. We didn’t identify solution, we identify possible areas to work on. We haven’t resolved to do anything.