Wikimedia Foundation elections/2022/Affiliates regional distribution for the Analysis Committee/CEE

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Other languages:

This page supports CEE affiliates participation in the 2022 Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees elections Analysis Committee.

The Movement Strategy and Governance team is available to support this process.

Facilitators for this region include Maciej, Branimir and Aida.

Context[edit]

Main article: Wikimedia Foundation elections/2022


The affiliate organizations voted in this election in July to shortlist six candidates from the candidate pool. Each affiliate organization was allowed one vote. This selection used the Single Transferable Vote method. Affiliate organizations discussed the candidates the affiliate organization wanted to select. Candidates ranked candidates in order of preference.

The Affiliate Representatives were able to ask questions for the candidates to answer. Candidates published answers starting on June 24.

To assist with this selection process, an Analysis Committee was be formed.

Analysis Committee[edit]

For regional distribution of the Affiliates and facilitators who will be supporting it, see Affiliates regional distribution for the Analysis Committee

The Analysis Committee was formed from the affiliates during late April and May. The Analysis Committee was planned to be composed of 9 representatives of affiliates (including all chapters, user groups, and thematic groups) from regions across the movement. One each from:

  • CEE (Central & Eastern Europe);
  • ESEAP (East and Southeast Asia, and the Pacific region);
  • Sub-saharan Africa;
  • Latin America and the Caribbean;
  • MENA (Middle East and North Africa);
  • North America (USA and Canada);
  • Northern and Western Europe;
  • South Asia;
  • plus one for thematic affiliates.

There was no representative from the Northern and Western Europe or South Asia.

The selection process to form the Analysis Committee was defined by the affiliates, with support of the Elections Committee and the Movement Strategy and Governance team as needed.

The Analysis Committee evaluated the candidates against the skills and diversity, equity and inclusion criteria shared by the Board of Trustees. The Analysis Committee used the statements the candidates answered on their application to rate the candidates. The Analysis Committee rated candidates with a gold/silver/bronze framework. This rating was used to provide input to the affiliate organizations when they planned their vote. The details of the evaluation of each candidate will not be shared.

After the six candidates were selected during the affiliate organization voting process, the ratings of each selected candidate were published to inform the community vote. This process aims to find the best balance between sharing useful information and minimizing unnecessary exposure of candidates.

Selected committee members[edit]

Members of the Analysis Committee
Region Representative
CEE (Central & Eastern Europe) Mehman97 (talk meta edits global user summary CA)
ESEAP (East, Southeast Asia, and the Pacific) GDHFang (talk meta edits global user summary CA)
Sub-Saharan Africa Dnshitobu (talk meta edits global user summary CA)
Latin America and the Caribbean Superzerocool (talk meta edits global user summary CA)
MENA (Middle East and North Africa) علاء (talk meta edits global user summary CA)
North America Megs (talk meta edits global user summary CA)
Western & Northern Europe
SAARC (South Asia)
Thematic Affiliates Joalpe (talk meta edits global user summary CA)

Process[edit]

The Analysis Committee worked from late May to mid-June. Details of their meetings and process can be found on the Analysis Committee Discussions.

The Board Selection Task Force and the Elections Committee developed a set of evaluation criteria for the Analysis Committee to evaluate candidates against. The Analysis Committee members assessed candidates individually. Only two Movement Strategy and Governance facilitators who supported the process had access to these individual scores.

Procedure for determining the committee membership[edit]

Similar to a previous regional process, the procedure should be defined by the affiliates in the table below.

This page was created to assist the affiliate coordination and should be edited collaboratively.

Region affiliates[edit]

Affiliate Affiliate representative Comments
Don Wikimedians User Group
North-West Russia Wiki-Historians User Group
Wikigrannies User Group
Wikimedia Community of Kazakh language User Group
Wikimedia Community of Tatar language User Group
Wikimedians of Bashkortostan User Group
Wikimedians of Erzya language User Group
Wikimedians of Saint Petersburg User Group
Wikipedians of North Caucasus User Group
Викимедиа РУ (Russia)
Wikimedians of the Uzbek language User Group
Вікімедіа Україна (Ukraine)
GLAM Macedonia User Group
Shared Knowledge (Macedonia)
Wikimedia Community User Group Albania
Wikimedia Community User Group Greece
Wikimedia Community User Group Turkey
Wikimedia Serbia Dungodung
Wikimedians of Albanian Language User Group
Wikimedians of Republic of Srpska
Wikimedians of Romania and Moldova User Group
Wikimedia Armenia
Wikimedia Česká republika (Czech Republic)
Wikimedia Community User Group Belarus
Wikimedia Community User Group CEE Spring
Wikimedia Community User Group Georgia Mehman97
Wikimedia Eesti (Estonia)
Wikimédia Magyarország (Hungary)
Wikimedia Polska (Poland) Natalia Szafran-Kozakowska (WMPL)
Wikimedians of Latvia User Group
Wikimedians of Slovakia User Group
Wikimedians of Western Armenian Language User Group
Wikimedia Community User Group Malta
Iranian Wikimedians User Group
Azerbaijani Wikimedians User Group Wertuose
Wikimedians of Turkic Languages User Group Jelican9
Wikipedians of Slovenia User Group

Users willing to be Analysis Committee members[edit]

(Self nominations or nominated by others with nominee accepting)