Wybory Wikimedia Foundation/2025/Pytania do kandydatów

This page is a translated version of the page Wikimedia Foundation elections/2025/Questions for candidates and the translation is 100% complete.

2025 WMF Board election

Introduction

For candidates

For voters

Election method and platform

Organization

Ten szablon: pokaż · dyskusja · edytuj

W każdym procesie selekcji społeczność ma możliwość zgłaszania pytań do kandydatów do Rady Powierniczej. Komitet wyborczy wybiera pytania z listy opracowanej przez społeczność, na które kandydaci mają odpowiedzieć. Kandydaci są zobowiązani do udzielenia odpowiedzi wyłącznie na wybrane pytania. Kandydaci muszą odpowiedzieć na wszystkie wymagane pytania zawarte w zgłoszeniu, aby kwalifikować się do udziału w wyborach; w przeciwnym razie ich zgłoszenie zostanie zdyskwalifikowane.

Mechanizm

W tym roku zaproszenie społeczności do zgłaszania pytań zostanie połączone z ogłoszeniem rozpoczęcia wyborów, dzięki czemu będziemy mogli zebrać pytania na wcześniejszym etapie procesu. Następnie Komitet wyborczy wybierze pięć (5) pytań, na które kandydaci będą musieli odpowiedzieć. Wybrane pytania mogą być połączeniem różnych pytań zgłoszonych przez społeczność, jeśli są one podobne lub powiązane. Wybrane pytania zostaną włączone do zgłoszenia kandydata, więc kandydaci będą musieli odpowiedzieć na pytania tylko raz. Ma to na celu poprawę doświadczenia i zmniejszenie obciążenia kandydatów oraz ułatwienie wyborcom przeglądania wszystkich odpowiedzi w jednym miejscu.

Wybrane pytania i odpowiedzi

Komitet wyborczy wybrał następujące pytania, na które kandydaci będą musieli odpowiedzieć. Kandydaci będą mieli czas do July 1, 2025 na udzielenie odpowiedzi na pytania w swoich oświadczeniach kandydackich.

How do you plan to ensure transparency and accountability in your decision-making processes as a member of the Board of Trustees?
What will be the first new issue you would like to bring to the attention of the Board for discussion, and how would you approach it?
How should decisions about trade-offs and prioritisation in Wikimedia technology or product areas be approached? Please explain what the trade-off is in your view.
The number of Wikimedia affiliates has grown significantly over the past few years, but ensuring adequate resourcing can be a challenge. Given this, how might we rethink the movement ecosystem, including how affiliates are evaluated, engaged, and resourced?
As the Wikimedia Foundation's Chief Executive Officer (CEO) position transitions, what qualities do you believe the incoming leader should embody, and how would these contribute to the advancement of the Wikimedia movement?

Pytania zgłoszone przez członków społeczności

As Wikimedia approaches 25, how do you see as the grand strategy and key initiatives for the next 25 years? — The preceding unsigned comment was added by NabuKudurru (talk) 15:53 (UTC)
How do you think Wikimedia can effectively transition from 'free public knowledge contributed by perhaps nonexperts' to 'high quality professional knowledge maintained by experts'? — The preceding unsigned comment was added by NabuKudurru (talk) 15:53 (UTC)
The time of AI is undoubtedly coming. How do you see the role of Wikimedia projects in 25 years? — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Karol739 (talk) 16:38 (UTC)
How do you plan to ensure transparency and accountability in your decision-making processes as a member of the Board of Trustees? — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Azmat30062010 (talk) 19:56 (UTC)
What will be the first issue you bring to the attention of the Board for discussion, and what draft resolution will you propose regarding this issue? --Perohanych (talk) 18:36, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please take this quiz honestly and report your score (out of 80). Leaderboard (talk) 08:42, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What are the current shortcomings in the technical support provided by WMF to the community? Which Wikimedia technology area or product should be prioritized most? --Steven Sun (talk) 09:17, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The number of Wikimedia affiliates has grown significantly over the past few years, but our resources haven't kept pace. Given this, how might we rethink how we evaluate affiliates, their engagement, and their access to funding from the Wikimedia Foundation? Superzerocool (talk) 12:18, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If a Wikimedia fairy granted you a single wish for the Wikimedia movement—a wish unburdened by limits of resources, time, or people—what would you ask for and why? Superzerocool (talk) 12:21, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
As the Wikimedia Foundation's Executive Director position transitions, what qualities do you believe the incoming leader should embody, and how would these contribute to the advancement of the Wikimedia movement? Superzerocool (talk) 12:24, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What's your stance on the Movement Charter, its outcome, and how the Wikimedia Foundation has reacted to its rejection and the experiments it's currently developing? Superzerocool (talk)
What do you think about the future of our not regular end user oriented projects Wikidata and Commons? Would you support investing much more (technical development) into them to make them a hub of an open data and open media ecosystem beyond Wikimedia projects? GPSLeo (talk) 20:19, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What do you think about moving more software development for specific Wiki projects to chapters (like it was done with Wikibase/Wikidata)? GPSLeo (talk) 20:19, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What on-wiki edits are your best contributions, and why? House Blaster (talk • he/they) 20:02, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Last month, two of our Belarusian contributors were detained. This is just the most recent example of Wikimedians arrested, sued, or threatened in connection to their pursuit of our shared goals. How can the Wikimedia Foundation best use its resources to protect and/or defend good faith contributors against efforts to censor or chill speech on our platforms? — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 13:47, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]