Wikimedia Foundation elections/FDC Ombudsperson elections/2015/Candidates/pl

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page is a translated version of the page Wikimedia Foundation elections/FDC Ombudsperson elections/2015/Candidates and the translation is 13% complete.

Info The election ended 31 maja 2015. No more votes will be accepted.
The results were announced on 5 czerwca 2015. Please consider submitting any feedback regarding the 2015 election on the election's post mortem page.
Other languages:
Bahasa Indonesia • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎Kiswahili • ‎Nederlands • ‎Tiếng Việt • ‎Türkçe • ‎español • ‎français • ‎italiano • ‎polski • ‎português do Brasil • ‎русский • ‎українська • ‎العربية • ‎فارسی • ‎हिन्दी • ‎বাংলা • ‎中文 • ‎日本語

This page contains candidates for the 2015 Wikimedia Foundation FDC Ombudsperson elections. Members of the 2015 Wikimedia Foundation Elections Committee, or the Wikimedia Foundation staff, will verify wiki based candidate requirements. Wikimedia Foundation staff will verify identification and later verify offline candidate requirements. Verification of wiki-based requirements and identification will be identified on this page. Offline candidate requirements will be verified at a later stage.

Kirill Lokshin (Kirill Lokshin)

Kirill Lokshin (talk meta edits global user summary CA  AE)

Podsumowanie
Kirill Lokshin (2013).jpg
  • Dane osobiste:
    • Imię i nazwisko: Kirill Lokshin
    • Wiek: 31
    • Miejsce zamieszkania: Washington, DC, United States
    • Języki: English-N, Russian-N, French-1
  • Historia edycji:
    • Uczestnik projektów Wikimedia od: June 2005
    • Projekty: en.wiki, meta
Program kandydata I've been a Wikimedian for almost ten years, having first started editing in June 2005. In that time, I've held numerous roles across the movement, including serving on Wikimedia DC's board and being a member of the Affiliations Committee, English Wikipedia's Arbitration Committee, and a number of other advisory groups.

While the FDC process has matured and improved significantly over the past several years, I believe that further enhancements is always possible, and that a philosophy of continuous evaluation and improvement of such key processes is healthy for the Funds Dissemination Committee, the Wikimedia Foundation, and the rest of the Wikimedia movement. The Ombudsperson has a key role to play in advocating for such continuous improvement and ensuring that participants' and stakeholders' concerns with the process are addressed in a constructive fashion.

Pytania obowiązkowe 1. Jakie, Twoim zdaniem, Twoje doświadczenie mogą wspomóc pracę i proces rekomendacji FDC?
1.1. Jeśli chodzi o kierowanie i/lub ocenianie planami rocznymi i programami?
As a board member of Wikimedia DC, I've been a part of the chapter's annual planning and evaluation processes since they began in 2012; this has included developing annual plans, soliciting corresponding funding through the WMF's grants programs, executing the planned programs, and conducting end-of-year evaluations of program success and impact. I've also had the opportunity to review other affiliate organizations' annual plans during as part of my participation on the Grant Advisory Committee.
1.2. Na temat składania wniosków grantowych?
I've been involved with the Wikimedia movement's grantmaking processes at various levels for a number of years. I served on the Grant Advisory Committee (GAC) in 2012–2013, and have been a member of the Individual Engagement Grants (IEG) Committee since 2014. In addition, I oversee the Wikimedia DC small grants program.

2. Jak rozumiesz rolę Rzecznika?

The role of the Ombudsperson is twofold. First, the Ombudsperson collects, investigates, synthesizes, and documents complaints and other feedback about the FDC process from participants and observers, and provides recommendations based on this feedback to the various stakeholders in the process. Second, the Ombudsperson is available to assist the Board and the FDC in investigating formal complaints when an independent evaluation is requested.

3. Jakie potencjalne skargi na proces FDC uważasz że mogłyby być dokumentowane przez Rzecznika, i jak byś sobie z nimi radził/a?

Historically, the majority of complaints about the FDC process appear to relate to poor documentation and communication, as well as differences in expectations between the FDC applicant organizations and the WMF staff and FDC members who review their applications. By identifying insufficiently documented or misunderstood process elements and acting as an advocate for process evaluation and improvement from cycle to cycle, the Ombudsperson can help to resolve the sources of these miscommunications and misunderstandings.
Zatwierdzenie Zatwierdzenie przeprowadzone przez komitet wyborczy lub pracowników Fundacji Wikimedia.
Uprawnienie: Artículo bueno.svg Zatwierdzono
Zatwierdzono przez: Ruslik (talk) 22:05, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Identyfikacja: Artículo bueno.svg Zatwierdzono
Zatwierdzono przez: Jalexander--WMF 21:20, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Mykola Kozlenko (NickK)

NickK (talk meta edits global user summary CA  AE)

Podsumowanie
Visiting Wikimedia UK office, August 2013
  • Dane osobiste:
    • Imię i nazwisko: Mykola Kozlenko
    • Wiek: 25
    • Miejsce zamieszkania: Kyiv, Ukraine / Paris, France
    • Języki: Ukrainian-N, Russian-N, English-3, French-3, German-2
  • Historia edycji:
Program kandydata Pozycja Rzecznika Komitetu Finansowego nie jest najbardziej widoczna, ale odgrywa kluczową rolę w poprawie pracy Komitetu Finansowego. Program dotacji na rocznych planów stale się rozwija, i byłoby korzystne dla ruchu Wikimedia wziąć pod uwagę sugestie zainteresowanych stron: organizacje składające wnioski, członków zarządu i Komitetu Finansowego uczestniczących w przeglądzie propozycje, pracownicy Fundacji Wikimedia ułatwiających proces oraz członków społeczności w ogóle. Ważną misją Rzecznika Komitetu Finansowego będzie upewnienie się, że przejrzystość procesu jest utrzymywane i wszystkie obawy jest obsługiwane.

Jestem aktywny w ruchu Wikimedia 7 lat, i mam dobrą znajomość społeczności Wikimedia w krajach rozwijających się (Ukraina) oraz w krajach rozwiniętych (Francja). Online, jestem administratorem, checkuserem i byłym arbitrem ukraińskiej Wikipedii. Jestem także uczestnikiem niektórych projektów Wikimedia w innych językach. Offline, jestem członkiem od 2009 roku Wikimedia Ukraina, członkiem zarządu tej organizacji od 2012 roku, a od 2013 jej skarbnikiem. Jestem zaangażowany w wiele projektów, takich jak Wiki Loves Monuments, Wiki Loves Earth, konkursy artykułów, QRpedia i innych.

Pytania obowiązkowe 1. Jakie, Twoim zdaniem, Twoje doświadczenie mogą wspomóc pracę i proces rekomendacji FDC?
1.1. Jeśli chodzi o kierowanie i/lub ocenianie planami rocznymi i programami?
As a board member of Wikimedia Ukraine since 2012, I have been involved in both planning and evaluating our annual programmes. In particular, for the last two years I was a contributor to the chapter's annual plan and an author of our annual reports. As a treasurer, I have written and supported the grant proposals, worked on the execution of the respective programmes and prepared reports measuring results and impact of these activities. While preparing Wikimedia CEE Meeting 2014, I was also involved in evaluating activities of other chapters and communities of Central and Eastern Europe.
1.2. Na temat składania wniosków grantowych?
I have an extensive experience in grantmaking, most notably, I am involved in submitting grant proposals for annual PEG grants for Wikimedia Ukraine for the last three years. I also contributed to the review of a number of grants to other Wikimedia affiliates, and I was a member of the team managing travel scholarships for Wikimedia CEE Meeting 2014.

2. Jak rozumiesz rolę Rzecznika?

The role of FDC Ombudsperson involves documenting complaints and suggestions of the participants of the process in order to improve it. On one hand, the Ombudsperson should deal with formal complaints from the participants of the process, which involves collecting evidence from all parties of the process, publicly documenting complaints and assisting investigations if needed. On the other hand, the Ombudsperson summarise general feedback about the FDC process by taking into account suggestions by the participants of the process.

3. Jakie potencjalne skargi na proces FDC uważasz że mogłyby być dokumentowane przez Rzecznika, i jak byś sobie z nimi radził/a?

I believe that complaints regarding the FDC process can be split into two groups:
  • Complaints affecting one particular participants of the process. The most likely conflicts here will be those regarding eligibility or fund allocations, and these conflicts mean that the outcome of the FDC process did not meet the expectations of these organisations. In these cases I will collect points of view and evidence from all involved parties and will analyse and investigate them in impartial and transparent way.
  • Complaints affecting many participants of the process. The most likely concerns here will be around usability of the FDC portal for both applicants and reviewers and clarity of the requirements regarding information and documents to provide. In order to deal with these problems, I will collect suggestions by different participants of the process and will summarise them and raise these issues.
Zatwierdzenie Zatwierdzenie przeprowadzone przez komitet wyborczy lub pracowników Fundacji Wikimedia.
Uprawnienie: Artículo bueno.svg Zatwierdzono
Zatwierdzono przez: Varnent (talk)(COI) 00:06, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Identyfikacja: Artículo bueno.svg Zatwierdzono
Zatwierdzono przez: Jalexander--WMF 00:16, 1 May 2015 (UTC)