|← Discussion pages||Wikimedia Forums||Archives →|
The Wikimedia Forum is a central place for questions and discussions about the Wikimedia Foundation and its projects. (For discussion about the Meta wiki, see Meta:Babel.)
- 1 Automagic global bans for LTAs
- 2 Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees elections 2015
- 3 Wikimedia privacy invasion
- 4 Azvikipedia
- 5 News: Wikimedia projects have been blocking in mainland China.
- 6 Voting banner
- 7 I can't save my CSS because of spam links
- 8 Meta Collaboration of the Month
- 9 Wikimedia Foundation Annual Plan
- 10 Little help
- 11 !GGG Help.
- 12 How I Will Do?
- 13 Questionnaire !GGG
- 14 Dogfood
- 15 Espero Alguma Sugestão !Geovane1999
Automagic global bans for LTAs
We see a fair number of sockpuppets used by LTAs that get first indefinitely banned on sight (after firts few edits) on one particular project just to receive a global ban in a short while.
This seems to be a redundant duplication of work to me.
Hence, I propose that every account that:
- is indefinitely blocked on all projects it has edits on
- is not granted any rights beyond autoconfirmed on any project
receives an automagic global ban.
- I would like to see this to happen, but what technical suggestion can you offer? It may serve as an idea for future use or creating a better idea.--AldNonymousBicara? 15:26, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
- Someone proposed to automatically lock/block global accounts upon certain conditions, but I can't find the report in Phabricator. Anyway it probably depends on phabricator:T17294 and would probably be less needed if there were global autoblocks (phabricator:T19929). --Nemo 15:39, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
- I dunno, but can't there be a bot with sysop rights that would be doing this at least until a more right-handed solution appears? Marcgalrespons 20:54, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, there is, some wiki employ that method, but mostly it's for a specific case, there are limitation for that to be able to be implemented globally on all wikis.
- 1. (Bot with steward rights problem) This bot will need a stewards rights to be able auto(b)locking globally from centralauth. This would be impossible as steward must always be elected and the part of the rules that says they are must be over 18 years olds means they must be human and not bot.
- 2. (False positive problem) The part that bot script for this kind of action only uses script that allow them to block specific usernames, but this may raise some problem because if implemented globally means they can do lock and locked people can not object to their lock (mentioned by Nemo) as they can not log in to their account and to object about their lock was misplaced against them.
- I'm currently still searching about a way to solve this (passively) but all kind of idea are welcomed.--AldNonymousBicara? 21:32, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
- Ad. 1. The human gets the rights, not the tool. Therefore I do not see why couldn't a steward run a bot from his/her account. But OK, I see, it is against your strict rules, right? Sorry, but from my perspective it is like forcing a licenced carpenter to only use screwdrivers - because if if he was to use a drill, then the drill would have to be given carpenter licence, which is impossible. Nevermind.Marcgalrespons 13:59, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
The Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees is the ultimate governing authority of the Wikimedia Foundation, a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization registered in the United States. The Wikimedia Foundation manages many diverse projects such as Wikipedia and Commons.
- The translation onto Polish is ready for a long time... But it is not published yet. Wieralee (talk) 11:36, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Wikimedia privacy invasion
Steward requests/Checkuser#FreightXPress.40wikidata - I was connected by User:Mardetanha to an IP (18.104.22.168) and an IP range (91). The account "Tamawashi" edited the last time in July 2014.
That kind of storage of IP addresses and publication thereof is an invasion of privacy.
On the other hand WMF sues NSA for mass surveillance : http://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/03/10/wikimedia-v-nsa/
- Wikimedia Foundation wikis IP data for username accounts expires after 3 months on each public wiki.
If you believe that you have evidence of a privacy breach by an advanced rightsholder then you should be approaching the Ombudsmen Commission who investigate and oversee such matters. — billinghurst sDrewth 21:50, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
- It has nothing to do with spying or whatsoever, these are just tools, helping us to keep wiki safe, as suggested by sDrewth if you think I did something wrong you may approach Ombudsmen Commission and if you want protest storage of IPs (though I should emphasize generally we don't store users ip at all, it just happens in rare condition such as cross-wiki issues) you may open RFC page Mardetanha talk 05:11, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
User:sefer azeri' is engaged in vandalism: 1 (Reliable sources wiped out.), 2 (Without any major wiped out the picture., , ) , 3 (Fraud. Map changed. 100 years have reduced the state's history.), 4 (Insult.)... Requires block it for at least a year. But it was never punished for their work. Sortilegus always supported him. He is also engaged in vandalism: 1 (Reliable sources wiped out), 2 (The name of the state, has been removed.), 3 (Reliable sources wiped out)... Wertuose always supported him. He is also engaged in vandalism: 1 (Picture of the article - az:Bakı xan sarayı), is deleted.. 2 (insult; Əxlaqsız ifadələrə görə...). The 3 users blocked me, without any reason! We do not have arbitration and appellate courts. Therefore, administrators dictator. No one can give me an answer?! To whom should I complain? -Idin Mammadof (talk) 14:07, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
News: Wikimedia projects have been blocking in mainland China.
Wikipedia have been blocking in mainland China since the morning of May 19th, 2015(UTC). Both http and htttps version couldn't be able to access.Maybe DNS problems caused this issue. Some IP address are blocked in China.w:zh:Wikipedia talk:狀況回報 shows the results from wikipedians in mainland China.This tool can show the results from different DNS servers in China.--Techyan (talk) 14:22, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Not sure if this is the right place to mention this, but I've noticed that the voting banner has some unnecessary capital letters. The text reads: "Voting Has Begun in Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees Election! Votings Ends at (...). "has begun" and "ends" do not have to be capitalised of course. Thanks. --Soetermans (talk) 12:37, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
- I was told that Talk:Wikimedia Foundation elections 2015 is the proper place to bring up issues about the banner. --Glaisher (talk) 12:39, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
I want to create my own CSS style, but an abuse filter flags the edit as "Spam article trap". I have no links to other sites that are spam, and it's a false positive. I removed the spam links, but did not work. I am unable to use my CSS because it has spam, but it doesn't. What does this mean, and how do I fix it? SlotWiki (talk) 03:19, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- It is impossible to answer this question as you did not specify the exact content that you tried to save. Ruslik (talk) 13:27, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
It is your civic duty to vote in the most important election currently affecting our Wikimedia community: Meta Collaboration of the Month. So far, the leading candidate for improvement for June 2015 is the remarkably out-of-date Events!--Pharos (talk) 19:00, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
This page suggests that the 2015-2016 Annual Plan will have been discussed with the community in April. Where is the result of that discussion please? Is the draft as discussed still available? Rogol Domedonfors (talk) 21:58, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
- The draft plan was published at Wikimedia Foundation Annual Plan/2015-16 shortly after I posted this comment. The community has four days to comment on it. Is that sufficient, I wonder? Obviously not. Rogol Domedonfors (talk) 06:34, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- Try Help:Help or the main help page for whichever Wikimedia wiki you are trying to use. --GeorgeBarnick (talk) 01:47, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Yes. !GGG (talk) 03:58, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- mw:Extension:Babel maybe will help you out. --GeorgeBarnick (talk) 01:45, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Trank You! !GGG (talk) 04:01, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
How I Will Do?
- What project do you want to contribute to? There are pages on several projects about how to contribute:
- Find more projects here. --GeorgeBarnick (talk) 04:23, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- "Wikimedia" consists of several projects using MediaWiki as software under the professional/financial umbrella of the "Wikimedia Foundation" (WMF), among others commons, wikidata, enwiki, ptwiki, meta (= here), MediawikiWiki, etc., as listed on the Wikimedia projects page linked by GeorgeBarnick above. Some of these projects actually consist of many wikis in various languages. Also see mw:Wikimedia on MediawikiWiki for the confusing Wikimedia vs. Mediawiki terminology, or if that's too long:
- Not all wikis use Mediawiki as software, not all Wikis based on Mediawiki belong to Wikimedia, but Wikimedia wikis always use Mediawiki. As soon as you've found a project matching your interests maybe ask for details on their help desk, this forum here is mostly about questions or issues affecting many Wikimedia projects. –Be..anyone (talk) 12:48, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
How about using Flow here? It still sucks, and it will get worse instead of better (for users like me not interested at all in "vi"), but the traditional talk page style is IMHO not more state of the art. –Be..anyone (talk) 13:03, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- It was enabled here at Meta somewhere last year but the page was protected/deleted by a sysop. --Glaisher (talk) 13:09, 26 May 2015 (UTC)