User talk:DMK-C5

Welcome![edit]

Hello DMK-C5! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 14:32, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

September 2022[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Khiru Mahto has been reverted.
Your edit here to Khiru Mahto was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline (see also this list of frequently-discussed sources). The reference(s) you added or changed (https://www.republicworld.com/india-news/politics/jdus-khiru-mahto-bags-rs-ticket-rcp-singh-snubbed-amid-rumoured-rift-with-bihar-cm-articleshow.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:32, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Indian Navy Ship (October 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Slywriter were:

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a dictionary. We cannot accept articles that are little more than definitions of words or abbreviations as entries. A good article should begin with a good definition, but expand on the subject. You might try creating a definition for this instead at Wiktionary, which is a dictionary. Please only do so if it meets that sister project's criteria for inclusion. These require among others, attestation for the word or phrase, as verified through clear widespread use, or its use in permanently recorded media, conveying meaning, in at least three independent instances spanning at least a year.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Indian Navy. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Nothing here that can not be covered in the main article

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Indian Navy Ship and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Slywriter (talk) 21:25, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DMK-C5! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Slywriter (talk) 21:25, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bidyut Ganguly has been accepted[edit]

Bidyut Ganguly, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:03, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:TTP1233 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TTP1233. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Mz7 (talk) 21:29, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disappointed.[edit]

I am rather disappointed to see that you were evading a block. If you can keep out of English Wikipedia for 6 months, without issues whilst editing in another project, you could be eligible for the WP:STANDARD OFFER. I suggest you try this. So, I would like to kindly say this; I don't want to see you here again for at least 6 months. Otherwise you will just ruin it for yourself, and remove most, if not all chance of ever being allowed back. Cheerio. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 07:54, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Mako001, sir When I opened TTP1233, I tried to do things good but later I revealed my identity mistakenly, which is easily for everyone to detect. I blocked. I waited 6 months and applied an unblock request under SO but 3 months after my request. They granted me unblock. I tried to start with reverting vandalism, which I got experience in it. But another mistake made me reblocked is just adding a poorly sourced cite to an article. I lose my hope. So I reopened the account but I see, it won't stop. Even if I request now, no one will support me for unblock, (not just I disrupted this wiki but block evasion). I feel sorrow for some wikipedian to be faced like that. Wikipedia is my one of the best time to spent. If I could my disruption from this begining (on my mastersock), then I would never face this. My reputation over there (in simplewiki) is going to be finished.

Some editors beleives that I'm not competent to edit. But what I did was just over-excited..Anyways I'm still happy you appreciated my work before getting blocked. I get encouraged. I thought I would never come back, but you encouraged me again. I will not interfare anything within 6 months starting from 10-10-2022 to 10-04-2023. Good bye for now. DMK-C5 (talk) 08:52, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If, in 6 months you are successfully unblocked, you should keep doing what you seem to be doing best, which is reverting vandalism and similar. You should be fine. Just stick to that. When you make your unblock request, you should make it clear that you will only be doing RC patrol (reverting vandalism) as you seem to be competent at that, even if you may not be good at contributing new content.

There are quite a few successful editors who do RC Patrol, but who do not have good English skills. These editors just keep to RC patrol, because they know that they aren't able to contribute by adding content, as they dont quite know the language well enough. That is fine.

If I was to go to the German language Wikipedia and try to contribute content, I would soon be blocked, because I don't know German very well at all. But, I could revert vandalism in German, and so long as I didn't go beyond my abilities, I wouldn't be blocked.

Have you seen this page: m:List of Wikipedias? Maybe there is one in a language you know better? Whilst you are waiting for your 6 months, try to spend time there, but you should use the first account you ever used. Then, ask for the SO on that.

Please don't try to evade your block here. When a user asks for an unblock per WP:SO, a Checkuser will see if they have been using other accounts in the last 6 months. If you have, you will be back to square one, and it will make it harder to get unblocked. If you can find another Wikimedia project to edit on, it will help your case if you can show that you have done good work there.

Cheerio. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 13:13, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]