Steward requests/Permissions: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Browse history interactively
← Older editNewer edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→‎Midleading@zhwikisource: done for 3 months
Line 59: Line 59:
==== Midleading@zhwikisource ====
==== Midleading@zhwikisource ====
{{sr-request
{{sr-request
|status = <!--don't change this line-->
|status = done<!--don't change this line-->
|domain = zh.wikisource<!-- such as en.wikibooks -->
|domain = zh.wikisource<!-- such as en.wikibooks -->
|user name =Midleading
|user name =Midleading
Line 65: Line 65:
}}
}}
I have passed the request for adminship process on zhwikisource[[User:Midleading|Midleading]] ([[User talk:Midleading|talk]]) 01:23, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
I have passed the request for adminship process on zhwikisource[[User:Midleading|Midleading]] ([[User talk:Midleading|talk]]) 01:23, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
:{{TempSysop|3|2018|02|01||automsg=1}} [[User:Ruslik0|Ruslik]] ([[User talk:Ruslik0|talk]]) 16:31, 1 November 2017 (UTC)


=== Bureaucrat access ===
=== Bureaucrat access ===

Revision as of 16:31, 1 November 2017

Shortcut:
SRP

This page is for requests to have stewards grant or revoke administrator, bureaucrat, checkuser, and oversight rights on Wikimedia projects which do not have a local permissions procedure.

Old sections are archived. The list of archives is below.

  • Requests for bot flags are handled at SRB, and requests for global permissions are handled at SRGP.
  • If you are requesting adminship or bureaucratship, and your wiki has a local bureaucrat, submit your request to that user or to the relevant local request page (index).
  • For urgent requests, such as to combat large-scale vandalism on a small wiki, contact a steward in the #wikimedia-stewardsconnect IRC channel. In emergencies, type !steward in the channel to get the attention of stewards. Otherwise, you can type @steward for non-urgent help.

Other than requests to remove your own access or emergencies, please only make requests here after gaining the on-wiki approval of your local community.

Quick navigation: Administrator | Interface administrator | Bureaucrat | CheckUser | Oversight | Removal of access | Miscellaneous | Global permissions

(translate | edit)

Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Using this page

1. Place the following code at the bottom of the appropriate section below: 

==== Username@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = <!-- such as en.wikibooks -->
 |user name = 
 |discussion= 
}}
(your remarks) ~~~~

2. Fill in the values:

  • domain: the wiki's URL domain (like "ex.wikipedia" or "meta.wikimedia").
  • user name: the name of the user whose rights are to be changed (like "Exampleuser"). In case you're requesting access for multiple bots, leave this field blank and give a list of these bots in your remarks
  • discussion: a link to the local vote or discussion about the rights change (for example, "[[ex:Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship#ExampleUser]]"). This should normally be for at least one week, but no more than three weeks (if so, you'll need to restart the process).

3. If anything is missing from your request, a steward will request more information.

Confirmation of signing confidentiality agreement

Certain permissions (notably CheckUser and Oversight) additionally require users to sign a confidentiality agreement. Users requesting these permissions must make a request below, and must also sign the confidentiality agreement with the Wikimedia Foundation. The request is placed on hold temporarily, until the receipt has been formally confirmed by the Office.

Requests

COPY THE FOLLOWING CODE to the bottom of the appropriate section below: 

 and also mistakes. Thank you. 
}}

Administrator access

See Administrator for information about this user group.

  • MediaWiki interface translations are done at translatewiki.net. Please do not request administrator access solely for that purpose; your request will be declined.
  • Stewards: Please use {{Systmp}} for approved temporary requests.

Requests for removal of access should be posted at the section below.

Please start a new discussion about requesting the permission on the local village pump, administrators' noticeboard or a designated page for requesting permissions each time you request or renew adminship.

  • Discussions should be open for seven days. Please request adminship here seven days after discussions started. This page is not the place for any discussions or votes. (For wikis with few active users, it is OK to have no comments.)
  • If you only want adminship for specific tasks, please state for how long and for which tasks you need it. Otherwise stewards will decide whether to assign permanent adminship and the duration of adminship. See Steward requests/Permissions/Minimum voting requirements.

Фред-Продавец звёзд@ruwikibooks

Status:    Not done

Требую присвоения флага администратора Русского Викиучебника по результатам обсуждения и голосования в сообществе. Фред-Продавец звёзд (talk) 16:58, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Я не вижу консенсуса для присвоения флага администратора. Ruslik (talk) 18:49, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The first supporter only has one edit in the project - which is this support. Apparently, canvassing is going on.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:13, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, no! This was a fake-voting, all users on that page have no edits in ru-wikibooks. Iniquity (talk) 19:17, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well, Леонид Макаров has some sizable contribution, all other supporters are indeed driveby accounts. A clear case of disruption.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:45, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
And the RfA was linked last moment [1], shortly before it was closed.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:47, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Ruslik (talk) 20:06, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Хм, и куда же надо было смотреть, чтобы не увидеть консенсуса? Ссылка приложена. Поскольку в Викиучебнике, действительно, практически отсутствуют активные участники (а сообщество как таковое отсутствует), голосовать позволяется всем участникам, имеющим активность в проектах Фонда (независимо от таковой в конкретном Викиучебнике). Глобальный вклад всех участников обсуждения можно посмотреть здесь, все, кто голосовал, имеют большой стаж, а кое-где и административные флаги. Если же по каким-то причинам вы не считаете это консенсусом, можете обратить внимание на аргументы. С моей стороны всё правильно. Так что запрос в силе. Фред-Продавец звёзд (talk) 16:03, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cekli829@az.wikibooks

Status:    In progress

For permanent... Thanks! --►Cekli829 20:08, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

At least 15 voters out of 19 aren't actually active at az.wikibooks. So, there's no room for permanent adminship. I'm also doubtful about a temporary one because of your recent sysop abuse at az.wiki. --Vituzzu (talk) 20:20, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
İdarəçilik səlahiyyətimdən sui-istifadə məsələlərindən söhbət belə gedə bilməz. Kimlərsə narazıdırlarsa, onlar AzVikinin lokal xüsusiyyətlərinə bələd olmayan istifadəçilərdir. Sui-istifadə ilə bağlı məsələləri ötən dəfə də əsaslandırmışdım. Bloklanmış istifadəçinin blokunu isə sırf Sizə görə açdım. "az.wikibooks"da istifadəçilərin aktiv olmaması isə çox normal bir haldır. Çünki heç kəsi bu layihəyə məcbur cəlb edə bilmərik. Amma qeyd edim ki, səs verən istifadəçilər digər vikilayihələrdə kifayət qədər aktivdir. --►Cekli829 05:30, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Blocking someone only because they find a copyright violation by you is a clear abuse, worth even desysopping IMHO. --Vituzzu (talk) 07:10, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Axı müəlliflik hüquqlarının pozulmasından söhbət belə gedə bilməz. Müvafiq qurum öz razılığını hətta məktub şəklində də mənə göndərmişdir. --►Cekli829 11:24, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Apart from the matter (in which you're anyway wrong) the block you made was an abuse. --Vituzzu (talk) 13:08, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Mən bloklama səbəbini Sizə izah etmişdim. Səbəb qeyd olunan məsələlərdən qaynaqlansa da, onu bloklamağıma səbəb bilavasitə onun məni vandalizmdə ittiham etməsi olmuşdur. Bəlkə Sizə bloklama müddəti uzun görünə bilər, mən də elə ona görə kifayət qədər vaxt keçdikdən sonra, həm də Sizin tələbinizə uyğun olaraq onun bloku açdım. Amma nəzərinizə çatdırım ki, AzVikidə hazırda qüvvədə olan Bloklama qaydalarına görə "Bloklama müddəti idarəçi tərəfindən sərbəst olaraq təyin edilir." --►Cekli829 13:45, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Vituzzu, in azwikibooks very few active users. And Cekli is one of them. In the voting of Araz Yaguboglu many of the voters also were not active users in azwikibooks. You give him sysop status. These users are mostly active in azwikipedia. To support our projects outside azwikipedia, we thus choose administrators there. Cekli was elected. You can give him sysop status in azwikibooks. With best regards: --Sortilegus (talk) 19:01, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, Araz Yaguboglu has no records of sysop abuse, while votes were definitely insufficient for permanent adminship they were for a temporary one. --Vituzzu (talk) 17:20, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Səsvermə nəticələrinin qəbul olunması üçün nə qədər zamana ehtiyac var? --►Cekli829 18:15, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Midleading@zhwikisource

Status:    Done

I have passed the request for adminship process on zhwikisourceMidleading (talk) 01:23, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2018-02-01. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 16:31, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bureaucrat access

See Bureaucrat for information about this user group.
  • In principle, requests for temporary bureaucrat access are not granted.
  • A small project does not need bureaucrats. Currently whether a promotion is valid or not is decided by stewards. See here for a guideline.

Requests for removal of access should be posted at the section below.


CheckUser access

See CheckUser policy for information about this user group and the policy governing the use of this tool.
  • To request CheckUser information, see Steward requests/Checkuser. This is the place to request CheckUser access.
  • One-time CheckUser access is not permitted and temporary access is only used by Stewards or when the mandate of the CUs has an expiry date specified in local policies.


Oversight access

See Oversight policy for information about this user group and the policy governing the use of this tool.
  • To request to have content oversighted, ask for a steward in #wikimedia-stewardsconnect and contact a steward privately. This section is for requesting access to the Oversight tool.
  • For contact details about oversighters across the wikis, refer to this page.
  • Note that temporary Oversight access is not permitted and temporary status is only used by Stewards .
  • When a new user is assigned to this group, please add them to this list.

Removal of access

  • If you're requesting the removal of your own permissions, make sure you're logged in to your account. If you have multiple flags, specify which you want removed. Stewards may delay your request a short time to ensure you have time to rethink your request (see previous discussion on 24 hour delays); the rights will not be restored by stewards once they are removed.
  • To request the removal of another user's permissions, you must gain consensus on the local wiki first. When there is community consensus that the user's access should be removed, provide a link to the discussion, with a brief explanation of the reason for the request, and summarize the results of discussion. However, as bureaucrats of some wikis may remove users from the administrator or bureaucrat group, please see also a separate list of these specific wikis.
  • To request the removal of another user's permissions for inactivity, link to your local inactivity policy. If your site does not have inactivity policy, the global policy Admin activity review applies.
  • See the instructions above for adding new requests. Please post new requests at the bottom of the section.

Remaling@cs.wikipedia

Status:    Not done

Please remove my sysop rights. Thank you. --Remaling (talk) 14:42, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On hold for 24h per our standard practice. RadiX∞ 15:58, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I cancel this request. I am sorry. --Remaling (talk) 14:40, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not done then. Defender (talk) 15:42, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vinhtantran@vi.wikipedia

Status:    Done

I would like my sysop rights to be removed in vi.wikipedia project. Thank you. Tân (talk) 21:19, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions. Matiia (talk) 00:01, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Matiia (talk) 00:53, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SpeedKing@lvwikipedia

Status:    Done

According to a community decision, administrators who have made less than 10 administrative action within the last 6 months are to be notified of the situation. Within the next 3 months, they have to explain their absence and decide whether they want to carry on. Should they fail to do that, their administrative rights are to be removed. SpeedKing was notified of the situation on July 22 and responded, that he doesn't need the admin flag anymore. --Edgars2007 (talk) 07:55, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:19, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Laurijs@lvwikipedia

Status:    Done

According to a community decision, administrators who have made less than 10 administrative action within the last 6 months are to be notified of the situation. Within the next 3 months, they have to explain their absence and decide whether they want to carry on. Should they fail to do that, their administrative rights are to be removed. Laurijs was notified of the situation on July 22 and did not respond. --Edgars2007 (talk) 07:55, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done with many thanks for their service. RadiX∞ 01:08, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Xil@lvwikipedia

Status:    Not done

According to a community decision, administrators who have made less than 10 administrative action within the last 6 months are to be notified of the situation. Within the next 3 months, they have to explain their absence and decide whether they want to carry on. Should they fail to do that, their administrative rights are to be removed. Xil was notified of the situation on July 22 and did not respond. --Edgars2007 (talk) 07:55, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. The user currently does not hold any advanced permission on lvwiki. RadiX∞ 01:11, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@RadiX: oh, kind of my fail. Didn't thought to check user rights... --Edgars2007 (talk) 08:48, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Edgars2007: No worries. RadiX∞ 10:01, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hannibal@svwikipedia

Status:    Done

In our yearly confirmation election, Hannibal did not reach the 90% support that is required, and his overights rights are therefor requested to be withdrawn. Hannibal has also accepted this removal.Yger (talk) 11:42, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Comment If this is done, then the oversight rights from the remaining oversighter Julle (talk · contribs) need to be removed as well until a second one is elected. See the discussion on the stewards' noticeboard. Trijnsteltalk 11:52, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes we are very aware of this. The voting and its ramifications have been thourougly discussed on our village pump.Yger (talk) 14:05, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Yger: Would you please link to a local policy requiring 90% support in order to retain CU/OS accesses? RadiX∞ 02:38, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
w:sv:Wikipedia:Censorer#ValYger (talk) 04:54, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done with many thanks for their service. RadiX∞ 10:10, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Urbourbo@svwikipedia

Status:    Done

Urbourbo's reelection for administratorship got 19 votes for and 9 votes against. This means U got around 67,85 % approving votes, which is not enough to keep the administrative tools. I was one of those who voted against, and arguably the most active debater in the "against"-side. As for myself, and probably everyone else who voted against, I believe 0 administrative actions taken during a full year is not enough for someone to keep the tools. No user has obligations, but on the other hand there is no Wikipedia-wide "human right" to have admin tools. It's a controversial topic on svwp wether inactivity should be enough to disqualify a canditate for administratorship, but at least this time, the candidate did not get enough support to keep the tools. Best regards, Skottniss (talk) 21:51, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done with many thanks for their work. RadiX∞ 10:38, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Julle@sv.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Please remove the oversight access (not the administrator access), since Julle is the only remaining oversighter in sv.wikipedia after the other oversighter Hannibal's oversight access has been removed. Svensson1 (talk) 00:35, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done as well, with thanks for their work. RadiX∞ 10:13, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jobbaren@sv.wikipedia

Status:    Done

It is one year since Jobbaren was elected to administrator, so it is time to do a new election, but Jobbaren is inactive since some time back, so no new election has taken place. Svensson1 (talk) 00:35, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done with many thanks for their service. RadiX∞ 01:14, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kruosio@sv.wikipedia

Status:    Done

It is one year since Kruosio was elected to administrator, so it is time to do a new election, but Kruosio is inactive since some time back, so no new election has taken place. Svensson1 (talk) 00:35, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done with many thanks for their service. RadiX∞ 01:15, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Whym@wikidatawiki

Status:    Done

Whym has not made the required 5 admin actions in the last 6 months. Please remove sysop. Rschen7754 00:44, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done, with thanks for their work. Defender (talk) 00:52, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Miscellaneous requests

Requests for permissions that don't fit in other sections belong here. Importer rights can be granted on most wikis by stewards only. Please gain local community consensus before posting a new section here.

Note that the following types of permissions requests belong on separate pages:

  • SRB — Local or global bot status
  • SRGP — Global permissions

See also

Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Permissions&oldid=17377105"