Wikipedia article depth
azərbaycanca (az) · башҡортса (ba) · беларуская (be) · English (en) · français (fr) · हिन्दी (hi) · Հայերեն (hy) · татарча/tatarça (tt) · українська (uk) · қазақша (kk) · русский (ru) · +/-
The depth or editing depth of Wikipedia is one of several possible rough indicators of the encyclopedia's collaborative quality.
Contents |
Definition[edit]
The formula assumes that a relatively high number of page edits and the presence of support pages means articles have been updated. And the latter support pages are assumed to be a more important factor.
In the list of Wikipedias, depth is currently defined as:
The depth can be simplified to the equivalent formula below:
NonArticles are talk pages, redirects and user pages. Total is simply NonArticles + Articles.
Article depth is a rough indicator of a Wikipedia’s quality, showing how frequently its articles are updated. It does not refer to academic quality, which cannot be computed, but to Wikipedian quality, i.e. the depth of collaborativeness—a descriptor that is highly relevant for a Wikipedia.
English Wikipedia has depth of 767 = 20.34 × 37.7 and is the deepest one for Wikipedias with number of articles greater than 10000. The largest depth according to the definition given above has the blocked Kanuri Wikipedia which has only 1 article and the depth is equal to 355886 = 52.93 × 6724. The largest depth for the unblocked Wikipedias has Ewe Wikipedia which has the depth 2605 = 7.4 × 352.19. The smallest depth has Aromanian Wikipedia which has the depth 3459.6152 = 60.29 × 57.3845.
Background[edit]
The measurement of depth was introduced after some limitations of the classic measurement of article count were realized. This insight is similar to the various suggestions to redefine the ordering of Wikipedias that appear on the international front page www.wikipedia.org. See Top Ten Wikipedias and Talk:Www.wikipedia.org portal.
Still in early February 2006 the list of Wikipedias only listed the article count. But on February 10, 2006, this changed into a table format that also listed the total edit count, number of users and admins.
The depth column first appeared on November 29, 2006. The initial definition was edits/articles, giving the English Wikipedia a value of 62. This definition changed already the next day to (Edits/Articles) × (Non-Articles/Articles), giving the English Wikipedia a value of 209. The next definition change occurred on October 9, 2007, when the Stub-ratio factor was appended. The stub ratio is (1-(Articles/Total)).[1] The new value for the English Wikipedia was 288. The formula changed again on October 17, October 28, and finally on April 11, 2008.
The discussion of the introduction of the depth parameter is found in Talk:List of Wikipedias/Archive 4. Early on, there were discussions of whether depth implies quality. The changes in October 2007 were discussed in Talk:List of Wikipedias/Archive 5#Depth 2.0.
Trends[edit]
The table shows how the depth of the largest 30 languages of Wikipedia has developed over time.
| Date | en | de | fr | pl | ja | it | nl | pt | es | ru | sv | zh | no | fi | ca | uk | tr | ro | vo | cs | hu | eo | sk | da | id | he | ar | ko | lt | sr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | 767 | 89 | 163 | 18 | 64 | 95 | 10 | 112 | 170 | 106 | 21 | 100 | 28 | 46 | 26 | 38 | 214 | 88 | 15 | 39 | 100 | 18 | 18 | 66 | 112 | 249 | 234 | 82 | 18 | 64 |
| 1 Jan 2009 | 413 | 81 | 115 | 9 | 41 | 57 | 23 | 66 | 94 | 74 | 24 | 71 | 20 | 32 | 17 | 15 | 95 | 30 | 8 | 28 | 64 | 13 | 10 | 26 | 30 | 177 | 117 | 36 | 15 | 52 |
| Change % in 2008 Q4 | +7 | +3 | +5 | +13 | +2 | +12 | +5 | +6 | +25 | +10 | +9 | +3 | +0 | +3 | +6 | +15 | +22 | +11 | +0 | +4 | +8 | +8 | +11 | +4 | +11 | +8 | +13 | +0 | +7 | +4 |
| 1 Dec 2008 | 408 | 80 | 113 | 9 | 41 | 54 | 22 | 65 | 88 | 72 | 23 | 70 | 20 | 32 | 17 | 14 | 89 | 29 | 8 | 28 | 61 | 13 | 10 | 26 | 30 | 174 | 110 | 36 | 15 | 51 |
| 1 Nov 2008 | 396 | 80 | 112 | 9 | 40 | 53 | 22 | 63 | 82 | 70 | 22 | 70 | 20 | 32 | 16 | 14 | 83 | 28 | 8 | 27 | 60 | 12 | 10 | 26 | 28 | 169 | 107 | 37 | 13 | 51 |
| 1 Oct 2008 | 386 | 79 | 110 | 8 | 40 | 51 | 22 | 62 | 75 | 67 | 22 | 69 | 20 | 31 | 16 | 13 | 78 | 27 | 8 | 27 | 59 | 12 | 9 | 25 | 27 | 164 | 104 | 36 | 14 | 50 |
| Change % in 2008 Q3 | +4 | +2 | +8 | +0 | +5 | +8 | +4 | +6 | +8 | +6 | +15 | +23 | +0 | +3 | +6 | +30 | +18 | +8 | +0 | +3 | +15 | +0 | +12 | +4 | +12 | +3 | -3 | +5 | +0 | +8 |
| 1 Sept 2008 | 376 | 78 | 105 | 8 | 39 | 50 | 21 | 61 | 73 | 66 | 21 | 65 | 20 | 31 | 16 | 12 | 74 | 26 | 8 | 26 | 58 | 12 | 9 | 24 | 26 | 164 | 99 | 35 | 14 | 49 |
| 1 Aug 2008 | 372 | 78 | 103 | 8 | 38 | 49 | 21 | 60 | 71 | 65 | 20 | 56 | 20 | 30 | 16 | 11 | 70 | 26 | 8 | 26 | 53 | 12 | 8 | 24 | 25 | 161 | 116 | 35 | 14 | 48 |
| 1 July 2008 | 368 | 77 | 101 | 8 | 38 | 47 | 21 | 58 | 69 | 63 | 19 | 56 | 20 | 30 | 15 | 10 | 66 | 25 | 8 | 26 | 51 | 12 | 8 | 24 | 24 | 159 | 108 | 34 | 14 | 46 |
| Change % in 2008 Q2 | +10 | +4 | +8 | +0 | +8 | +9 | +5 | +3 | +16 | +5 | +18 | -9 | +5 | +3 | +15 | -9 | +22 | +19 | +14 | +8 | +15 | +0 | +0 | +9 | +9 | +14 | +0 | +13 | +7 | +12 |
| 1 June 2008 | 357 | 76 | 98 | 8 | 37 | 45 | 21 | 62 | 67 | 60 | 18 | 64 | 19 | 30 | 14 | 10 | 63 | 24 | 8 | 25 | 49 | 12 | 7 | 23 | 24 | 158 | 110 | 32 | 13 | 45 |
| 1 May 2008 | 345 | 75 | 96 | 8 | 36 | 44 | 21 | 60 | 63 | 59 | 17 | 62 | 19 | 29 | 14 | 11 | 59 | 22 | 7 | 25 | 48 | 12 | 8 | 23 | 23 | 143 | 110 | 31 | 13 | 43 |
| 1 Apr 2008 | 334 | 74 | 93 | 8 | 35 | 43 | 20 | 56 | 59 | 60 | 16 | 62 | 19 | 29 | 13 | 11 | 54 | 21 | 7 | 24 | 44 | 12 | 8 | 22 | 22 | 139 | 108 | 30 | 13 | 41 |
| Change % in 2008 Q1 | +10 | +5 | +17 | -11 | +6 | +0 | +0 | +14 | +15 | +7 | +6 | +5 | +5 | +7 | -7 | -8 | +25 | +23 | +133 | +0 | +12 | +9 | +14 | +4 | +10 | +5 | +0 | +11 | +8 | +17 |
| 1 Mar 2008 | 321 | 74 | 90 | 8 | 20 | 62 | 16 | 18 | 28 | 22 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 Feb 2008 | 316 | 71 | 87 | 7 | 20 | 58 | 16 | 18 | 28 | 21 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 Jan 2008 | 302 | 70 | 79 | 9 | 33 | 43 | 20 | 49 | 51 | 56 | 15 | 59 | 18 | 27 | 14 | 12 | 43 | 17 | 3 | 24 | 39 | 11 | 7 | 21 | 20 | 132 | 107 | 27 | 12 | 35 |
| 1 Dec 2007 | ?? | ?? | ?? | ?? | ?? | ?? | ?? | ?? | ?? | ?? | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 Nov 2007 | 286 | 68 | 58 | 7 | 32 | 42 | 19 | 46 | 48 | 53 | 14 | 58 | 18 | 26 | 12 | 12 | 39 | 15 | 1 | 23 | 36 | 11 | 7 | 20 | 18 | 133 | 96 | 27 | 11 | 30 |
| Date | en | de | fr | pl | ja | it | nl | pt | es | ru | sv | zh | no | fi | ca | uk | tr | ro | vo | cs | hu | eo | sk | da | id | he | ar | ko | lt | sr |
| 1 Oct 2007 | 339 | 105 | 71 | 16 | 34 | 66 | 25 | 29 | 42 | 33 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 Sept 2007 | 331 | 104 | 69 | 16 | 37 | 62 | 24 | 30 | 41 | 33 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 Aug 2007 | 325 | 103 | 64 | 15 | 36 | 61 | 23 | 31 | 40 | 33 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 July 2007 | 320 | 100 | 59 | 15 | 36 | 59 | 23 | 31 | 39 | 32 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 June 2007 | 308 | 98 | 56 | 15 | 36 | 58 | 23 | 30 | 39 | 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 May 2007 | 293 | 95 | 52 | 14 | 35 | 54 | 22 | 29 | 38 | 29 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 Apr 2007 | 274 | 93 | 48 | 13 | 34 | 51 | 21 | 27 | 37 | 28 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 Mar 2007 | 254 | 91 | 45 | 13 | 34 | 60 | 21 | 28 | 36 | 27 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 Feb 2007 | 240 | 90 | 43 | 13 | 33 | 52 | 20 | 27 | 35 | 26 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 Jan 2007 | 224 | 87 | 45 | 12 | 32 | 37 | 19 | 25 | 34 | 24 |

