Talk:Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Making Broad Judgments About the Worthiness of a General Category of Article, and Who Are in Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad Articles, but That Doesn't Mean They Are Deletionists/Archives/2007
|Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in 2007, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion or the archives index.|
Do we as an association need a logo? I'd laugh if anyone could find an appropriate logo! I sure hope someone does though. I haven't managed to find one yet. Greeves - Treasurer 16:47, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Um, this is it. -- Zanimum 20:52, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
- As the article's appointed Secretary, I approve. Can we add a braille version of the logo, too? 184.108.40.206 19:04, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
LOL! I can't believe I didn't notice it! by the way, I believe that everyone is the secretary after the election. Greeves - Treasurer 00:12, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
What a shame. The word "Judgment" is misspelled in the title.
- Fixed it, thanks. Cbrown1023 21:13, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Harvard Case Study mention
Not a new member
Just to say I did give some thought to joining but I found the organisation too structured and the policy too rigid --220.127.116.11 15:08, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
The Abbreviation needs an Abbreviation
OK - from now on, I'm abbreviating the abbreviation to 'A' (Or is that 'initializing the intitialism'? - I never know).
I suggest A24D. --anon
It's good to have a middle ground - the deletionists annoy me more than words can express - but clearly there is a need to get rid of junk. So A is clearly the answer! 18.104.22.168 14:20, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Vereinigung von Wikipedianern, die ungern pauschale Urteile über die generelle Bedeutung einer Sorte Artikel fällen, und welche das Löschen besonders schlechter Artikel unterstützen, die aber deswegen keine Deletionisten/Löschtrolle sind. SARAzyn diSK 19:54, 21 August 2007 (UTC)