Jump to content

User talk:2A01:4F8:140:1046:0:0:0:2

Add topic
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Latest comment: 11 years ago by 2A01:4F8:140:1046:0:0:0:2 in topic Finally, the red octagon.

--Frigotoni ...i'm here; 16:09, 16 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

What the?

[edit]

I found myself inheriting this weird warning, and I checked my contribs, and saw that I made absolutely no edit before the warning. So it appears someone used my account as a test for their warning template, and I deleted it. Then I'm repeatedly reverted and banned. There has also been absolutely no message to me whatsoever. I always wondered how so many people get banned. 2A01:4F8:140:1046:0:0:0:2 21:00, 10 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

{{unblock declined|1=See above |2=You're using an open proxy, [[NOP|which may be blocked at any time]] and in fact is blocked for abusive edits on a number of wikis. Also [//meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meta:Sandbox&diff=prev&oldid=6006780 this edit on the Sandbox] does not really make me think you would make any edits of interest here if unblocked. --<small>[[User:MF-Warburg|MF-W]]</small> 21:15, 10 October 2013 (UTC)}}2A01:4F8:140:1046:0:0:0:2 21:09, 10 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

And if that wasn't enough

[edit]

There has been no message on my talkpage, not even the annoying red stop sign. 2A01:4F8:140:1046:0:0:0:2 21:02, 10 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Finally, the red octagon.

[edit]

Apparently, editing the sandbox can get one blocked. Well, I'm pretty darn sure that's not what I'm really blocked for. I'm really blocked because an admin made a mistake and is not especially willing to admit the mistake and so tries to find other excuses, namely sandbox edits. Who cares--I don't need a Wikimedia account, although this shows how annoying and bureaucratic this place is. 2A01:4F8:140:1046:0:0:0:2 21:26, 10 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Think about it. The best reason given is that the Admin thinks I will not help with any "edits of interest" if not blocked, and pointed out absolutely nothing disruptive done by me. What wiki would really ban/block someone who didn't do anything disruptive just because it believes he/she is unlikely to contribute? --2A01:4F8:140:1046:0:0:0:2