User talk:Junedude433

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Junedude433, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! RFD (talk) 20:33, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mike Amyx[edit]

The article Mike Amyx has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. SSSB (talk) 20:30, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 25[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lawrence, Kansas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clinton Lake (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm impressed...[edit]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	I'm really impressed with all the improvements you have made to the Lawrence, KS page. The article looks great! As a fellow Kansan, I applaud your hard work.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 02:29, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Gen. Quon: You should see me on the simple English Wikipedia! I literally wrote that article from the ground up, and I created like 20+ related pages too! It's also likely about to be a Good Article, possibly a Featured Article! ~Junedude433 (talk) 02:35, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wow, I didn't even know about that. Good job, dude!--Gen. Quon (Talk) 03:01, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alicia Lemke for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alicia Lemke is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alicia Lemke until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kncny11 ^(shoot) 18:04, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Autobahn Polizei[edit]

The article Autobahn Polizei has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No WP:SIGCOV

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JBchrch talk 17:27, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Autobahn Polizei moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Autobahn Polizei, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JBchrch talk 04:49, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Richard Handley (physician) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Richard Handley (physician). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 19:17, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Richard Handley (physician) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Richard Handley (physician). Thanks! Rusalkii (talk) 04:48, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Junedude433/Draft:Baqibillah Mishkat Chowdhury moved to draftspace[edit]

I've moved your draft to draftspace where I assume it was meant to be. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 23:51, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declare any connection[edit]

Hello Junedude433. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Baqibillah Mishkat Chowdhury, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Junedude433. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Junedude433|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:41, 29 January 2022 (UTC) Acknowledged and fixed. Apologies for the late response. ~Junedude433 (talk) 19:49, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022[edit]

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Junedude433, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Junedude433|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia.
While you are declaring this correctly on articles that you edit I cannot see this declaration on you user page for all articles you are paid to edit, nor have I see a reply to the prior message. I see you are a user of UpWork by your declarations elsewhere Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 11:00, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Given the fact that I have been paid for multiple different articles, what do you recommend how I go about declaring the multiple "employers" for the various articles? Just simply having a template for each one individually? I feel that would create unnecessary clutter. ~Junedude433 (talk) 17:51, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You must declare them all individually and openly From what I can see, you have declared none of them. You have also ignored the request for information by @Worldbruce above, so you seem to be declaring now only when forced to. Perhaps you would address that, please. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 18:50, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. ~Junedude433 (talk) 19:49, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. How many articles in total have you made paid contributions to, please, and which. Please be absolutely transparent? Drafts are also part of this. I note that you have made three declarations on your user page in this permalink. One is unspecific and thus suggests 100% of your contributions have been for pay, two others are specific.

So, where, please is your declaration for Draft:Baqibillah Mishkat Chowdhury as an example of work that you have performed? Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 23:00, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I only began doing paid work beginning in January 2022. Anything before then was 100% voluntary. I have only performed paid work for three articles, which I have declared: Draft:Richard Handley (physician), some edits on Tapout (clothing brand), and Draft:Baqibillah Mishkat Chowdhury. I used the paid templates provided to me in your first comment. It's not my fault if they don't format properly for user pages. All of the information is in the source code anyway. ~Junedude433 (talk) 02:48, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It was not hard to correct the format. I have done that for you.

Note, also "Paid editors must provide links to the user page(s) of their Wikipedia account(s) on each website on which they advertise, solicit or obtain paid editing services, as well as in direct communications with each client and potential client (such as through email). If the paid editor has used or controlled more than one Wikipedia account, each account must be disclosed." and "Paid editors must provide links on their Wikipedia user page to all active accounts at websites where they advertise, solicit or obtain paid Wikipedia-editing services. If such an account is deleted or removed, any corresponding links on the Wikipedia user page must remain visible for at least one week" This is from Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure

Please comply with this. You have not yet shown full compliance with the policy. You should not have to be pushed on this. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 08:50, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 20:18, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alice and the Glass Lake for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alice and the Glass Lake is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alice and the Glass Lake until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 23:06, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard Handley (physician) (March 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Also, IMDB, Vimeo and LinkedIn are not reliable sources so should be used.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Richard Handley (physician) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Richard Handley (physician), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 18:11, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Junedude433! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 18:11, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Autobahn Polizei[edit]

Hello, Junedude433. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Autobahn Polizei, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tim Kraska has been accepted[edit]

Tim Kraska, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:59, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Zachary Lemnios[edit]

Hello, Junedude433. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Zachary Lemnios, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:07, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Richard Handley (physician)[edit]

Hello, Junedude433. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Richard Handley (physician), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Zachary Lemnios[edit]

Hello, Junedude433. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Zachary Lemnios".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:22, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Richard Handley (physician)[edit]

Hello, Junedude433. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Richard Handley".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:33, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Baqibillah Mishkat Chowdhury[edit]

Hello, Junedude433. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Baqibillah Mishkat Chowdhury, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:04, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Baqibillah Mishkat Chowdhury[edit]

Hello, Junedude433. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Baqibillah Mishkat Chowdhury".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:50, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]