Article validation proposals/Page 4

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

The Article validation proposals have been split into multiple pages to keep them at a manageable size.

All | Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 | Page 4| New

Contents 1 Summary of Validation Proposals 1.1 Automated Heuristics 1.2 Individual Voting on Individual Articles 1.3 Centralized, Hierarchichally-appointed Committees 1.4 Anyone can approve an article 1.5 "Anyone" can approve an article(subject to approval by centralized committee) 1.6 Disapproval Models 1.7 Social Networking 1.8 Approval by voting 1.9 Automated Trust Networks

[edit] Summary of Validation Proposals

[edit] Automated Heuristics

• Trust metrics
• DWheeler's Proposal: Automated Heuristics
• PeterK's Proposal: Scoring

[edit] Individual Voting on Individual Articles

• Kevin's proposal

[edit] Centralized, Hierarchichally-appointed Committees

• Validation by committee
• Foundation wiki approval proposal
• Magnus Manske's proposal
• Andrew A's proposal
• Editorial board(s)
• Hawstom's proposal

[edit] Anyone can approve an article

• David Levinson's proposal (revised Jan 2005)
• Giles Robertson's proposal

[edit] "Anyone" can approve an article(subject to approval by centralized committee)

• Sanger's proposal
• Bryce's proposal
• Maurreen's proposal 2: "Reviewed articles"
• Endorsement idea

[edit] Disapproval Models

• Legion of Trolls proposal

[edit] Social Networking

[edit] Approval by voting

• Maureen's proposal 1
• ChrisG's template and process

[edit] Automated Trust Networks

• DWheeler's Proposal: Automated Heuristics
• Risk's Proposal

See also

• w:Whuffie
• w:Slashdot's karma ratings
• w:Ebay's feedback ratings
• Advogato and trust metrics
• Trust and the semantic web