Cross-wiki arbitration committee (2007 proposal)/Accepted cases/Yiddish Wikipedia
|This page is kept for historical interest. Any policies mentioned may be obsolete. If you want to revive the topic, you can use the talk page or start a discussion on the community forum.|
|Cross-wiki arbitration committee (arbitration case)|
|This is a proposed process to resolve disputes such as the Yiddish Wikipedia case. It is not currently active. This is an arbitration case concerning a dispute on the Yiddish Wikipedia. Do not edit this page unless you've read and understood the arbitration process. All content on this page may be edited by arbiters to maintain format and order.|
|Brief summary||Do not edit this box; the arbiters will do so.|
Phase one: presentation 
Summary of dispute 
Describe the case below very briefly (in no more than 500 words). This should be a fair summary of the case, presenting no arguments and making no judgments as to the validity of any user's positions.
Yidel alleges that Shmaltz abuses administrator tools by constantly blocking users against Wikimedia policy and deleting articles in conflicts of interest. Yidel answers, that since shmaltz isn't active he must revert and sometimes hurt vandals feelings, and he uses each day other names not to be intimidated by the exposing of his privacy which was done numerous times. Edit here.
Shmaltz alleges that he has no choice but to block Yidel because he is disruptive by constantly edit warring with sock puppets and hurting other users' feelings.
Attempts at resolution 
Briefly list previous attempts to reach agreement through the dispute resolution process.
- Invitations to neutral users:
- Request for comment (14 January—22 April 2007)
Agreement to arbitrate 
All users must agree that any decision taken by the arbitration committee is binding and final. Although the committee may modify a decision if new evidence is provided, it has no obligation to do so. If you agree to abide by said decision, sign your name below by typing "* ~~~".