Research talk:Brazil Readers Survey 2011 Findings

Number of people who answered this survey[edit]

May we have access? --Ezalvarenga (talk) 20:57, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I saw quickly now the full report, 250 answers. Is this significant for Brazil? I cannot read now the report, but how were those 250 choosen? --Ezalvarenga (talk) 21:01, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tom, it's usually ramdom among a sample (in this case, divided in 2 main groups: casual readers ("those who read Wikipedia articles at least once per month but less than 4 times per month on average) and avid readers ("those who read Wikipedia articles at least 4+ times per month on average). More details on the methodology should be asked to Mani or Ayush (none is no longer at WMF). --Oona (WMF) (talk) 21:16, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And I do recommend the reading of the report.--Oona (WMF) (talk) 21:17, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oona, I will read when I finish my things. I saw this division among the 250 people of the sample, but my main question is how significant is this number of 250 for the Brazilian statistics. There were 4000 answers and 250 were within Brazil, if I understood well. Maybe someone still in WMF knows how people were invited to answer the survey? --Ezalvarenga (talk) 21:32, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]