Talk:False community

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

[edit] Why?

Is it a theory? Then it should explain that it is a theory. Perhaps it would be linked to "definitions" or other descriptions of "community". Since this is not a wikipedia article but rather a potentially usable debate term, it is well and fine to just assert that some may claim that risks have to be physical, to the body, but in order to connect the term to an ongoing discussion, it would perhaps be well to elaborate (speculations allowed) on possible consequences on claiming the necessity of physical risk to claim it a community. If a physical risk is necessary (then disclaiming social shame), does it properly dismiss the presence of a community? Is risk a critical mechanism for upholding a society, really? rursus 14:37, 12 May 2009 (UTC)