Meta has no ability to override my block of you on simplewiki. Jimbo, has not ability to override it either. You know this and you are just being a pain. Keep it up and you'll find yourself unable to edit meta as well. Kind regards, ... fr33kman 22:29, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Request for unblock 
- I have shortened your block to 1 day here. fr33kman 08:48, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
- And, in turn, I will drop the issue on Meta. I do believe the extension of my SimWP block from two weeks to indef was excessive, though, especially since you didn't mention it on AN, tag my talk page about it, or un-talkblock me to request an unblock Purplebackpack89 10:11, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
Global bans policy discussion 
At Requests for comment/Global bans, where you have commented in support of Option 2, a third option has recently been implemented. The first two options did not prove a way for respondents to indicate that they oppose global bans entirely, i.e., that it is not possible to write a meaningful global bans policy that would attract their support. Option 3 is intended to provide that opportunity, and to aid in distinguishing between people who oppose the proposed policy because it requires improvements and those who oppose the proposed policy because no policy permitting global bans should be adopted.
Because the third section was added late by a respondent, it is possible that some people who responded early in the RFC have commented at option 2, but would really prefer to support option 3, or support both. If so, you may voluntarily choose to move your original comment or to or strikethrough your original comment and add new comments. This is a courtesy notice of the change, and there is no requirement that you take any action. WhatamIdoing (talk) 15:58, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, but I did want Option 2 (fix it) rather than Option 3 (oppose it) Purplebackpack89 17:40, 14 July 2012 (UTC)