維基媒體基金會董事會公告欄/撤銷James Heilman職務一事之相關問答集

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
This page is a translated version of the page Wikimedia Foundation Board noticeboard/James Heilman removal FAQ and the translation is 42% complete.
Other languages:

維基媒體基金會的董事會在2015年12月底撤銷James Heilman的董事職務，這個動作引起了維基媒體郵件群組、維基頁面、以及許多私下對話中諸多對董事們的質疑。現任董事們已經從最常見的問題中，彙整了對這些提問的答案。

事情經過是？

  • The Board discussed the topic for several weeks, and the Chair called a special meeting to discuss the matter. During that meeting, after careful consideration, the Board voted to approve a resolution removing Heilman from his position, effective immediately.

為什麼董事會成員相信他們無法再與James共事？

  • A majority of Board members were of the opinion that James was unable or unwilling to maintain certain Trustee commitments around confidentiality, judgment, and discretion. This was not the result of any single action or opinion of James. This was not about a specific action, discussion, or disagreement over broader strategic issues. Many of the Trustees simply felt as though they had lost confidence in James' ability to meet his obligations as a Trustee, and, in their opinion, James would not be able to regain that confidence.
  • Confidence regarding Trustee business is very important to the Board. We are often called on to consider sensitive information and make important decisions in our roles as Trustees. This may involve governance of the Wikimedia Foundation, for example through the Board Human Resources Committee, or guidance on movement issues, such as our work with the Affiliation Committee or the Funds Dissemination Committee. Loss in confidence in one Board member affects the full Board's ability to do its work.
  • In addition to the sensitive information we may handle, some processes or conversations need to be confidential while they are under consideration, so that we can have full, frank, and informed conversations. Even though we are committed to transparency about the outcomes of our decisions, it is important that we are confident we can trust each other as we make decisions together. There are processes and protocols to express dissent and disagreement that ensure full participation and consideration of challenging issues for all Board members.
  • The majority of the remaining Board members felt that they and James were not able to agree on a common path forward. Despite several weeks of efforts, many of us held the opinion that we could not move forward effectively with James on the Board. Ultimately, given that, we felt it was necessary to resolve this before it further hindered the Board's ability to do its work, especially before two new members joined the Board.

撤銷職務的法理依據為何？

  • The Bylaws of the Wikimedia Foundation allow any Trustee to be removed, with or without cause, by a majority vote of the Trustees then in office. See Bylaws, Article IV, Section 7.
  • Although the Wikimedia Foundation's offices are now located in San Francisco, California, it was originally founded in St. Petersburg, Florida. We are a 501(c)(3) charity incorporated under the Florida nonprofit statutes.

為何董事會要在長假期間作出這項行動？

  • The Board has been discussing and working with James on this issue for several weeks. Ultimately, we felt it was necessary to resolve before the new term for appointed Trustees. This unfortunately put us into the holiday season for many of our colleagues and community.

James是否有權取得董事會的決策文件？

  • Yes. James had - as all of us - access to all documents and information which he needed for his work and decision-making on the Board.

James是否仍然可以在維基媒體運動中擔任其他貢獻角色？

  • James has proven himself as a Wikimedian in a variety of movement roles, outside the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees. This decision is not about his work in other capacities. We look forward to his future contributions to the movement.

為什麼董事會沒有立即發布這項訊息？

  • In most circumstances, messages and statements on major decisions can be prepared in advance. Although we considered some potential draft announcements before last week's meeting, it wasn't possible to finalize any single statement. The meeting was to discuss the issue, including possible alternative outcomes. We wanted our discussion to be full and resolved, in order to inform our intended message.
  • The Board has a responsibility to maintain discretion to protect everyone involved and the Foundation. We initially wanted to work with James to agree on a mutual statement. As that appeared unlikely to happen in a timely fashion, we have been preparing this FAQ and carefully ensuring that we respond to questions where we can.
  • Ultimately, we have many responsibilities to uphold, high among them being our commitment to keeping the community informed. At the same time, we must balance that with our desire to do what we feel is in the best interests of the movement, and our wish to be respectful and fair to James.

為什麼董事會不願意提供更多相關細節？

  • Transparency is one of the core values of the Wikimedia movement, but legally and ethically the Board is obligated to maintain a certain level of confidentiality to ensure frank conversations to reach the best decisions and to be respectful of others. We have an obligation to govern the Foundation on behalf of the public, in a way that requires some confidentiality and discretion. At the same time, we have to balance sharing information that enables the community to make informed decisions.
  • The majority of Trustees come from the community, so we understand the community's strong desire to have full information about any given issue. Sometimes the balance of providing accurate information, without getting into details about sensitive specifics, means that we can't fully satisfy everyone. At times, this can be frustrating for you, and can be challenging for us.

為了填補缺額，已經做了哪些事情？

  • 董事會正在諮詢2015維基媒體基金會選舉委員會來提供想法。這是最優先要做的事情，同時我們也詢問了基金會的職工來提供任何所需的支持與資源來保證諮詢成果的順利。

董事會是否將支持並接納下一任由社群選出的董事當選人？

  • We are fully committed to filling the open community-selected seat through a transparent process, and look forward to welcoming the next eligible community-selected Trustee. The Board currently has six members who were active in the community prior to their involvement on the Board. We anticipate that number will be seven once the vacancy left by this removal is filled. We are fully committed to helping the new community-selected Trustee be successful in their role.

James是否有資格可以再次競選，成為社群選出的董事席次候選人？

  • Due to the removal from the Board, James is not eligible to be a candidate for the Board until the 2017 community selection process. Under the Bylaws, the Board oversees the rules and procedures for the community-selection process. If the Board determines that a candidate does not meet eligibility criteria, it may decline to appoint the candidate to the Board.

為什麼有些董事是指派而非民選而出的？

  • The Wikimedia Foundation bylaws were written in accordance with Florida law and nonprofit governance best practices to serve the unique characteristics of our movement. The Wikimedia Foundation is not legally a "membership organization" — we work to serve the full public and all audiences. The Bylaws allow the community to select some seats in order to ensure the Board retains community experience, and serves the international, decentralized nature of the Wikimedia community.

是否未來將會有獨立調查？

  • The Board resolution was fully in compliance with Board Bylaws and legal requirements. We took this action as part of our obligation to effective governance of the Wikimedia Foundation. We are confident in the process and outcome. We will not conduct any further inquiries.

為什麼董事會議紀錄不能公開？

  • The Board often handles sensitive or confidential information as part of its governance obligations. Public meetings make it more difficult for the Board to function effectively as the Wikimedia Foundation's governance body. This does not diminish our commitment to our values of transparency and accountability. We publish Board minutes and resolutions, and we openly and transparently maintain our governance standards and processes in the Board Handbook. Half of our Trustees are nominated to the Board through transparent, open processes, and as such, are accountable to the Foundation and movement, including its various communities.

董事會的下一步以及優先順序是什麼？

  • We are committed to a Board that represents the community and strive for the highest standards for governance. This is necessary to effectively make decisions on the Wikimedia Foundation's support for the Wikimedia movement. As such, filling the open community-selected seat is a top priority. We intend to make an announcement on the roadmap for filling that seat in the coming week.
  • We want to improve our ability to communicate important information as quickly and clearly as possible. We will continue to have conversations among ourselves, and with you on how to progress in this area. We welcome your feedback and suggestions on the Board noticeboard.
  • We are also focused on supporting the community and staff to finalize the Wikimedia Foundation strategic plan. More information on the Wikimedia Foundation's strategic plan development efforts will be coming throughout the month of January.
  • One of our next priorities is the success of the new Trustees who will join us over the coming weeks. We will welcome and support the new community Trustee who will step into the vacant community-selected seat, as well as the new appointed Trustees.
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard/James_Heilman_removal_FAQ/zh&oldid=25807930"