Dispute resolution analysis group/Essays

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

This is a collection of essays written by participants in the dispute resolution analysis group.

Contents

Submissions [edit]

Essays should focus on dispute resolution in WMF projects. They should be relevant to a broader understanding of disputes and dispute resolution, an informed and reasoned critique of the current system(s), and/or to providing pragmatic solutions for reasonable criticisms and problem areas.

Review process [edit]

Volunteers are encouraged to review the essays of other participants. Authors are encouraged to revise their work in accord with reasonable feedback and critiques. There is no formal peer-review or publishing process. Instead, we rely on standard feedback and discussion. While this is a wiki, please do not make significant revisions to another essay unless the author has indicated that it's an "open" essay or the changes have been discussed with the author.

Essays [edit]

General [edit]

General observations and commentary about broad trends and behaviors.

Processes [edit]

Observations, commentary and analysis on specific processes.

Cases [edit]

Commentary and analysis on specific cases.

Breakdowns [edit]

Observations and analysis of failures (by groups and trends) in dispute resolution.

Proposals [edit]

Proposed reforms and solutions for dispute resolution.

Miscellaneous [edit]

Essays that, while relevant, do not fit into another category.