From Meta
[edit] Gilaki Wikiversity
| Discussion |
verification |
final decision |
 |
This language has been verified as eligible.
Although the language is eligible for a project, the community still needs to meet some requirements described in the language proposal policy. In the meantime, you can discuss the creation of this language project on this page. (See an unofficial analysis of this request.) |
|
| Proposal summary |
| Language details:
|
Users interested in forming an editing community:
Add N beside users that are native speakers, and P beside the original proposers' names.
|
| Relevant pages:
|
| External links:
|
| Please read Meta:Language proposal policy for help using this template correctly. |
[edit] Arguments in favour
- Strong support-- we whant to have Gilaki Wikiversity.--AminSanaei 09:09, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Ali 13:11, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Simple votes will be ignored in accordance with the Language proposal policy. Crochet.david 08:35, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- Simple vote? Are you sure you saw my argument below? --Ali 13:58, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- Here, it's the vote, there it's the discussion, a discussion may be not a argument, so duplicate here your argument to make counted the vote and to make easier the work of the language subcommittee.Crochet.david 15:57, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- i can teach gilaki grammerfarshid 07:15, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
we are intrested in survey on gilaki language213.217.32.90 07:19, 7 March 2008 (UTC)alborz
i can write in gilaki about art213.217.32.90 07:23, 7 March 2008 (UTC)carol
- by same IP, different people? --Ali 11:24, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- we are a family cant we send message from one computer?whyfarshid 08:05, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Arguments against
- This is one out of 5 proposals for a Gilaki wiki. Though Limburgish has so many proposals too there's a difference. There's no activity and Gilaki does not seem to be ready get for a Wikibooks, a Wikinews, a Wikiquote, a Wiktionary nor a Wikiversity. Maybe this will change in the future but not now. If there's any activity shown, I'll become in favour of this request. --OosWesThoesBes 15:56, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] General discussion
Although i support this project and i hope to having separate sub-domain, but i'm not sure to having at least 10 native & active contributers. --Ali 13:11, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Incubator