WebCite/supporters: Difference between revisions
< WebCite
Content deleted Content added
Crisco 1492 (talk | contribs) s |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==People interested== |
==People interested== |
||
<!-- Add your name to the end of the list with #~~~ --> |
<!-- Add your name to the end of the list with #~~~ --> |
||
{{div col}} |
|||
#I've already donated, but yes, we need this. I've used it at least 1500 times in my writing [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) |
#I've already donated, but yes, we need this. I've used it at least 1500 times in my writing [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) |
||
#The proposal, initiated [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28technical%29&oldid=537387610#a_heads-up_--_webcitation.org_may_go_dark here], has my full support. I believe WMF should consider a cooperation with WebCite and support them with part of the WMF funds. In relation to this, the ''Spending'' section citing a criticism of money being spent on things that may be valid, such as photos of pop concerts at the German Chapter's wikimedia project, but should be lower on the WMF's priority list in comparison to such things as prevention of [[en:link rot|link rot]], was also added by me to the English WP article on [[en:Wikimedia Foundation|The Foundation]], but was removed by editor [[en:User talk:The ed17|The ed17]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikimedia_Foundation&diff=534997166&oldid=534526683 here] altogether. --[[User:DancingPhilosopher|DancingPhilosopher]] ([[User talk:DancingPhilosopher|talk]]) 16:43, 9 February 2013 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- Add your name above this line --> |
<!-- Add your name above this line --> |
||
{{div col end}} |
|||
Revision as of 16:43, 9 February 2013
People interested
- I've already donated, but yes, we need this. I've used it at least 1500 times in my writing Crisco 1492 (talk)
- The proposal, initiated here, has my full support. I believe WMF should consider a cooperation with WebCite and support them with part of the WMF funds. In relation to this, the Spending section citing a criticism of money being spent on things that may be valid, such as photos of pop concerts at the German Chapter's wikimedia project, but should be lower on the WMF's priority list in comparison to such things as prevention of link rot, was also added by me to the English WP article on The Foundation, but was removed by editor The ed17 here altogether. --DancingPhilosopher (talk) 16:43, 9 February 2013 (UTC)