User talk:Cbrown1023

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
This is an archived version of this page, as edited by לערי ריינהארט (talk | contribs) at 16:43, 24 December 2007 (→‎Welcome_to_vikipedye_vikiverterbukh_and_vikibiblyotek: Fixed interwiki links; They should be project independend. ...). It may differ significantly from the current version.
NOTICE OF WIKIBREAK
I will be on a wikibreak from 15 December to 2 January, due to holiday. If you would like to contact me, please leave a note on my talk page or e-mail me, but please remember that I might not be able to respond until I return from this break. Thank you. Cbrown1023 talk

Welcome to my talk page.
2007 · 2008 · 2009
2010 · 2011 · 2012
2013

Japanese translation of Licensing policy

I made last copyedit to the translation, so would you like to update WMF website to the latest version on meta? Kzhr 05:39, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Published, thanks again! :-) Cbrown1023 talk 21:00, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New user

See http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&user=Cbrown10. If this isn't you then this account should probably be blocked as it was probably created to mislead people into thinking it is you. Adambro 22:00, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up! As we discussed on IRC, I think I'm going to wait until he edits before we do anything about him, just in case he means well and is not really an impostor. Cbrown1023 talk 22:31, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cbrown. I was wondering if the image above should replace Image:OTRS Wikimedia.svg. I'm not exactly sure were to check :) to see if it should. Thanks, Mønobi 20:43, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but you should probably check with guillom about that. :-) Cbrown1023 talk 20:53, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Translation requests/WMF/Dewan Pengawas

Sorry for taking long :) I've changed the translation status for id to 'finished' after a quick read a while. Thanks. ~Rex••talk•• 03:02, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay. Thanks, I've published it. :-) Cbrown1023 talk 03:19, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My steward election

Thank you for supporting my steward election having passed with 72-1-4-99%.--Jusjih 02:47, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I know you'll do a good job as steward; congratulations! :-) Cbrown1023 talk 03:36, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orientation

Hi CB. Just comparing |the differences. You can see I'm no expert on wikistuff so excuse any naughties. The main thing I have picked up over the years is the the problem people have with getting orientated. I hadn't realized one needs a new account for every Wikimedia domain until getting stuck into things.

1, That's why i think this para is important.

One of the problems for all of us, as you probably know, is with having so many User accounts. So please make sure you list as many as you think are useful, preferably on your meta User account. like CB has. (And you think you're busy!) Anyone (newly) coming to the CPG page will likely to be arriving because its linked off the meta.wikimedia front page. It's likely they will be trying to find ways to communicate across projects. They will have multiple user accounts and, unlike yu, may not have seen the need for the meta user account to be used as a way of centralizing things, and talking from the one page.

2 With the proposal system going through a restructuring = no clear way to make a prop and find peers who will support it, and then 'plug' it into the 'mainstream'; or else discovering that there is no one who see its need and so burying it = we have this down time to (at least) reconsider new comms tools that are more user friendly and practical. It seems Wikimedia is guilty, like most software developers, of attempting to make a screw driver out of a hammer.

You've seen I've suggested on the group's talk page that it's a collaboratory. This means testing (comms) tools in a systematic manner until we find one that complements wiki library builders. Skypecast is the first, and one size won't fit all. Enough. Have a good break and we'll look at this in the new year. --Simonfj 00:31, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I changed most of it is because it would probably need more discussion to reflect something on our "main page" and that used "we" (implying consensus). Perhaps you could bring this up on the mailing list or at one of our meetings? Cbrown1023 talk 03:35, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One pedantry note. You can't have interest ON something. One can only have interest IN something.

Yes. :-) But I changed the part that said put it ON the specific page. Cbrown1023 talk 03:35, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Cbrown1023! Thanks for creating accounts at vikipedye – װיקיפּעדיע,‎ vikiverterbukh – װיקיװערטערבוך and at vikibiblyotek – װיקיביבליאָטעק.‎ You are welcome to visit our IRC channel #kavehoyz. Best regards
‫·‏לערי ריינהארט‏·‏Th‏·‏T‏·‏email me‏·‏‬ 16:43, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Fixed interwiki links; They should be project independend.