From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
[edit] Low Saxon Wikinews
| Discussion |
verification |
final decision |
 |
This language has been verified as eligible.
Although the language is eligible for a project, the community still needs to meet some requirements described in the language proposal policy. In the meantime, you can discuss the creation of this language project on this page. (See an unofficial analysis of this request.) |
|
| Proposal summary |
| Language details:
|
Users interested in forming an editing community:
Add N beside users that are native speakers, and P beside the original proposers' names.
|
| Relevant pages:
|
| External links:
|
| Please read Meta:Language proposal policy for help using this template correctly. |
Low Saxon is a language without own vital media. There are no daily newspapers, no TV program, no radio station fully dedicated to the language. And no press agencies of course. Where Wikinews in other languages has massive competion by other media, Low Saxon Wikinews could be a real useful news source and bridge a market gap. Especially dedicated to news about the language, which are sparse in other non-Low Saxon media. --::Slomox:: >< 18:04, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Arguments in favour
- Support. I support the creation of a Low Saxon Wikinews site, with the proviso that it be a shared German/Dutch effort. There are currently Dutch organisations which bring their news on their websites and German organisations which report on German developments, with very little sharing. A Low Saxon Wikinews site could be the place for both communities to have a peek at what's going on across the spectrum. The dialect of each news item can be as per the development it reports on, or else as per the contributor. Ni'jluuseger 18:41, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- Sehe der Wikipedia, es ist sehr aktiv, so eine Wikineus wird auch aktiv. Deutschlehrer 14:01, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- There are many pages. --OosWesThoesBes 18:17, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Arguments against
- It is a dialect, I don't believe this is a language to begin with. (Red4tribe 04:29, 21 April 2008 (UTC))
- There is no agreed upon distinction in linguistics between 'dialects' and 'languages'. Any variety of speech is just about as complex and complete as any other. And until fairly recently, most speakers of Low Saxon could only speak (their variety of) Low Saxon - not the national standard language. Would you have it that they were speaking 'a dialect' whereas people whose speech happened to coincide (more or less) with what was to become the standard language were speaking 'a language' all along?
- Ni'jluuseger 19:40, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose - Please do not create another project in a dialect/sub-language that doesn't even have a real standardization. This will properly only results in same region based articles. --Jeroen 02:27, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
- Please rephrase that in Dutch. Your English statement lacks standardization (or sense). --::Slomox:: >< 21:10, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
[edit] General discussion
[edit] Localisation update
- Currently 100.00% of the MediaWiki messages and 65.17% of the messages of the extensions used by the Wikimedia Foundation projects have been localised. Please help us help your language by localising at Betawiki. This is the recent localisation activity for your language. Thanks, GerardM 10:36, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
- Currently 98.08% of the MediaWiki messages and 47.00% of the messages of the extensions used by the Wikimedia Foundation projects have been localised. Localisation of these messages is a requirement before your request is finally assessed. This is the recent localisation activity for your language. Thanks, GerardM 11:13, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
