User talk:Slomox

From Meta

Willkommen zur Meta und vielen Dank fuer dein Korrekturlesen.

Hier liegen einige nuetzbare Linken:

• Hauptseiten: de - en
• Neuigkeiten: en
• Übersetzungsanträge: de - en
  • Foudationsrundbriefe: Translation requests/WQ/2
• Meta:Babel: "Ich brauche hilfe" auf meta fuer alle Sprachen.
  • Babylon: Portal Übersetzung
• Categories: Liste der Hauptkategorien auf Meta

Auf meta liegen es nicht nur englische aber auch deutsche Dokumente. Kurz, Willkommen und viel Spass!

--Aphaia | WQ2翻訳中 | talk 01:39, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Contents 1 re: Metapub#Local Meta 2 babel 3 User language box translation 4 the language policy has a defined way of assessing a language 5 Westfalian

[edit] re: Metapub#Local Meta

Hello Slomox ! I've answered you message at Metapub#Local Meta .

(Though I'm afraid I have not understand the troubles you were pointing out, becouse Meta can manage those page. I have not undestood something?)

Please also look at Metapub/Archives/2007-09#Metapub in italian language? and Metapub/Archives/2007-09#Where does we manage same-language projects cooperation and collaboration? . I discussed there maters to have Meta more usefull to non-English user. (I talk about Italian projects there, but the same can be said about other language projects). --ChemicalBit - talk 16:13, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] babel

Please subst: Babel will be deleted. Ælsån 18:27, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] User language box translation

Hello Slomox. Thank you very much for translating {{user language}}. The template has recently been changed to add two new levels, 0 and 4 (see detailed descriptions). Please update Template:User language/nds:

• 0: this user cannot read or write Plattdüütsch.
• 4: this user can contribute at a near-native level in Plattdüütsch. —{admin} Pathoschild 00:14:55, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. :) —{admin} Pathoschild 02:33:32, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] the language policy has a defined way of assessing a language

Hoi, It is plain, when a language is accepted as such by the ISO-639-3, a language is eligible. When you object for whatever reason, you get into the notion of POV and POV pushing. The current method is objective and observable. Thanks, GerardM 09:10, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

I'm indeed pushing a POV, the "fact POV", and the POV of the language proposal policy, which says: The language must be sufficiently unique that it could not coexist on a more general wiki. Please comment on this (on the proposal page). --::Slomox:: >< 12:45, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Westfalian

Hoi, for your information, you can continue to argue and vote and stuff. It does not work that way; when the status is eligible we read opinions but we do not care for votes any more. Thanks, GerardM 21:30, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

What do you want to say? --::Slomox:: >< 22:15, 4 June 2008 (UTC)