This language has been verified as eligible. The language is eligible for a project, which means that the subdomain can be created once there is an active community and a localized interface, as described in the language proposal policy. You can discuss the creation of this language project on this page.
If you think the criteria are met, but the project is still waiting for approval, feel free to notify the committee and ask them to consider its approval.
The community needs to develop an active test project; it must remain active until approval (automated statistics, recent changes). It is generally considered active if the analysis lists at least three active, not-grayed-out editors listed in the sections for the previous few months.
"Wikinews talk" (the discussion namespace of the project namespace)
Default is "no". Preferably, files should be uploaded to Commons.
If you want, you can enable local file uploading, either by any user ("yes") or by administrators only ("admin"). Notes: (1) This setting can be changed afterwards. The setting can only be "yes" or "admin" at approval if the test creates an Exemption Doctrine Policy (EDP) first. (2) Files on Commons can be used on all Wikis. (3) Uploading fair-use images is not allowed on Commons (more info). (4) Localisation to your language may be insufficient on Commons.
Low Saxon is a language without own vital media. There are no daily newspapers, no TV program, no radio station fully dedicated to the language. And no press agencies of course. Where Wikinews in other languages has massive competion by other media, Low Saxon Wikinews could be a real useful news source and bridge a market gap. Especially dedicated to news about the language, which are sparse in other non-Low Saxon media. --::Slomox::>< 18:04, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I support the creation of a Low Saxon Wikinews site, with the proviso that it be a shared German/Dutch effort. There are currently Dutch organisations which bring their news on their websites and German organisations which report on German developments, with very little sharing. A Low Saxon Wikinews site could be the place for both communities to have a peek at what's going on across the spectrum. The dialect of each news item can be as per the development it reports on, or else as per the contributor. Ni'jluuseger 18:41, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sehe der Wikipedia, es ist sehr aktiv, so eine Wikineus wird auch aktiv. Deutschlehrer 14:01, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It is a dialect, I don't believe this is a language to begin with. (Red4tribe 04:29, 21 April 2008 (UTC))[reply]
There is no agreed upon distinction in linguistics between 'dialects' and 'languages'. Any variety of speech is just about as complex and complete as any other. And until fairly recently, most speakers of Low Saxon could only speak (their variety of) Low Saxon - not the national standard language. Would you have it that they were speaking 'a dialect' whereas people whose speech happened to coincide (more or less) with what was to become the standard language were speaking 'a language' all along?
Oppose - Please do not create another project in a dialect/sub-language that doesn't even have a real standardization. This will properly only results in same region based articles. --Jeroen 02:27, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please rephrase that in Dutch. Your English statement lacks standardization (or sense). --::Slomox::>< 21:10, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is not a vote. It's called "Arguments against". --::Slomox::>< 23:33, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Objection This is a news network. It needs to be written in a serious language, and thats what the German (Hochdeutsch) wikinews is for. Wikipedias in creoles and dialects (with the exception of Arabic dialects) are fine with me, but a Wikinews network in Low German? No. Kanzler31 21:57, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
So you have opinions on the worthiness and unworthiness of some languages. Fine. But how is this an argument for anything? --::Slomox::>< 14:02, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose If the language receives no other media, then how will the wiki be able to support itself? From experience on enwikinews, they source their information from different news websites and keep up-to-date with the most recent events around the world; how is the Low Saxon Wikinews with its few native speakers going to attempt the same if all they do is translate news? As of this post, the ndswiki has 16,618 content pages; let's concentrate our resources on building that wiki first. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 06:49, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You don't need to vote "oppose" if your argument is "not enough activity so far". That's a prerequisite for approval anyway. The "oppose" section is for general arguments against the project. --::Slomox::>< 14:02, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is not just low activity; the problem is also the lack of other Low Saxon news sources. You say that "Low Saxon is a language without own vital media. There are no daily newspapers, no TV program, no radio station fully dedicated to the language. And no press agencies of course." Well, how is the Wikinews going to sustain itself if it receives no other news than its own? The English Wikinews, for example, borrows content from Reuters, The New York Times and other up-to-date media; but the Low Saxon Wikinews will receive none of the same for its content, which is all left to unencyclopedic original research. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 02:30, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That's a really weird argument. First, there's nothing that stops us from sourcing news articles from news outlets in other languages.
But the more important thing is: What's the point of Wikinews if you don't create genuine information? You spoke about unencyclopedic original research. Wikipedia is the encyclopedia. Wikipedia needs to be encyclopedic. The other Wikimedia projects do not need to be encyclopedic. Wikinews was created as a wiki-style news outlet. If some Wikinews editions have chosen to be a kind of summary or resume service that aggregates information from other sources, then that's the decision of the projects. But it's not the way Wikinews needs to go under every condition. It's perfectly acceptable to create original news content as long as the news are factual and sourced and NPOV.
I want to remind of one more thing. Wikimedia's mission is to bring information to those people who otherwise may have no access to information. That means, that news outlets in languages lacking commercial media is exactly where Wikimedia can reach people otherwise unreached. English Wikinews, and other big language Wikinews projects, on the other hand operate in a market with masses of professional commercial media. They have low informational impact on their respective societies. In smaller language societies Wikinews can have a much bigger informational impact.
(Disclaimer: Low Saxon Wikinews is still far from the point where it is a sustainable project. I would not support the creation of the project at this moment. But if it gathers a sustainable community and produces a sustainable stream of output, it should be created without any hesitance.) --::Slomox::>< 14:09, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Currently 100.00% of the MediaWiki messages and 65.17% of the messages of the extensions used by the Wikimedia Foundation projects have been localised. Please help us help your language by localising at Betawiki. This is the recent localisation activity for your language. Thanks, GerardM 10:36, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Currently 98.08% of the MediaWiki messages and 47.00% of the messages of the extensions used by the Wikimedia Foundation projects have been localised. Localisation of these messages is a requirement before your request is finally assessed. This is the recent localisation activity for your language. Thanks, GerardM 11:13, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]