User talk:Liuxinyu970226
Add topic
How to edit other people's user page? Thanks! Btw, this list is incomplete. He has hundreds of sock accounts and hundreds of IPs over the years. I'm too lazy to list them all, so I only listed his main socks. Nguyentrongphu (talk) 06:09, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Nguyentrongphu Maybe ask adminships with CheckUser accesses? As mentioned by others, on viwiki these would be DHN and Mxn. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 06:40, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- I don't need checkuser to catch him. I've been dealing with him for many years. I know a duck when I see one. Anyways, my question is how can I edit User:Genggi Tetomu? The system doesn't let me edit that page. Nguyentrongphu (talk) 06:45, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
I got this message from the system when I tried to edit another user page:
Warning: "At Meta it is not usual for a user to edit someone else's user page. A user's main user page would generally only be edited by the user. Please consult with the user on their talk page for edits you are suggesting. If this is your user page, then you may need to login to edit. If this user page is an alternate or a shared account, then you will need to log in to the respective user account to edit. (Noting that many Wikipedias do not allow editing from shared or organisational accounts.) If you have received this message in error, or you have a serious concern about the content of a user page, please let us know.
If the page in question is spam, or similarly problematic, please use the corresponding talk page and mark with either {{edit protected}} or {{delete}}, and your comment. Thank you." Nguyentrongphu (talk) 06:47, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Hmm, that guy might have different issue, as that user said "I have good contributions on Incubator", and Ajraddatz told me to withdraw my attempt to request global ban. Probably needs more focus on their future behaviors.Sorry for my fault looking, I originally guess you're editing POSSUM one. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 06:51, 24 June 2024 (UTC)- You haven't answered my question. Best regards! Nguyentrongphu (talk) 06:55, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- If you're trying to mark Genggi as a sock, I added. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 06:59, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! How come you can edit another user page, but I can't? Nguyentrongphu (talk) 07:00, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Umm, I haven't enough time for focusing that thing. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 07:15, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Nguyentrongphu Now there looks like a problem from an anonymous: User talk:14.244.78.120, I'm not sure what to do, there were edits to my talk page (just here) that you recently reverted. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 16:10, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- The IP is a sock. Tell a steward to block it, then move on. Nguyentrongphu (talk) 21:47, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Nguyentrongphu Per Special:Contributions/14.244.78.120, That's already global blocked by Tegel, plus blocked locally, but talk page still open for themselves. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 21:51, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Best thing to do is to ignore him. He'll lose his talk page editing privilege if he continues to abuse it. Nguyentrongphu (talk) 21:55, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Nguyentrongphu Anyway, recently I got a notice that NDC is globally banned, should the vi:Thành_viên:影武者 be replaced with {{WMF-legal banned user}}? (both that user page and their talk page are protected so it looks like I can only ask so elsewhere) Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:13, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- It's Willy on wheels. It doesn't matter to add tags at this point. Nguyentrongphu (talk) 05:00, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Nguyentrongphu Anyway, recently I got a notice that NDC is globally banned, should the vi:Thành_viên:影武者 be replaced with {{WMF-legal banned user}}? (both that user page and their talk page are protected so it looks like I can only ask so elsewhere) Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:13, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Best thing to do is to ignore him. He'll lose his talk page editing privilege if he continues to abuse it. Nguyentrongphu (talk) 21:55, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Nguyentrongphu Per Special:Contributions/14.244.78.120, That's already global blocked by Tegel, plus blocked locally, but talk page still open for themselves. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 21:51, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- The IP is a sock. Tell a steward to block it, then move on. Nguyentrongphu (talk) 21:47, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! How come you can edit another user page, but I can't? Nguyentrongphu (talk) 07:00, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- If you're trying to mark Genggi as a sock, I added. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 06:59, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- You haven't answered my question. Best regards! Nguyentrongphu (talk) 06:55, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
lock in
[edit]Lock in Limck5856 (talk) 22:55, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Can't look in Limck5856 (talk) 23:00, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Comments on requests for new languages
[edit]Hi,
Can you please stop making comments like this one on requests for new languages? It's not useful. Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 14:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Amire80: That user created that RFL with wrong template (maybe directly copy-pasted source codes from Incubator), I corrected the template, but till now, that Proposal section is still empty, so I just pinged that creator for filling it. What did I say wrong? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:48, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- These requests are for the Language committee. It's more useful to just see that it's empty.
- It's useful to comment if you know something specifically relevant, such as, the language, people who speak the language, or information about the language that cannot easily be found on the usual sources, such as Glottolog and Ethnologue.
- Otherwise, it's just noise. Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 16:56, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Amire80 I rather think it's really not useful, especially the creator Mr. Snatch who, as per the Catanalysis tool, didn't ever contribute that test project, cause this RFL more suspicious than useful for interests. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:44, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- For record, both Wikipedia Pazeh & Wiktionary Pazeh are created by same user without filling Proposal sections, and hence are currently on hold, if you think my comment isn't good, then please also warn Prosfilaes, as what I did doesn't look like different from that user. Otherwise, I would suggest you to defer the eligibility judging of Bura, by same marking it on hold. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:16, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Pazeh proposals are unrelated to this discussion.
- I indeed plan to write the same comment to other users who do similar things. However, even though I didn't count precisely, you seem to be doing it more than anybody else. You have already done it again at Requests for new languages/Wikipedia Rotokas, already after I asked you to stop.
- If you don't know much about the Bura language, or the proposal to create a Wikipedia in it, the best thing to do is not to comment on it. Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 03:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- For Rotokas, afaik that creator created incubator:Wp/roo itself, but no other contents otherwise, maybe that user is too busy in their real lift to start contributions. But for Bura, that tool even didn't list the creator Mr. Snatch as contributor, so that's already enough to at least doubt that whether that user is indeed contributing bwr test project. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- I and other Language committee members can see all these things ourselves. Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 11:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- For Rotokas, afaik that creator created incubator:Wp/roo itself, but no other contents otherwise, maybe that user is too busy in their real lift to start contributions. But for Bura, that tool even didn't list the creator Mr. Snatch as contributor, so that's already enough to at least doubt that whether that user is indeed contributing bwr test project. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)