Talk:Requests for new languages/Wikisource Literary Chinese
Add topicLatest comment: 4 years ago by StevenJ81
LangCom has all the information it needs to make a decision. The discussions added in § Second discussion closed were unnecessary and sometimes not fully appropriate. They have been hatted. The talk page will remain unlocked, but please do not resume discussions on the merits—or discussions about each other. StevenJ81 (talk) 14:16, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
- @StevenJ81: Shouldn't we add Template:Editnotices/Page/Requests for new languages/Wikisource Literary Chinese? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:09, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226: Good idea. I'll try to get to that shortly. StevenJ81 (talk) 15:25, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
- @StevenJ81: do we still need the Temprot template? — billinghurst sDrewth 04:38, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
- Nope. StevenJ81 (talk) 15:20, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
- @StevenJ81: do we still need the Temprot template? — billinghurst sDrewth 04:38, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226: Good idea. I'll try to get to that shortly. StevenJ81 (talk) 15:25, 15 April 2019 (UTC)