User talk:Geógrafo23/Archive

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Archive

Welcome to Meta![edit]

Hello, Geógrafo23/Archive. Welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Wikimedia Forum (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). Happy editing! -- Meta-Wiki Welcome (talk)

Final warning[edit]

Please note that if you make any more improper requests like you did [1] and [2], you will be blocked from editing Meta. This is not the place to get people desysopped on es.wikipedia, just because you are indefinitely blocked there. --Rschen7754 18:21, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Retirada de permisos por inactividad[edit]

En la Wikipedia en español se estableció un criterio definido en la política correspondiente respecto a la inactividad de bibliotecarios. En ella se establece que se requieren como mínimo 50 acciones en los últimos dos años. Aquí puedes comprobar la actividad de los bibliotecarios en los últimos dos años. No solicites más retiradas de permiso basándote en tu propia interpretación, y no en una política, o podrías acabar bloqueado aquí. Savhñ 19:04, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Language[edit]

Dear Geógrafo23, it is obvious that you have problems writing Dutch correctly, or even find the right words to express yourself. Therefore I tried to help you and corrected the messages you wrote on your User Page and in the template that was transcluded there. Otherwise, many readers won't be able to understand what you mean to say there. I'm sorry to see you revert my corrections. They were made with the best intentions, to help you. But if you want to show very clearly that you're not able to contribute in Dutch, then be my guest and leave your messages as they are. It is the best possible sign of your lack of knowledge of our language. Cheers,  Wikiklaas  overleg  10 mrt 2014 00:19 (CET)

Deze vraag werd beantwoord in de afzender overlegpagina van het Nederlandstalige Wikipedia. Geógrafo23 (talk) 02:39, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
In fact, this was not so much a question as well as a comment. It was made in nl:Overleg gebruiker:Geógrafo23 and was first removed by that user, and when put back, left uncommented (so far). This user was setting up a user page on the Dutch Wikipedia and made so many language errors that the text was nearly incomprehensible for readers who don't like to solve puzzles. I tried to help by correcting the language but was reverted almost immediately. The result so far can be viewed here. Having had a look at that, I don't think I have to clarify myself any further. Wikiklaas (talk) 14:25, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Deze vraag werd beantwoord in de afzender overlegpagina van het Nederlandstalige Wikipedia. Geógrafo23 (talk) 14:39, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Munich[edit]

Bonjour,

Merci pour votre message laissé sur ma page de discussion mais il est absolument inenvisageable de renommer "Munich" en "München". Comme je vous l'ai expliqué cet été, certaines villes non francophone ont un nom tout à fait courant en français. C'est le cas de la plupart des grandes villes d'Europe. Londres et non London, Rome et non Roma, Vienne et non Wien… Et donc Munich et non München. La liste est très longue est il n'y a pas à discuter : WP:FR est une encyclopédie écrite en français, on emploie donc les termes en français. Je vous remercie donc une nouvelle fois de bien vouloir comprendre cela et de ne pas recommencer. Autrement, je me verrais contraint de demander un nouveau blocage à votre encontre. Martin' (talk) 16:35, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cette message a été répondu sur la page de discussion de l'expéditeur dans la Wikipédia francophone. Geógrafo23 (talk) 16:39, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]