User talk:MarcoAurelio/Archives/2020-04

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Interwiki proposal

Hello, I just noticed (sorry for being so late) that you archived a discussion of mine marking it as "resolved".
Pardon me, but it appears it is not resolved at all. Everything I wrote there still stand valid to this day and I haven't seen any attempt to improve documentation or to answer my questions.
Maybe nobody cares about what I wrote, still I think I made valid points: there might be no interest in discussing them, but marking as "resolved" something that is just left lingering around doesn't really seems fari to me. Maybe I am wrong. Thanks. --LucaMauri (talk) 07:46, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello. I have reviewed the discussion. I likely marked it as resolved (it's the template used by the bot to archive discussions) because it was inactive for some time (the last comment was on July 18, 2018 and I asked the bot to archive it on October 31, 2019). We usually do this on Meta. It is not that nobody cares about what you wrote. If you wish to revive that discussion, please feel free to raise the topic again on Talk:Interwiki map. Sorry if I cannot answer quickly, it's been difficult times. Best regards, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 18:39, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 April 2020

News, reports and features from the English Wikipedia's weekly journal about Wikipedia and Wikimedia