Wikimedia Grantee Perception Survey

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

I am interested in knowing how WMF grantees feel about the Wikimedia Grants Process and how their experience in getting a grant was. I have therefore drafted the following questions that I will later use to prepare a survey. Feel free to redact or add any questions that you think should also be asked. Thanks, Abbasjnr (talk) 08:15, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Sample Questions[edit]

Overall Satisfaction[edit]

Can you rate:

  • your interactions with Foundation Staff? (fairness, responsiveness, approachability.)
  • Clarity of communication of WMF's goals and strategy. Was there clear and consistent articulation of objectives?
  • Transparency of the process.
  • your satisfaction relative to last year?

Grantee Interactions[edit]

  • Are you comfortable with the interactions on the talk page?
  • How responsive was the Foundation staff?
  • Are you comfortable approaching the Foundation if any problem arises?
  • Frequency of grantee contact with Program Officer during grant (weekly, monthly, once every few months)
  • Initiation of interactions (most frequently initiated by grantee; initiated with equal frequenct by grantee and program officer; most frequently initiated by program officer)

Primary Contact Transition[edit]

  • Has your primary contact at the Foundation changed in the past six months?

Non-Monetary Assistance[edit]

  • Does the Foundation offer Management Assistance? (general management advice, strategic planning advice, financial planning/accounting, development of performance measures)
  • Does the Foundation offer Field-related Assistance? (encourage collaboration, introduction to leaders in field, provide best practices)
  • Does the Foundation offer Other Assistance? (Board development, Communication/publicity assistance, Use of Foundation facilities, Staff/management training)

Assistance securing funding from other sources[edit]

  • Proportion of grantees receiving assistance securing funding from other sources.
  • Rate the impact of the funder's assistance securing funding from other sources.

Grant Process and Administration[edit]

  • How did you find the funding application? (cumbersome, easy, difficult to complete)
  • Level of involvement of staff in development of grant proposal.
  • Level of pressure to modify grantees' priorities to create a request that was likely to receive funding.
  • Time elapsed between submission and clear commitment of funding.
  • How did you find the reporting requirements?
  • Ease of wiring funds (Forex rates, country legal requirements)
  • How does the amount of information requested in the Foundation's application and reporting requirements compare to the amount requested by your other funders?

Grantee Suggestions for the Funder[edit]

Provide suggestions for how the funder could improve.

  • Clarity of communications
  • Quality/quantity of interactions
  • Non-Monetary assistance
  • Transparency
  • Evaluation Process
  • Other