Meta:Requests for adminship: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:10, 8 January 2006

Participate:

If you would like to become an admin of Meta, please follow the procedure below. This is a serious responsibility. For example meta-admins can edit the fundraising page.

For Requests for adminship on other wikis see Requests for permissions.

Full policy is available on Administrator on Meta#Policy for requesting adminship.

You may request to be administrator if:

you are or have been a participant for at least 2 months on at least one wikimedia project (at least 100 contributions)
you have a user page on meta, with link(s) to the local project user page, and valid contact address (registered and valid wikipedia email address in preferences, or an email address indicated on your user page)
you are (or perhaps having been some time ago) an active contributor on meta (more than 100 contributions)
you are a sysop on a local wikipedia or related project

The request will stay here at least 1 week. Sysophood will be granted by a majority of at least 75%.

Exceptions

If you need temporary sysop access to edit protected pages (related in particular to languages files), you may request temporary sysophood on meta. In this case, the adminship shall be granted with no requirements and approval, but the user will promise to limit their activity to the necessity of the local project. Sysop access will be valid for one month.

Procedure

Make an edit to your talk page on the wiki where you are an administrator about the request specifying the nickname you are using here (for example):
I am requesting adminship on Meta for the account [[:m:User:<Account>]]. ~~~~
Request adminship on this page
Include here the link to that version in history of your talk page to confirm your identity

Recently created sysops

Archives of sysops since 2004: archive 1 | archive 2

Current requests

For adminship on other wikis, visit Requests for permission. Thank you!

User:Essjay

Self-nomination.

I have been an EN editor since February 8, 2005 with over 7400 edits.
I have a userpage on Meta with a link to my EN page and a valid email set.
I am an active Meta editor.
I am an active admin on EN.

I've slowed down my EN work somewhat, and have become more involved on Meta as a result. I plan to help with cleaning up some of the mess that has accumulated here, as well as watching out for WP articles that are accidentally posted here and require a transwiki and delete (which I am already doing via the {{delete}} tag). I tend to spend a lot of time in the #wikimedia IRC channel, and have noticed frequent requests for Meta admins that are often unsuccessful because there aren't always Meta admins available there. In short, I'd like adminship to be able to more quickly clean up the unneeded postings and in general be available for whatever admin tasks are needed. I've been a very prolific admin on EN, and would be proportionally prolific here. I have confirmed my identity (same username across all projects) here. -- Essjay · Talk 02:57, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Korg + ⁺ 03:22, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, absolutely. Raul654 03:47, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. en's loss is meta's gain. :) Kelly Martin 06:09, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support, echo Kelly's comment's the move of Essjay is en's loss - Although I had no account here until now, I would like to vouch for Essjay's admin skills based on his work in en. --Wiki alf 14:05, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Duh with a capital D. Linuxbeak 14:32, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Datrio 14:41, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jon Harald Søby 17:11, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Of course. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 19:15, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support　:) --Suisui 19:26, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Taichi - (あ！) 20:41, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Chick Bowen 03:59, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral : I have no idea what your contributions as a sysop on en is (but I am certain others will report on this). I can only speak for meta. On meta, you have roughly 150 contributions, most of them being to your user page or subpages, steward or admin voting pages and irc quotes. So, I am not really convinced you know about meta way (which has rules different from en). I would rather recommand you stick on meta for a little while longer and ask again soon. Nothing personal otherwise. Note : it might be that you indeed contribute by tagging pages for deletions (in this case, this is not visible in your contributions), so I vote neutral rather than oppose. Anthere 22:40, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Anthere: You're exactly right; I do do speedy tagging, and they've all been speedy deleted! I take that as a sign that I've at least got the speedy deletion policy down! ;-) -- Essjay · Talk 19:02, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
cool :-) I am not sure exactly what is our speedy deletion policy... errr, when I see crap, I delete it... is that it ? :-) Anthere
Support Brian New Zealand 04:19, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Jaxl 19:03, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support M/ 19:07, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good editor and janitor on en:; no problems with edits on meta. Xaosflux 19:43, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Flcelloguy (A note?) 00:29, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support, the third person I nominated for en sysop who ran at meta ;-) Redwolf24 06:47, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for temporary sysophood

Sysop confirmation, January 2006

See Meta:Administrators/confirm

@@ Line 59: / Line 59: @@
 #'''Neutral''' : I have no idea what your contributions as a sysop on en is (but I am certain others will report on this). I can only speak for meta. On meta, you have roughly 150 contributions, most of them being to your user page or subpages, steward or admin voting pages and irc quotes. So, I am not really convinced you know about meta way (which has rules different from en). I would rather recommand you stick on meta for a little while longer and ask again soon. Nothing personal otherwise. Note : it might be that you indeed contribute by tagging pages for deletions (in this case, this is not visible in your contributions), so I vote neutral rather than oppose. [[User:Anthere|Anthere]] 22:40, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 #:Anthere: You're exactly right; I do do speedy tagging, and they've all been speedy deleted! I take that as a sign that I've at least got the speedy deletion policy down! ;-) -- [[User:Essjay|Essjay]] ·  [[User_talk:Essjay| Talk]] 19:02, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
+#::cool :-) I am not sure exactly what is our speedy deletion policy... errr, when I see crap, I delete it... is that it ? :-) [[User:Anthere|Anthere]]
 #'''Support''' [[User:Brian New Zealand|Brian New Zealand]] 04:19, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 #'''Support'''. [[User:Jaxl|Jaxl]] 19:03, 7 January 2006 (UTC)