Talk:Spam blacklist

←Requests and proposals

Spam blacklist

Archives (current)→

The associated page is used by the Mediawiki SpamBlacklist extension, and lists strings of text that may not be used in URLs in any page in Wikimedia Foundation projects (as well as many external wikis). Any meta administrator can edit the spam blacklist. Please post comments to the appropriate section below: Proposed additions, Proposed removals, Troubleshooting and problems, or Other discussions; read the messageboxes at the top of each section for an explanation. Also, please check back some time after submitting, there could be questions regarding your request. Per-project whitelists are discussed at MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist.

Completed requests are archived, additions and removal are logged.

Spam blacklist is protected as a sensitive page, although it is not located in the MediaWiki namespace for technical reasons. Users may use this talk page to discuss changes.

snippet for logging: {{/request|488036#section_name}} wanted

Proposed additions

This section is for proposing that a website be blacklisted; add new entries at the bottom of the section, using the basic URL so that there is no link (google.ca, not http://www.google.ca). Provide links demonstrating widespread spamming by multiple users. Completed requests will be marked as done or denied and archived.

forza-ca.com

Bonjour, il y a un problème avec ce lien externes sur la Wikipedia francophone à cette page : Club Africain. Des membres du forum de ce site ne cessent de spammer l'article depuis plusieurs jours. Serait-il envisageable de blaclister le lien ? Cordialement; Kassus 12:51, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

freefind.com

Due to the way this search engine works, it seems you can restrict it to your site and also get it to display your ads/links in a frame around the returned search results, without either being obvious in the URL linked to. Only a couple of users doing this thus far, see here, but will probably get worse. It'd also be trivial to use this to get around the blacklist, like the URL shorteners. 66.196.41.211 20:18, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

bt-blog.net.ru

Added repeatedly to mulitple pharmaceutical-related articles on English Wikipedia by a different IP each time. Latest examples: [1] [2]. Edgar181 13:05, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Done. -- mzlla 20:56, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Linkfarm additions

I got a whole mess of additions which I would like to add - over 280 links. I've been tracking an anonymous user who keeps adding links to Wikipedia that link to a set of pornstar photo sites that are presumably under his control. Given the length of the list I think it might be impratical to list then here, but the full list of items can be seen here on a sublink of my user page: en:User:Tabercil\Porn Linkspam. Can I get the links he's been adding put on the blacklist? 69.157.81.151 01:12, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Not done; the subpage you linked to provides a list of IP addresses and a list of affected articles, but no list of spam URLs. —[admin] Pathoschild 18:44, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Sorry. Didn't realize the format I used on the article made it difficult for you to find the spam links in question. I've reformatted the page to show first the link which was spammed, then just below it the article in question and how many times it was changed. Hopefully, this works for you better. Tabercil 00:09, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Sure looks like a spam campaign to me. Just zis Guy, you know? 17:24, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

*4host.info

Massive spam 1 2 3 from different IPs on it.wikipedia, has anybody observed the same mess on other wikies?

--M/ 01:38, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Yes, on the english wikipedia. 154.5.232.223 23:38, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

seniordesires.com

Most of these 67.160.237.185 contribs and all of Kumword contribs and Humword contribs revolve around adding this site to various pages. JonHarder 17:40, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

voip-phone-service-solutions.com

The following discussion is closed: not done, no complains

Added twice to the en:Telecommunication article from multiple IP addresses. [3] [4] Seems unlikely to ever be used in a valid article. Please consider adding. 139.168.224.14 04:56, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Not done, this site does not need to be blacklisted because the spamming wideness isn't enough. en.wikipedia may ban the IP responsible of spamming or protect the specified page. -- mzlla 12:10, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

perso.orange.fr/pgreenfinch

Personal website of a "spamming and rude" ccontributor. This link was ever removed by administrator's decision, because it violate several WP rules: no autopromotion, avoid personnal webpages, limitation of external links to believable sources, ... Pgreenfinch uses edition war to continue promoting its own website, which also promote author's personal "original theories" without any beginning of academical caution.

(Problem is relevant for french version, english and spanish version. here are some additional informational links, for french firemen and admins') Règles Wikipédia régulièrement violées par Pgreenfinch:

• Courtoisie (

Wikipédia:Règles de savoir-vivre). Il est grossier, insultant, condescendant, et ne supporte pas le NPOV sur les opinions. Et après, il retourne cette accusation contre celles et ceux qui finissent, excédés, par répondre à ses insultes sur le même ton.

• Usage des liens externes

Aide:Liens externes: il fait de l'autopromo. Quand bien son site d'amateur serait pertinent (ce qui n'est pas le cas), ce n'est pas conforme aux principes déontologiques WP qu'il s'autopromotionne ainsi, sans peer-review (censurées à chaque fois par ce monsieur)

Wikip%C3%A9dia:Pas_de_menace_de_poursuites_judiciaires: il menace régulièrement de poursuites judiciaires, par exemple lorsque l'on rappelle que l'entreprise qu'il avait crée a mis la clé sous la porte (info trouvé avec Google en cherchant qui était ce monsieur: source: infogreffe - entreprise monescience) ...

• liste non exhaustive, hélas ...

Quand Pgreenfinch décide de faire son autopromo pour son site ou ses élucubrations personnelles, il emploie les pires méthodes: spam, dénigrement, guerre d'édition, mensonges, et injures. Des pages et des ages de WP montent comment cet auteur problématique se conduit, le plus souvent:

• http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipédia:Appel_à_commentaires/Utilisateur/Pgreenfinch (vandalismes 2006)
• http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion_Utilisateur:Pgreenfinch/2004-2005 (vandalismes 2004-2005)
• http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion_Wikip%C3%A9dia:Administrateur/Plaintes/Papillus (autre témoignage)
• http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion_Wikip%C3%A9dia:Pages_%C3%A0_supprimer/Liste_d%27articles_en_rapport_avec_le_mouvement_altermondialiste "fausse manoeuvre" visant à supprimer des références à "l'altermondialisme" (ce n'est pas sa "tasse de thé" ;-)
• http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion_Wikip%C3%A9dia:Comit%C3%A9_d%27arbitrage/Arbitrage/Pgreenfinch-HDDTZUZDSQ#24h_de_colle
• http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion_Wikip%C3%A9dia:Comit%C3%A9_d%27arbitrage/Arbitrage/HDDTZUDSQ-Pgreenfinch
• http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discuter:Lib%C3%A9ralisme#archives et http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discuter:Lib%C3%A9ralisme
• http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discuter:Jos%C3%A9_Bov%C3%A9 pgreenfinch déteste José BOVE (ce qui est son droit) Il a donc sur cette page pratiqué l'une de ses habituelle guerre d'édition pour ne garder que les passages négatifs, s'en prenant vivement au passage à un administrateur: Papillus

Et cette liste est très loin d'être exhaustive !!!

astore.amazon.com/chuvashiaportal etc

This is an amazon affiliate site, spammed here along with five other sites: [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39]

That's:

• astore.amazon.com/chuvashiaportal
• odele.ru
• chr.ru
• atst.ru
• iapb.ru
• kamaztorg.ru

-- zzuuzz ^(talk) 09:47, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Not done. We can't deny only astore.amazon.com/chuvashiaportal, we should ban the whole astore.amazon.com, and I think it is not sensible. I would recommend that English Wikipedia bans the whole subnetwork 217.106.166.* - it might be the easiest solution. These other .ru-domains would be blacklisted, but I think that it is not needed if you ban the subnetwork in en.wikipedia. -- mzlla 13:09, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

gjph0.com e gpesdn.com

Several empty pages created on it.wiki, containing spamadv of porn sites. --M/ 15:00, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

wiganathleticyears.com

The following discussion is closed: done

The football years spammer is back.[40][41] Please refer to "*years" under Talk:Spam_blacklist/Archives/2006/10. —LX (talk, contribs) 11:23, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Done. *years.com's blacklisting entry changed to (?:cup|league|football|wayne|premiership|steven|united|athletic).*years\.com -- mzlla 11:54, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

librie.boom.ru

The following discussion is closed: done

This is a pirate warez site located in Russia. It is an archive of copyright books for use on the Sony Libre e-book reader. It has been added and removed from Sony Librie EBR-1000EP many times now (see article history). It should be blocked. If not, could you please let us know at w:Talk:Sony Librie EBR-1000EP. Thanks! signed w:User:Stbalbach (72.83.243.49 22:35, 10 November 2006 (UTC))

Should I do something different? Someone just re-added it again. [42] -- w:User:Stbalbach 72.83.123.12 14:17, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Someone just added it again. [43]. Any help appreciated! -- 72.83.123.12 15:07, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Added again [44]. -- 72.83.123.12 03:42, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

..and again [45] -- 72.83.123.12 03:43, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

one again.. [46]. -- 72.83.123.12 20:38, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Done. -- mzlla 20:59, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, mzlla! Is there any way to scan across all of MediWiki to make sure it doesn't exist elsewhere (since it's a Russian site and the user has been unrelenting in adding it to the English WIkipedia I suspect it is probably elsewhere). Or are blocked sites auto-removed? Also, is there any way to prevent a user from adding the URL as plain text (without the "http://")? That seems to be the anons new strategy. -- 72.83.123.12 23:54, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

kunstmarkt.com

www.kunstmarkt.com is a trader's website for art and shouldn't be allowed in articles. Currently there are 59 Weblinks to this Website in the german Wikipedia. Before I remove them, please add www.kunstmarkt.com to the blacklist, so I don't have to do it over and over again. Thanx --Hedwig in Washington 23:38, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Done, obvious commercial site. BTW, what do you think about kunstportal-bw.de? MaxSem 08:26, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

I'll check that in a minute, first I have to enter another 8-) --Hedwig in Washington 08:41, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

artnet.de

it's a auction-search-site, no additional info. --Hedwig in Washington 08:41, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Not done. We aren't usually blacklisting some kind of sites, you should give us some evidence of how this domain has been spammed in some wiki. -- mzlla 16:20, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

I understand and appreciate your concern, so

here it goes: [47] 129 entries on de:wikipedia.

example: www.artnet.de/artist/579306/constantino-nivola.html deep-link, but still brings the login/sign up stuff on top of very poor information

is that ok so far? take care --Hedwig in Washington 22:46, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Done per this, talk in my talk page and per an email query. There is consensus in German Wikipedia to block this site. -- mzlla 14:46, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, if you want to provide visual information (e.g. John de Andrea), it would be silly to block artnet. In Germany, we have very strict copyright rules, so museums will not provide visual information because of high costs. artnet jumps in just as handy as Google does. Otherwise, you would expect users to be clever enough to find out themselves, like I did. (BTW, I circumvented your blockage by using artnet.com) --WernerPopken 14:07, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

WernerPopken, your opinion is exactly my opinion (I too come from Germany). Artnet sometimes is very useful, as you explained it. No login/sign up stuff is shown if links directly refer to a picture. Let's take the example given by Hedwig in Washington. Look: [48]. If important, the further given informations can be used as content of the link text. Example: Two people in bed, Bronze. You can do the same way using other similar auction-search-sites. What do you think, Hedwig in Washington, can we agree to use artnet in this way? -- Archidux 16:09, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

kunstportal-bw.de

no additional info, IMHO spam --Hedwig in Washington 08:46, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Not done. We are absolutely not blacklisting sites by opinion, you should give some evidences about spamming! -- mzlla 16:22, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

that's already down to only 8 entries, think we can handle it manually! Like I said above: I really appreciate your concern. thanks for your time! best regards --Hedwig in Washington 22:52, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

anzwers\.org

The following discussion is closed: done

see katrinahelp.info/wiki/index.php?title=Contacts-Leads&oldid=25143 --jwalling 23:00, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Done Naconkantari 23:04, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

thetruthaboutquixtar.com

See here for discussion Talk:Quixtar#Controversy. Insider201283 is continually adding a link to his personal web site to Quixtar related sites. This has been an ongoing problem for months. I think some time on the black list for this domain would save many people a lot of time. Thanks for considering this link. 70.226.161.233 08:24, 13 November 2006 (UTC) User_talk:David D.

Not done, because I can't see any massive spamming which may need blacklisting. If there is some please give more exact details like link to differences etc. -- mzlla 13:44, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

theshadowsun.com

The following discussion is closed: done

As per the ongoing sockpuppetry spam problem that led to the addition of theshadowsun.net to the blacklist, the spammer has now switched to using theshadowsun.com: [49]. Thanks. Dmcdevit 00:42, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Done this too. -- mzlla 19:39, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

amanteaonline.it, amantearadio.it, amanteacalcio.it, amanteaninelmondo.info

The following discussion is closed: done

These sites have been spammed on it.wiki for about 3 months by anonymous and registered users (obviously created just to insert these links). You can see the history of it:Amantea. --.anaconda 19:15, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Done. -- mzlla 19:25, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

zzw2z.info, myjhy.info, ngvjj.info, eqqwsa.info, ccxxsg.info, weewss.info

The following discussion is closed: done

See [50], [51], etc. Also several talk pages that were recently created by this spammer and were deleted, so can't be linked to. Dmcdevit 10:06, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Adding more. All appear to be the same spambot on open proxies. Examples: [52], [53], etc. Dmcdevit 10:10, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Done. -- mzlla 12:24, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

uskupi.com, prosaleshop.org, bestbidbuy.org...

The following discussion is closed: done

• Full list: uskupi.com, prosaleshop.org, bestbidbuy.org, klzuydg.com, abradco.com, lyvyl.info, adirect.org, xddme.com, moank.info, anagl.info, ankyl.info, dicmh.com, gergv.info, clapn.info, tigri.info, teeti.info, sabd.info, scyb.info, iifooi.info, qsskk.info, csddj.info, myjhy.info, ngvjj.info, ddl8i.info, afdss.info, oberl.info, ykkkh.info, tdfsf.info, zfdfs.info
• Example on pl.wikipedia: history and log

stv ✉ 14:43, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Some of these are already blacklisted. I am not going blacklist the others, if the spamming ended from pl.wikipedia when the spammed page was protected. Anyway please write here again if the spamming continues. -- mzlla 15:43, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Right... That's not the only page. See also: [54], [55] and [56]. I don't want to undelete all those pages (the last one has 145 deleted revisions). Protecting doesn't help, the spamer moves to other variants of "Forum dyskusyjne". stv ✉ 16:00, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Done. I checked the sites and I can't hardly imagine any valid use of them. These seems to be spamming sites. -- mzlla 17:31, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

special-ringtones.net

The following discussion is closed: done

Spambot on open proxies, see [57], [58], [59], etc. Dmcdevit 19:49, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Done. -- mzlla 20:46, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

oduuy.info, aiipa.info

The following discussion is closed: done

Same spammer as above, #zzw2z.info, myjhy.info, ngvjj.info, eqqwsa.info, ccxxsg.info, weewss.info. e.g. [60]. Dmcdevit 19:59, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Done. -- mzlla 20:48, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

xxell.com

The following discussion is closed: done

IP 67.99.92.2 has been spamming several Wikipedia pages with petroleum-s.com/petition. This URL ponts to xxell.com This is the same website that a blacklisted URL, complexxon.org, points to. Others, including gasroot.com, llp3.com, europaque.eu, oil-gas.eu, and malh.eu also go there.

A web link search reveals none of these are currently displayed. PrometheusX303 20:45, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Done. -- mzlla 20:50, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Universe Daily updates for November

Hi guys, could you please remove the following links from:

## 2006-10 ([[Spam blacklist/Log]])
lochnessmonster\.name
jerrypournelle\.org
monsternews\.org
minotaur\.name
bindiirwin\.info
richardfinnila\.coma
janogibson\.com

## 2006-11 ([[Spam blacklist/Log]])
chloemurdoch\.com
jamespacker\.(net|org)
jodhipacker\.com
lachlanmurdoch\.(net|org)
wendimurdoch\.com

and replace the Universe Daily section with the following update:

alien(life|news)\.info
amateurspaceflight\.com
artofwar\.name
atomicrockets\.com
badastronomer\.com
badastronomy\.info
bindiirwin\.info
carlsagan\.info
chloemurdoch\.com
dalek\.name
dinosaurs\.name
everythingscience\.org
everythingspace\.com
fuckamerica\.info
fuckisrael\.org
james(-|)packer\.(info|net|org)
jamie-packer\.(com|net|org)
jamiepacker\.(com|net)
janogibson\.com
jeeperscreepers3\.net
jerrypournelle\.(net|org)
jodhi(meares|packer)\.com
jodiemeares\.com
lachlanmurdoch\.(net|org)
lochnessmonster\.name
manpoweredflight\.com
minotaur\.name
monster(hunter|news)\.org
nuclear(australia|starships)\.com
nuclearspace\.org
projectorion\.(info|net|org)
projectorion\.proboards28\.com
richardfinnila\.com
rupertmurdoch\.ws
robertzubrin\.com
science(geek|weekly)\.info
sciencenews\.(name|ws)
sciforums\.info
space4peace\.com
spacedaily\.info
spaceforums\.(info|org)
stephenhawkingsuniverse\.com
terrorismnews\.info
universedaily\.(com|info|org)
universetoday\.(info|net)
wendideng\.(net|org)
wendimurdoch\.com
wikipedia(c|l|m)\.(info|net)
wikipedian\.info
yales\.info
yalesimkin\.com
yowiehunter\.com

Having all his domains consolidated in one section on the blacklist will make it easier for us to track him. I've tidied up the regular expressions and removed the domains belonging to the Australian politicians he's handed back. Most recent additions include new domains link-spammed by en:Special:Contributions/202.126.104.83 en:Special:Contributions/203.217.13.148 targeting en:James Packer, en:Jodhi Packer and en:Man Powered Flight. Current domains all redirect to http://www.myspace.com/universedaily. Thanks. --  Netsnipe  ►  06:49, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Hi guys, is there any particular reason why no one's gotten around to this yet? --  Netsnipe  ►  10:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Wayne has posted jodhimeares.com again [61]. --  Netsnipe  ►  10:11, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Evidence: en:Special:Contributions/203.10.59.63 and en:Special:Contributions/210.18.215.162 --  Netsnipe  ►  02:37, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

blackcomb.co.uk

The following discussion is closed: done

Commercial site; continued spamming ith sockpuppets: [62], [63], [64], [65]. Dmcdevit 05:30, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Done. -- mzlla 13:53, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

centraldorap.com

The following discussion is closed: done

Generic comercial website about rap being added in articles about rap artists using diferent IPs, all of them at pt.wiki. After at least three IP blocks and one article block for IP edits, the problem is still present. Some examples:

[66], [67], [68], [69], [70], [71], [72], [73], [74], [75], [76], [77], [78], [79], [80], [81], [82], [83], [84], [85], [86], [87], [88], [89], [90], [91], ... there are more of them...

Leonardo.stabile 21:28, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Done. You provided at least enough evidence. :) -- mzlla 21:30, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

ezpicking.com

ezpicking.com is repeatedly spamming their website in all lockpick/lock related articles on Wikipedia. I have requested numerous times to stop as have several other admins. We have to date blocked 5 sockpuppet accounts for spamming this site. Alkivar (sysop on En Wiki). 22:49, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Please give some links to diffs where this site has been spammed. I checked quickly your contributions for reverts, and found nothing. I saw also no spamming in accounts which you have recently banned. -- mzlla 23:29, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

suite101.com

Links to this site have been spammed to at least 371 articles by multiple IPs. The site is essentially a blog site dressed in a suit - it consists of "freelance writers" submitting their own articles, none of which require sources or peer review of any kind (ie Original Research). They pay their editors based on page views, and encourage them to use SEO techniques to spam their articles across the web. See the relevant discussion on en at WikiProject Spam: [92]. AbsolutDan 15:46, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Done. -- mzlla 15:49, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Hi - my name is Peter Berger, I am representing Suite101. I would like to assure you we are not a spam site, but have contracted writers who we screen for content knowledge and writing skills. Our site is basically very similar to about.com (which is receiving a lot of references from Wikipedia); our freelance writers are experts in their field and we do not influence them how and on what they should write. As we correct any errors on our site whenever we find them, Suite101 is a safe site to refer users to. We have always been very proud that a lot of Wikipedia users found our articles worthwhile reference, so I think it is unfair to our readers and writers to simply blacklist any links to articles simply based on the fact they are hosted on our site. It would be great if you could remove suite101.com from the blacklist and those references be restored. Thanks for your help! Berger peter 23:20, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

I have nothing against removing from blacklist, but I think we should wait if there is formed consensus in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam#Suite101_dot_com -- mzlla 23:42, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

mzlla, thanks for your help. I am not sure if the debate is really about blacklists or rather about removing individual links as spam. Suite101 is an editorial site, hosts 90,000 original articles and has been live since 1996; many of our articles were original sources of reference for Wikipedia articles. Suite101 has not abused Wikipedia, neither has the vast majority of our writers. We have taken steps to ensure that all writers are aware of and conform with Wikipedia's submission rules. Could you advise us if there are any additional things we need to do to be removed from the blacklist? I would really like to avoid that readers insert links to articles on our site in good faith and are then being told they are "spamming" Wikipedia. Berger_peter 17:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Will not be removed per [93]. -- mzlla 19:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

free-ringtones.aqhhhh.info and loan.ododf.info

Spammed new pages at the Sonikmatter Wiki.

See the following revision history's (note that these pages will be deleted in their entirity in about a week. They were previously empty, so deleting will remove the spam from the revision logs as well)

• Page 1
• Page 2
• Page 3
• Page 4
• Page 5
• Page 6

The Puppeteer 06:43, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Not done, that project seems not to be part of Wikimedia, so this is wrong place to discuss about spamming there. -- mzlla 06:54, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Actually, simple search shows that this domain actively spams on MediaWiki sites, so it's worth blacklisting. Don't forget, this blacklist is shared among several thousands MediaWiki sites, though it's main purpose is protecting Wikimedia sites. MaxSem 19:23, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Done then. Actually I don't think that we would need the content of these sites. -- mzlla 22:22, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

The sonikmatter wiki isn't part of Wikimedia, but we do use MediaWiki and up until we found this spam blacklist we had dreadful problems with Spam. We are very dilligent with monitoring content and changes to our wiki, and we do maintain a local blacklist in addition to the list here, so that we can halt any spam immediately.

We submit links to this list because any spammers hitting our wiki, are likely hitting other wiki's as well. We feel that the least we can do is to be active in submitting links that are causing us problems, because it will likely be helping out others. We try to submit these links in a format that makes things as easy as possible for you guys, with links to pages showing the spam. If there is anything further that we can do to make this easier, or if you would prefer that we didn't submit links to this page, please let me know here.

We appreciate the blacklist, and what you guys do here, to maintain it. We do our best to help, but we don't want to cause any problems.

The Puppeteer 02:30, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, no problems, we can add the spam links here. The only situation which may cause problems is situation when the site has some valid and useful use here in Wikimedia. -- mzlla 07:49, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Please could you add ...

The following discussion is closed: done

mortgage-refinance.rubylq2.com and related derivatives. Thanks. Proto 14:49, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Why? You should give some reasons why that specified site should be added. -- mzlla 15:04, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

It's being used in forum spam on en.wikipedia (you know, the automated messages that keep popping up on pages with artificial endings such as foo/index/w.php) Proto 13:49, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Would you please give some evidence, links to diffs etc.? I haven't seen any spamming from this site yet. -- mzlla 14:42, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

en:User talk:Skysmith/w/index.php is one location. The text read " Interesting topic... I have been researching this for a while, You seem to be very knowledgable about this I added your page to my bookmarks and hope to see more interesting advice in the future...Keep up the steady flow of good information it's lacking on most websites! [url=http://mortgage-refinance.rubylq2.com] Mortgage Refinance?[/url] ". Of course, it's now been deleted and protected. I don't know if you have admin access or not on en.wikipedia to double triple check I'm not making up such a crazy request for the fun and the heck of it. Proto 13:07, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Done now. -- mzlla 00:56, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

en:Melanotan

The following discussion is closed: done

Anon IP editors have been repeatedly adding the following sites selling the stuff:

• www.melanocorp.com
• www.melanoplanet.com
• www.melanotan.com.au

It'd cut down on reverts if all of these sites could be spam blocked. Thanks. Netscott 03:06, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Done. -- mzlla 09:32, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Mzlla, thanks for the prompt assistance. Netscott 19:22, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

blackburnroversyears.com

The football years spammer continues.[94] Please refer to "*years" under Talk:Spam_blacklist/Archives/2006/10 and the recent entry for wiganathleticyears.com. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:15, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Not done, because that site is validly linked from several Wikipedias. Check for example: [95] [96] [97] [98]. I think that linking to fansite of some FC should be possible. -- mzlla 21:23, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

I humbly contest the validity of the links in the articles you present. The links in the articles you list were all added within the course of one hour[99] [100] [101] [102] [103] [104] by 86.138.215.110. The site is not a fansite, but part of a farm of commercial sites produced by World Cup Years LTD to sell merchandise. Other associated sites have been spammed in the same fashion and subsequently blocked. I fail to see how this one is any different. —LX (talk, contribs) 13:45, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Done with these arguments. It seems that I made a mistake when checking these, thank you for noticing. -- mzlla 13:59, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks! You're doing a good job here. Could you please add www.fulhamfcyears.com for the same reason. (See sv:Special:Contributions/86.143.169.89.) It's looking like it might make sense to just block .*fcyears.com. —LX (talk, contribs) 05:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

rapidforum.com

The following discussion is closed: done

Hello, in de.wikipedia are links to forum not allowed. a few persons allways add links like this: http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Telenovela&diff=24149915&oldid=24149871. Is it possible to block the hole Domain, or (if not) this forum. --80.129.52.134 17:46, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Done (for the specified forum). I did not blocked the whole domain because there might be need to link to some forum in another wiki. -- mzlla 21:15, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

www.holocaustresearchproject.org

Spammed by two successive role accounts [105], [106], plus [107] and maybe others. A ludicrously inaccurate site (see http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2006/11/heart-as-educational-resource.html), of no conceivable encyclopaedic value. Time has been wasted cleaning up this junk. Just zis Guy, you know? 23:02, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

And again, [108], e.g. [109] - same MO, link added at the top of the list. Just zis Guy, you know? 15:58, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Done. -- mzlla 16:42, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

hs4free.info and easths.info

Link farm replacement of category pages in an effort to boost google rankings: [110] [111]. Has also spammed other places on net including Macromedia Flash forums: [112].WAvegetarian14:07, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

They've branched out to multiple languages across the web. Check out a Google search for hs4free. They are huge scale link spammers.WAvegetarian 14:15, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Done. -- mzlla 16:45, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

ghosttracker.50webs.com

This is a link added by an anonymous and persistent spammer using numerous AOL IPs, to a number of articles related to the paranormal, metaphysics and supernatural on the english Wikipedia. As for example Ghost, Poltergeist and Clairvoyance. Examples follows below:

• 172.143.166.70 - Ghost, edit 1
• 172.201.12.187 - Ghost, edit 2
• 172.142.57.188 - Ghost, edit 3
• 172.188.162.120 - Ghost, edit 4
• 81.145.240.155 - Ghost, edit 5

Since this anonymous spammer have been warned on the talk pages associated with this IP, as well as on the article talk pages, but still persists with his behaviour, I feel that a blacklisting of this link would be appropriate. /Magore 20:10, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Done. -- mzlla 00:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

judicial-inc.biz

This site is definitely not a reliable source for any information, since everything is so horribly biased it's sickening. It's also being spammed on Wikipedia (see [113] for example). They have also created an -inc.biz/wikipedia.htm attack page on Wikipedia which is very offensive. It should definitely be blacklisted. --Mets501 (editing as 71.113.129.200) 00:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Done. -- mzlla 00:51, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

htmlstaff.org

Generic website about WWW technologies (with bad content) being added in the HTML and PHP articles by different IPs (and one registered user which was only editing that link), all of them at pt.wiki. After articles block for IP edits the problem is still present. Some examples:

[114] [115] [116] [117] [118] [119] [120] [121] [122] [123] [124] [125] [126] [127]

Leonardo.stabile 12:59, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

I do not understand Portuguese, and I'd like to see someone else commenting here too. But as far as I understand this case, some single user have registered to htmlstaff.org and gets something by bringing visitors there. In this case I think better solution would be contacting to htmlstaff.org administrators. I do not blacklist this site yet, because I can see some valid use for it. -- mzlla 20:52, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

*.1esbian.org

Several attempts to blank "BBS" (Spanish edition) and fill it with pornographic spam. [128] [129]. --Roberpl 12:01, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Done. -- mzlla 18:57, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

jeuverbal.com

Multiple IP are adding this links to french wikipédia (like here, here or here). Is that possible to blacklist it? Thanks. --84.101.128.234 03:29, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Done. -- mzlla 21:33, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

rutaverdebolivia.com

Links are added to various articles on nl.wikipedia by different anonymous users: here, here, here, etc. - 82.95.15.174 13:45, 4 December 2006 (UTC) (nl:Gebruiker:Erik Baas)

Done. -- mzlla 13:59, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

rosencomet.com

I'm not certain whether the site above is appropriate for blacklisting since it is currently under mediation Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-11-03 Starwood Festival and AfC therefore it's an ongoing thing. However I think it's worth bringing to your attention and consideration. Examples of what I consider external linkspam are: Wikipedia:Gilli Smyth with 3 separate links; Wikipedia:Paul Krassner 2 separate links; Wikipedia:Richard Kaczynski 1 link. Currently a search turns up 31 instances of the site on Wikipedia, down from a high of 120 a few weeks ago. The site is not strictly commercial but it is promotional. (Because of my connection, I seem to have trouble staying signed in. --Pigman) 69.19.14.18 20:55, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

www.go-iq.de

is continiously added since mid 2005 by IPs to de:Informationsvermittler (Information Broker) to advert a private bureau. [130], [131], [132], [133], [134], [135], [136] -- Cherubino 09:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Not done yet, if this is only spammed article, you could semiprotect it or something. You should notice that blacklisting blocks the URL from all Wikimedia projects (and several other projects) - and it would be used only when it is really needed. Anyway, this might not be a final decision, you can continue talking. -- mzlla 23:00, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

www.stateuniversity.com

This site posted links in wikipedia for many of the pages listed on their site. Over 100 schools on their site and they are continuing to add more. User:59.145.233.130, User:59.95.66.173, User:59.95.70.60, User:74.134.246.13, User:59.95.70.84, User:59.145.233.130, User:58.68.79.5 These are just a few of the IP's involved. It currently has 68 insertions in Wikipedia.

Also, this site is also connected with these others, many of which were added along with stateuniversity.com: www.encyclopedia.jrank.org www.madehow.com www.referenceforbusiness.com www.nationsencyclopedia.com www.everyculture.com

Done. -- mzlla 22:56, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

unprofessionals.co.uk, surreypolice.co.uk, surreypolice.org, newscotlandyard.co.uk

An attack site being repeatedly spammed to articles on en: by an anon; www(.)unprofessionals(.)co(.)uk - there is absolutely no conceivable way this could ever be appropriately linked, but the IP is dynamic so people are playing whack-a-mole. The "surreypolice" domains have in the past been linked without anyone noticing, because they look legit, but all are the same site. Just zis Guy, you know? 12:50, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Would you be able to give some evidence ie. few links to diffs where this site is added? -- mzlla 13:02, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, en:Surrey Police and en:Metropolitan Police are two I've seen, plus some meta pages. They are being reverted all the time. And another domain added... This edit [137] is fairly typical. Just zis Guy, you know? 20:14, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

difossombrone.it, canelupodisaarloos.com

Website of an italian dog breeder, spamming on dog-related articles. Here are some evidences for your pleasure. Let him know that we hate dogs, ok? involved in some annoying textual spam too which gained the owner a block. --Jollyroger 18:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Not done. Why is it not enough that itwiki blocks the IP responsible? -- mzlla 20:39, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Because they could spam this on other wiki too: they don't seem to care much about policies or warnings. Anyway, this is not a famous or important breeder, so I don't see why just not put it here to prevent further spam. --Jollyroger 23:09, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

keralaz.info

Some weird webhost. Links to recipes.keralaz.info have been spammed around various food articles on the English Wikipedia for a while; see en:Special:Contributions/Joseypeter, en:Special:Contributions/59.92.127.211, en:Special:Contributions/59.92.126.206. Blacklisting the whole site probably wouldn't hurt. --Slowking Man 09:28, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Done (only recipes.keralaz.info). -- mzlla 15:56, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

americanjeans.com

Online store, being spammed to jeans-related articles on en. See en:Special:Contributions/72.134.53.86, en:Special:Contributions/Joseypeter. --Slowking Man 09:28, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Not yet, might be useful site, have to check other wikis if this is needed. -- mzlla 15:56, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

v-tarot.com

Repeatedly spammed to en:Tarot. See en:Special:Contributions/209.162.53.63, en:Special:Contributions/207.67.108.15. --Slowking Man 09:28, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Done. -- mzlla 15:56, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

a-ait.com

Spammed all over the place. --Slowking Man 14:53, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Done. -- mzlla 15:56, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

lemonparty.org

Shock site. I can't even count how many times I've seen people slip it into articles; this is just one example. There's no reason why this shouldn't be blacklisted. --Slowking Man 14:53, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Done. -- mzlla 15:56, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

ambientvisions.com

Some sort of music journal that's regularly inserted into any remotely related articles on en. See en:Special:Contributions/Imajicka and en:Special:Contributions/69.19.14.19. --Slowking Man 14:53, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Not yet, might be useful site, have to check other wikis if this is needed. -- mzlla 15:56, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

www.metalgearsolidforums.com

If you really need evidence I can go get it, but this link is being inserted into several articles on a semi-regular basis. -- Steel ^en:Steel 17:44, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Help with Feng Shui article spam

www.fengshui-xuankong.com,

www.chineseart.com/feng-shui.htm,

www.smilingbamboo.com

I've grown really tired of removing chineseart.com from this article. Chineseart.com only has one short article on Feng Shui. Also tired of smiling bamboo.com It's kind of the Sears Catalog of Feng Shui resources. Finally, the worst of them is the home of flyingstar theory of (etc.) Feng Shui, fengshui-xuankong.com, who seem to check the article twice daily.

Never put up a site for blacklisting before - if you think I'm in error, please visit my talk page. Thanks! en:User_talk:Snackycakes

www.lifeinsurance.newoz.info

Some bots are spamming this site here on meta. I'm currently reverting them, so please check the recent changes page yourself :-) --.anaconda 00:36, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Done. Thank you for your reverting. --Aphaia 00:45, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

They now started with two new sites, both under newoz.info. Can you please blacklist the whole domain? --.anaconda 00:54, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Already *insurance*.newoz.info on the list. My gambits. Can you provide us the info about this domain? --Aphaia 00:59, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Google reports only spam for both newoz.info and newov.info. Both don't have a valid www.* host, so I must trust Google. --.anaconda 01:04, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

jt.org

At least 190 Wikipedia pages are linking to this who a user on the Wikipedia help desk (see link) claims installed a virus or spyware to his computer. It also has copyrighted material that doesn't belong to them, so it might be a good idea to block them anyway. - 87.209.70.231 13:12, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

I came here to report the same site. 58.178.114.57 14:23, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

A few links

Hi, a few pages like Discuter:Phorum on the french WP are being spammed multiple times by a bot. Here are the links added:

• porn-star.bestpornvideosonline.info/index.html
• dreamsexy.info/porno/alba.jpg
• bestwinantivirus.info and lots of subpages

Thanks for adding to the blacklist. PieRRoMaN ¤ Λογος 15:11, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Proposed removals

This section is for proposing that a website be unlisted; please add new entries at the bottom of the section. Remember to provide the specific URL blacklisted, links to the articles they are used in or useful to, and arguments in favour of unlisting. Completed requests will be marked as done or denied and archived. See also /recurring requests for repeatedly proposed (and refused) removals.

anzwers.org

Added based on this, however I found at first sight valid links to anzwers.org/free/universe/. I would propose to not remove the blacklisting, but to restrict it to anzwers.org/trade rather than the whole site. - Andre Engels 10:03, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

"xoomer.alice.it"

Please remove "xoomer.alice.it" from the spam list, because even if there are some websites that may do spam (this happens to any free web space provider) there also are excellent websites about science, and about archaeology and history. I consider that specific websites should be banned, but not the full domain xoomer.alice, which is home of many fresh webmasters and professionals in many subjects.

+1 one of the main italian providers. Please block only the websites involved in spam, not the entire domain --Jollyroger 23:11, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

mtgotraders.com

Please remove www.mtgotraders.com.com from the banned list. This site has many good articles for Magic the Gathering Online and is linked to often by Wizards of the Coast themselves. Site can be useful for MTGO(Magic the Gathering Online.

It seems to be listed per this request. I could be ready to unblacklist it, but I'd like to hear what others say. -- mzlla 19:01, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

While mtgotraders is hardly as "bad" as some other sites, and is in fact a quality website, the fact remains that they committed some fairly bad behavior previously, and did so zealously and constantly. The tactics used previously were disruptive, and by the time someone started to actually talk as opposed to simply aggressively revert, I had already submitted the blacklist request.

Ironically enough, I myself have more liberal standards for external linking than most. However, the consensus should prevail, and so far from edit summaries the consensus seems overwhelmingly against. I posted a topic on allowing mtgotraders and other sites over at en:Talk:Magic: The Gathering#MTGOTraders. It got no replies.

I have no problem with raising the issue again on the talk page, but there should be a clear consensus in favor before removing from the blacklist. 209.73.237.2 21:37, 6 November 2006 (UTC) (SnowFire on en)

I am the owner of mtgotraders and i'm pretty sure I know who did the reverting. He is a friend of mine and probably thought he was helping but in turn got my site blacklisted. I was not aware that he was doing this until I tried to post a beginners guide to MTGO that WOTC also linked to that shows a beginner the basics of MTGO with images/etc. If you could please unblacklist my site I would greatly appreciate it and feel free to ask WOTC themselves about my reputation.

I'm still waiting patiently to be removed. All of my articles are free and I have had at least 3 linked from WOTC articles so far. Please let me know what I need to do.

Done, blacklisting removed, because there were no comments against removing from blacklist during a week. -- mzlla 20:23, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

bloopdiary.com

The following discussion is closed: not done

Please remove www.bloopdiary.com from the banned list. The site does not spam, and has never spammed.

Not done per [138] Naconkantari 15:18, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Those pages do not exist, and the site has taken precautions to prevent the people responsible from using the service.

Strongly recommend against removal per [139] Naconkantari 19:12, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Not done MaxSem 21:19, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

ideamappingsuccess.com

Request 1

Hi,

I feel that unjustly a link to the website Idea Mapping Success which is the site of the founder and book author of Idea Maping (which is also a new page I just added) can not be used due to the spam filter. I am wondering why as it already appears in a couple of related areas in wikipedia, however when adding it as an external link (as the site holding the most examples, both from the book, hiostorical and additional authors) to the Idea map page it triggered the spam filter.

please unblock it so it can justly be put into the page it belongs to. Please keep in mind that this was my first real article I published as well and I am willing to use any advice on how to make it better, so any help will be appreciated.

Thank you, --68.41.131.202 01:38, 5 October 2006 (UTC)Lenroc1999

Not done per [140] Naconkantari 19:37, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Please explain why not? since I am new I would like to understand so I do not pester yoou guys uneccesarily. How is this a spam link? and why? who blacklisted it and under what reasons? how can i get it off the list. Please take the time to help since this is getting frustrating! Lenroc1999 13:53, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's policy on external links, then reach consensus on talk pages of those articles you want your links to be added to, and only then submit request for removal. MaxSem 14:13, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you very much for pointing me to the policy pages MaxSem, you should get a shield for helping a newby :) - I have studied them and politely request removal of the ideamappingsuccess.com link from the spam blacklist or help to relize against what rules it is?

See the point by point answer of the rules for external links at the idea map discussion page and please remove from the blaklist as it clearily does not belong there. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Idea_map Thank you, Lenroc1999 20:54, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Request 2

Dear Wikimedia,

Hello, my name is Jamie Nast. I am the author of a book titled Idea Mapping (John Wiley & Sons, September 2006). If you need more info on my background see ideamappingsuccess.com/aboutus.cfm.

I understand from the person who posted the Idea Mapping Wikipedia entry that my web address is considered spam. He is a great fan and user of idea maps and I was touched by his thoughtfulness in doing this. Now I see huge value in this as previously I was not familiar with much about Wikipedia entries, but let me share a few thoughts on why this external link to www.ideamappingsuccess.com is so critical.

One of the major reasons this book was written was to meet a huge need for people who wanted to learn to create idea maps, but couldn't afford to come to a workshop. So the purpose for linking to these maps is not to try to sell a course. One of the most powerful ways my students have learned over the last 15 years is by seeing the examples of others who have created maps. The maps in the book were not done in color (publisher said i t would be too expensive) and in some cases were too large to see in their entirity. At the core of this website is the ability for others to view the original maps and learn from these examples as well as add their own for others to see. You can view these at ideamappingsuccess.com/maps.cfm?show_all_nav_listmaps1=1.

Not only does this site contain maps from the book, but there are also some from other business professionals, children, and college students for educational purposes. These additional maps will continue to grow in numbers and applications. There are also many idea maps that were created using MindManager software. The applications for idea mapping include brainstorming, creativity, creating a book of knowledge, studying, note-taking, learning, improving memory, organizing your thinking, clarity, and more.

Therefore it would be extremely helpful to learners if an external link to these maps was approved for other sites that relate to those things I've mentioned above including an external link to the maps on the MindManager wikipedia entry. Because idea maps have a heritage in mind mapping, this would also be another helpful site where an external link would be helpful for learners.

My main objective is to create a huge pool of idea maps where learners can come to see a wide diversity of both hand-drawn and electronic maps. All maps are for public viewing and can be shared with no need for approvals. We just ask that the author of the map is creditted. These maps are not available on any other sites.

I am the world's leading authority on idea mapping, and I would be so pleased if you could make these idea maps a reference and learning tool for more people by allowing these links.

Warm Regards,

Jamie Nast jamie@ideamappingsuccess.com 1-866-896-1024

For the record, the addition was discussed earlier this month. —[admin] Pathoschild 00:38, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

The Ledge

Dear Wikipedia, Why have I been added to the Spam Blacklist? The Ledge is a wonderful site about literature, with unique and reliable information. The site is run by professionals in the Dutch literary world. sincerely, Rin 11:03, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Lostpedia.com

There has been a precident set by the inclusion of w:Memory Alpha and w:Wookieepedia on Wikipedia and allowing the links to that site. This article is also under deletion review [141] so it makes it very difficult to present evidence if you cannot link to Lostpedia.com in the article itself. Futhermore the user who requested the blacklisting is a known vandal on lostpedia.com and has a bias, himself editing the w:Memory Alpha article [142] and being a member of Memory Alpha [143], but requesting deletion of Lostpedia's article, incorrectly, as he claimed it was a repost, when in fact it was a complete rewrite. --90.192.92.101 21:50, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Image links

The filter wouldn't let me save a change to en:Iosif Stalin tank where a previous editor had linked to an image: http://www.anyboard [dot] net/gov/mil/anyboard/uploads/Type122%294_18446.jpg. The image is in no way spam, and I can't find any substitutes for it. —Michael Z.

blog.newarker.info

Linked from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newark%2C_New_Jersey. Seems this is mistakenly being caught by the regex: \.new(a|e|i|o|u|y)[0-9a-z-]*\.info

It's should be fixed now. Naconkantari 02:54, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

atlan.ohost.de & atlan.at.ohost.de

Please unlist these pages. It's my own Homepage. The first one will redirect to the second one, because it's easier to remember. I tried to use these links for my user profile on de.wikipedia.org, but both are blacklisted and I don't know why. --Eick Wagner 12:58, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Not done, please request whitelisting on your local wiki.

unoriginal.co.uk

I have attempted to create a page for this website, and noticed it's on the blacklist. I note part of the reason for this is due to the site being seen as little more than Google adverts and adult links.

This seems unfair as whilst there is advertising on the site, it also clearly contains gigabytes worth of content (clips, games, etc.), none of which seem overtly adult nature. The site is clearly popular, currently in the top two search results for popular terms like 'funny clips' on both Google UK and Yahoo UK. Whilst I understand that popularity alone is obviously not enough for a site to be removed from a blacklist, similar offerings like miniclips.com do have a listing. Fisichella-speed 17:26, 30 October 2006 (GMT)

zuggy.wz.cz

This is the current official site of w:SubRip, the best subtitle ripping software. I have no idea why it is blacklisted. It may seem outdated (last News item is from June) but that's because SubRip is abandonware at the moment. It's the most reliable source for downloading SubRip. I think it's better to link here than to some random ad-ridden download farm where you don't know if what you get is the real thing or a trojan.--87.162.70.231 23:21, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Please request whitelisting on your local wiki. Naconkantari 17:31, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

www -dot- pseudology -dot- org

www -dot- pseudology -dot- org- contains information about Russian opposition leaders, links are used in Russian wikipedia articles ru:Хакамада, Ирина Муцуовна, ru:Старовойтова, Галина Васильевна (murdered in 1998) --Ilya K 18:57, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Actually, this site was blacklisted after spammer added most of those links. MaxSem 21:21, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

awardspace.com

'awardspace.com' is a free webhosting service. The typical website name is 'mypage.awardspace.com'. The fact that some 'alanburn.awardspace.com' did spamming, doesn't mean that all sites ending in 'awardspace.com' should be blocked. (30-11-06) Thank you.

There are many sites from awardspace.com that are used for spamming. Please request whitelisting particular subdomains on your local wiki. Naconkantari 18:25, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Done. The whole service is not listed any more. I hope that the spamming doesn't start by other hosted sites, then we have to blacklist it again. -- mzlla 13:24, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

I tried including a link to my home page at awardspace.com on my user page at Wikipedia.org only to say it was still blocked. My page is at 'outrider.awardspace.com' 69.208.89.247 01:12, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Yes, actually awardspace remains in blacklist. MaxSem 08:03, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

You should talk about this by Naconkantari. I would recommend removing awardspace.com from blacklist, but he does not accept it. Or the other way, ask whitelisting in English Wikipedia. -- mzlla 11:07, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Daniel Brandt sites

The following discussion is closed: no way

I notice that the Daniel Brandt page on the English Wikipedia cannot link to his websites, which were placed on the Spam blacklist because they used to refer Wikipedians elsewhere. This was true the last time someone requested that these links be removed, but it is apparently no longer the case, and the discussion page for Daniel Brandt seems largely in favor of including traditional-style (rather than cut-and-paste) links. Though I just stumbled onto this article last night, I have to agree that actual links to pages like Wikipedia Watch and Google Watch would have obvious merit in this article. Though at least one user has argued that he "might do it again," i.e. redirecting our links elsewhere, I feel that a notice of his prior dirty tricks above the links is preferable to this accidental censorship via the spam blacklist. --Ourboldhero 17:20, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Request denied. Firstly, it's not "accidental censorship" - we are quite intentionally excluding his sites from being linked in Wikipedia. He's made it his mission to "out" as many administrators as possible by posting their personal information (in some cases, personal information of young children). I see no reason why we should allow his idiocy to be linked from Wikipedia. And yes, there's always the possiblity he'll do it again. Raul654 18:35, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

While his sites may be against Wikipedia, Wikipedia should provide the linkage. It seems "broken" to have the website address and not a hyperlink. Ndp2005goh 03:29, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

ytmnd.com

I was going to modify the Italian ytmnd entry, but it turns out that I can't link any page from ytmnd.com... I can understand that single pages are blocked, but I would like to be able to link at least the home page.

Thanks --NikeXTC 10:40, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Not done, because it is not possible nowadays. There is not possibility to block only single pages, blacklisting is affecting to whole domain. It is possible to allow linking to some of the subdomains, that request to whitelisting should be placed your own wiki. -- mzlla 16:17, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

In en: we have locally whitelisted www.ytmnd.com and wiki.ytmnd.com, so they can be linked on the en:YTMND article, but the ytmnd site is generally blacklisted because of the tendency of YTYMNDers to (a) add YTMNDs to mainstream articles, (b) create and link to YTMNDs which violate copyright, (c) abuse Wikipedia for viral marketing and (d) create and link to attacks on Wikipedians. It took a lot of work to get that compromise hammered out, and it works well enough. Just zis Guy, you know? 17:21, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

forum.univers-hentai.com

hentai.com is blocked (good idea), but one should unblock forum.univers-hentai.com, because it is used as a source on the FR wiki on fr:Liste de termes sexuels japonais. nojhan 00:40, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Not done, please request whitelisting on your local wiki first. Naconkantari 02:30, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

J'ai ajouté les adresses leforumhentai.com et forum.univers-hentai.com dans la liste blanche locale : [144]. Korg + ⁺ 05:34, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

www.alphaworks.ibm.com

AlphaWorks at IBM was already supposed to be reopened (see removal archive for May 2006 but is still blocked. Many new technologies and documents are made available by IBM via alphaWorks (including my own "Virtual XML Garden" referenced on the in the wikipedia). Krisrose 19:00, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Done. -- mzlla 20:15, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

ravenholm.wz.cz/english.html

This is the website for a single-player Half-Life 2 mod. It seems to have been blacklisted for some reason, but I honestly don't know why. It's a simple, already-completed mod.--72.74.238.57 20:45, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Not done. The whole wz.cz-domain is blacklisted by Amgine. If there is some heavy arguments to remove it, you should say them. Otherwise, please request whitelisting in wiki, where you need that link. -- mzlla 21:07, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

OK, understood. If you don't mind my asking, what's so bad about the domain? Do 90% of sites under it have spyware or something?--72.74.238.57 21:10, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Exactly I don't know. It seems to be added by Amgine, who gave no reasons to it. [145] There have been three times someone proposing the its removal from blacklist; [146], [147] and [148]. There might be something of which you might be interested. -- mzlla 21:35, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

www.justachat.com

I'm not sure the original reason for this blacklisting, but I'm trying to use a link to this site as a reference in a new wikipedia article, w:en:User:Afolentes/Kewlchat_Network_draft. Any help would be appreciated. Afolentes 07:53, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

You can localy override this list by adding the domain to the MediaWiki:Spam-whitelist page. Example; w:nl:MediaWiki:Spam-whitelist --Walter Do you have news? Report it to Wikizine 07:58, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank you, I just added a request to whitelist the site at w:en:MediaWiki_talk:Spam-whitelist. I still think it might be worth removing the blacklist entry entirely, though, depending on what reason it was added in the first place. --Afolentes 08:43, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

www.surfbirds.com

Hi. Surfbirds appears to have been added to the spam blacklist; however any of the bird articles editors over at Wikpedia will tell you that this is not a sensible idea - Surfbirds contains a large (& growing) amount of useful reference material which is of a nature appropriate to add to external links & references sections of articles. Could someone remove it please (preferably in such a way that it doesn't get accidentally re-added, if that's possible). Thanks. 82.45.38.31 19:19, 16 November 2006 (UTC) (Wikipedia editor SP-KP)

Done. It doesn't get re-added unless some administrator have reasons to add it - and then it is not accidental. -- mzlla 19:36, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

www.greatestjournal.com

Hi. GreatestJournal is a blog-hosting site where some celebrities described in Russian Wikipedia keep their blogs; for example, link to ru:Холмогоров, Егор Станиславович's list of works published around 2005 (the list itself is in a GJ posting) now gets filtered out of wiki. —Mithgol the Webmaster 05:52, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Not done. The whole Wikimedia does not need this site, so you have to request whitelisting in Russian Wikipedia. -- mzlla 12:30, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

hematology.netfirms.com

While several netfirms addresses are named in the blacklist separately, this does not seem to be one of them, yet the spam filter blocks it. This is a legit site in Hebrew containing valid medical information. The links are also to legit sites, so I'm not sure why it's blocked. Odedee 21:09, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

The whole netfirms.com seems to be banned too by Naconkantari. You may ask unblacklisting it in User talk:Naconkantari or you can request whitelisting in your own wiki. -- mzlla 21:50, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Not done, please request whitelisting at your local wiki. Naconkantari 21:54, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

kspope.com

Please remove kspope.com from the banned list. It provides free access to peer-reviewed journal articles on psychology, ethics and malpractice. Seems a bit weird to me that it was banned in the first place. --Biaothanatoi 23:24, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Done. I think it was blacklisted accidentally while blacklisting the site pope.com. Anyway, now you are able to link kspope.com -- mzlla 23:45, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

thebookstandard.typepad.com

Please take thebookstandard.typepad.com off of the banned list. The site is a new blog that discusses video content related to books. The blog is the first of its kind and, in addition to featuring videos, also discusses news related to book videos and online promotions and reports on how authors and publishers can create their own videos. It is a helpful site for anyone interested in a creative new way to promote books. The book trailer/teaser/video trend is a hot topic in publishing and the site has been referenced on various author's Wikipedia pages (though mostly now removed), including the site for CollegeHumor.com [149]. (The editors for the popular site wrote a book and created a video to promote it, which was featured on thebookstandard.typepad.com.) Authors like Meg Cabot, Michael Connelly and more also have created videos to promote their books and Wikipedia users should be able to find out more information about this trend. The website thebookstandard.typepad.com is run by the editors of the online magazine The Book Standard and review magazine Kirkus Reviews [150].

The specified site is blacklisted per [151]. I oppose removing it to blacklist, but waiting also other comments. -- mzlla 20:16, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

This is a legitimate resource for learning more about book videos and trailers, which are becoming popular with authors and publishers. Bookgirl 19:38, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

www.koniczynka.prv.pl

I grant that I am not fluent in Polish, but it appears that this site is legitimately for the Polish poet Halina Poświatowska, her bio, works, etc. 128.208.228.87 22:04, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Oops, forgot to login first. Bsktcase 22:08, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Naconkantari has blacklisted the whole domain prv.pl, and we should ask his opinions too. Note that its removing is already discussed at [152], where it leaded no changes. Anyway, I would support removing, but I think we should wait other opinions too. -- mzlla 22:11, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

www.Salvador-Dali.net

ArtsMode Network is a legal company sited in Figueres, just front the Salvador Dali Museum and Foundation.

The company was created in 1989 and we are the owners of various artworks of Salvador Dali, including “La Toile Daligram”, which is reproduced in the home page of www.Salvador-Dali.net. This web site is mainly dedicated to “Dali-News” and essays about Salvador Dali, in part created by people who works for ArtsMode, like “Els tres P Mesons” which articles you can see in “Wide articles and essays” (if you decide to visit it). This website is the result of years of hard work compiling information (written information) about the world of Salvador Dali, and we are very proud about it, enough to consider that it is a very useful tool for Wikipedia people really interested in Salvador Dali who wants or need to consult as much information as possible. In that way, we try to place a link to this information in Salvador Dali places, including Wikipedia.

Is one of the most visited web sites related with Salvador Dalí. Dali News and wide articles and essays have a wide collection of articles about Salvador Dalí, his life, Gala, Museums, Surrealism, etc.

Can be considered the removal of the blacklist, please?

Thanks for your comprehension,

--ManuelBrau 17:54, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

I asked blacklisting a few weeks ago, for repeated adding of the link to almost ALL the wikipedias. Link was provided with a babelfish translation of sth like "news about salvador dalì". Lots of diffs were provided, some were edit wars involving admins Vs anonimous. I got legal treaths from the owner of the site (who accidentally was the same who put the link. Whoops!). Twice. In a VERY aggressive way. The website do not host any valuable information that can not be found in any other more reliable primary source (like museum websites or official sites of the Dalì Foundation). Still can't see what kind of "news" you can provide about a dead painter... Moreover it is a commercial business, selling stuff vaguely related to Dalì artworks. The linked page was about a bag with dalì sketches on it, if my memory doesn't fail me.

STRONGLY against blacklist removal --Jollyroger 23:20, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Not done There is no evidence that the spam will cease.

--M/ 23:23, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

MonicaPotter.wz.cz

Hi, my name is Miro and I am author of this Monica Potter Fan Page - monicapotter.wz.cz. I do not know why is this page blacklisted. Is there any reason?

The whole wz.cz-domain is blacklisted, there is no specific reason why your subdomain should be. There is no talk page where is the reasons, and I would support this domain to removed from blacklist. However, we should discuss about it before removing.

If the page can't get removed you are able to request your subdomains whitelisting in local wiki. -- mzlla 22:07, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

We discussed it a while ago, and the result were local whitelists - the wz.cz domain is now whitelisted on the Czech Wikipedia. — Timichal 23:03, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Yes, I have seen that page already. I'm just thinking that why is the wz.cz -domain blacklisted, and could it be removed. If there are only some subdomains spamming I think that blacklisting these may be better solution. -- mzlla 11:28, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

I do not understand what shall I do, I just want to add my link to the site of Monica Potter in Wikipedia - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monica_Potter . If you know how, please do it, I do not know how. Thanks. Miro, webmaster of monicapotter.wz.cz

servemp3.com

I attempted to add a link to "jazz901.servemp3.com:80/wgmc.mp3" to the en:WGMC article; it's a link to the radio station's official webcasting stream. servemp3 is on the blacklist. We even have "webcast" as a field in the radio station infobox; not being able to link to it is kind of strange. Powers ^T 13:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Not done, there are now reasons why every Wikipedias should be able to link this site. You could ask about whitelisting jazz901.servemp3.com in enwikipedia. -- mzlla 19:57, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

omninerd.com

I found this site recently and visit it daily. I noticed it didn't have a wiki page so I tried to create and found that it is blacklisted. I found this odd as the site is not spammy in nature. Anyway, it seemed like a candidate for removal (unless there's something I'm unaware of). 69.181.24.54 21:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

They were spamming en: like mad about a year ago with tangentially related external links. Some of their content is good, but a lot is substandard, and there was no more granular URL pattern that would describe the links we were being spammed with. - Jmabel 19:51, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Ah, I see. Well, anyway, I like it. :-) Is there a time limit for the ban? or a way to create a page, but with no links to the site? If not, no worries. I'm just bored and thought I'd make my first wiki page. ... oh, and by the way, is there a "recommendations" list for wiki code? I typed up A LOT about this site, previewed it, and was all pumped to submit when I was slammed by the black list error. I understand the black list, but I think someone should be told prior to being able to type an article. If there's a better place to bring this up, let me know. 69.181.24.54 06:24, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

galeon.com

All of the spamlinks that we were hit with are of the form "…galeon.com/zswift/…". I suspect that we should narrow the pattern so as not to block an entire hosting site over one spamming user. There are some extremely useful documents about the Spanish Civil War elsewhere on that site. Thanks for your help on this, and can you ping me on en: when you respond. If this is a problem, can we at least whitelist URLs beginning with www.guerracivil1936.galeon.com? - Jmabel 19:51, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

We are not able to blacklist only URLs, the whole (sub)domain is blacklisted at once. You should ask whitelisting in your own wiki. -- mzlla 05:44, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Rodzimy Kosciol Polski

I don't know if this is an error, but when I go to edit Polytheistic reconstructionism the religious site http://www.r-k-p.prv.pl (Rodzimy Kosciol Polski) is black-listed. I think this is probably a mistake. Any clarification or explanation would be helpful. - WeniWidiWiki 05:16, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

The whole prv.pl is blacklisted, but it may be going to removed (see: Talk:Spam blacklist#www.koniczynka.prv.pl) -- mzlla 05:47, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

funpic.de/org

Funpic is a widely-known German free webspace provider featuring 2500MB web space, PHP, FTP uploads, up to 8 MySQL databases for free. I use it to host my wordpress blog (http://pallando14.pa.funp*c.de/wordpress/) and wrote an article about a musician there. I tried to link it as a source for a discussion about an article, but the spam filter told me funpic was on the spam list. --84.192.157.219 22:02, 4 December 2006 (UTC) (German Wikipedia: Pallando / English Wikipedia Pallando14)

I personally don't have anything against replacing that with (favyr|gamenline).(fa|ga).funpic.org . But I'd wait few days if there is other opinions. It could be removed, because it is not unverifying any more (see: Spam blacklist/Log#September) -- mzlla 05:42, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Am I wrong or blogs are not a valid linkable source anyway? --Jollyroger 23:22, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

TVRage.com

The "spam"-links have all been removed, and the main person who did most of the linking left both wikipedia, and the specific site in question. The sites a good source, unless articles have a tv.com (which most don't). Original requester en:User:MatthewFenton and the other guy en:User:JohnQ.Public had a vendetta against eachother, so request was biased in the first place. Even though the site doesn't meet en:WP:Web, it's still a resourceful site for lesser known articles, and foreign language wikis, because, unlike the main tv site- tv.com, which is notable, but it's not a good resource for foreign wikis. TVRage has info in languages in other languages, such as Portugese, French, German, etc. that IMDB and TV.com have. I'm a member at each, and wikipedia, and (obviously) just joined the Meta Wiki, and want to become more active in the Wiki Communities.The site isn't as useful as TV.com, but the supposed link-spam were all relevent to the articles they added, but added by users who didn't quite understand WP:LINK at the time. I'm still going through, removing links that are unnessary, but I feel that the site is useful in some cases, and can be easily removed if unnessary from articles. --Linalu24 22:27, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Not done. Blacklisted per [153] and I think it will not be removed. If some foreign language wiki needs it, someone from them could go here to request removing or they can whitelist this site in their wiki. -- mzlla 20:36, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Spammed on a daily basis? As if. That's a bit of an exaggeration. That is what I don't understand- Some articles have a bunch of links to blogs, and irrelevent crap, and are kept, even in featured articles, yet a single link is added to a stub without any links, and it's considered spam? I've read Wiki's policy about that over, and over again, and yet I don't quite get it. Just because Matthew Fenton, who is biases towards the site because he's a member of the competitor site, doesn't like the other site, doesn't mean it should be blacklisted. He's one of those editors who take control of articles, and act like they own them, and will revert any change not made by them. en:User:JohnQ.Public isn't, and was never the webmaster, or site owner of TVRage. He was an editor, yes, but that doesn't represent the whole site. He left the site anyways. Being "Spammed on a daily basis". Er, how about a Day basis. It only happened that one day. Any editor could easily revert it. He was later banned from wikipedia anyways, so it's not like he could re-add it. Matthew instead runs to meta wiki, using it as a perfect chance to get rid of his competition with an easy excuse. Okay, so let me get this straight? - If one of you admins here agrees with the Proposer, you get to black list them, and decide if or if not to unblacklist them. I'd rather have a couple admins decide weather or not weather sites should be blacklisted or not, instead of a person just "Oh, I hate that site, BLACKLISTED". I mean, if it was a real legit reason, then I'd understand, but I think it's silly. Maybe a few more admins could give their thoughts. I'm trying to remain civil. I'm sorry if I sound uncivil, but I'm tired, so I probably sound angry. Sorry. Ugh..it just doesn't make sense. It just seems so exaggerated IMO. Please, may I get the opinions of other editors? -Linalu24 07:18, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Ridiculous. TVRage is an excellent resource for television shows, which is where those links were placed. They were not spammed, they were improvements. TVRage is a replacement for the old TVTome, which was bought by CNet and turned into the crapola that is now TV.com. TVRage is a much better resource for Wikipedia to use, it isn't covered with advertisements and it uses a simple layout instead of all the flash and other junk cluttering up TV.com. Even if the owner of TVRage is adding links to articles on TV shows, it is completely irrelevant. TVRage should not be blocked. --Stufff 01:27, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

centralpacificbank.com

Central Pacific Bank is a major bank in the State of Hawaii. I don't know why their main corporate site (I tried both www.centralpacificbank.com and centralpacificbank.com) was blocked, but discovered such when I tried to create an article about the bank on the English Wikipedia. I was able to use an alternate domain cpbi.com which redirects to their site for the External link section. -- 24.152.186.89 06:26, 6 December 2006 (UTC) (Hawaiian717 on English Wikipedia)

jewsdidwtc.com

This site is a reference for en:9/11_conspiracy_theories, under the section "Claims related to Jews and Israel." Currently, the address is posted but is not able to be made into a URL due to being listed on the blacklist. While the site may present a distasteful anti-semetic message which I do not agree with, putting it on the spam black list is an abuse of said list, which renders harm to the article in question. Please remove. --User:stufff 21:12, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

sacmun.awardspace.com

This web page is made by students from Colegio San Carlos, Bogota, Colombia. It only purpose is to serve as an information guide to those schools and academic institutions which will participate in the MUN model that is being organized by San Carlos school and that will take place in February, 2007. I will thank you if you can remove this address from the blacklist, in order for me to add this link in the San Carlos wikipage as well as in the MUN's one. Thank you for your time.

syganar.galeon.com

In the page es:Saber_y_Ganar the link to the site syganar.galeon.com it´s only a link to a page of fans of the show. Include phrases from the show´s contestants, not spam.

Troubleshooting and problems

This section is for comments related to problems with the blacklist (such as incorrect syntax or entries not being blocked), or problems saving a page because of a blacklisted link. This is not the section to request that an entry be unlisted (see Proposed removals above).

w:en:Talk:American World University

The above wikipedia page contains a blacklisted link repeatedly. Not sure how to remove it without also completing erasing the discussion. Badbilltucker 01:42, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Done, blacklisted links removed from that page. You can now use it again. -- mzlla 14:04, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

digiads.com.au

Hello

I am the owner of the site digiads.com.au and I think that my site was added to the blacklist [154] for no clear reason even after having re-reviewed the external linking policy. Could you please let us know why? Our articles are useful for content and images as well as directly related to the respective wiki page, 7,500 email subscribers think the content is informative, why is it voilating wiki external link policy? Our news section has been up for over 2 years and so we have many others who think our pages are far from spam.

I am preplexed to the reason for our ban as the wiki pages we had links now there are similar type news articles being linked to - specifically.

• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aston_Martinq => www.newport-pagnell.co.uk/
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Motors_Corsa => www.autoblog.com/2006/06/05/nice-rack-vauxhall-courts-cyclists-with-2007-corsa-five-door/
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferrari_599_GTB_Fiorano => www.goldarths.com/Regulars/Reviews%5Fand%5FCommentary/Ferrari599GTB/
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferrari_599_GTB_Fiorano => www.rideroom.com/news_comments.php?id=1004
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevrolet_HHR => www.hhrclub.org/ - they are previewing same news stories as us

Most of the above are advertising supported and so are hundreds of other sites on wiki so I cannot see this as a reason....

We would very much appreciate some explanaton and some double checking would show you that our site is counter to user Decromin who reported the links.

Thanks

Nowisau

free-game-downloads.mosw.com

Supposedly blacklisted at 21:48 on 11 October, this edit came in at 22:30, see [155]. Is there a problem? Thatcher131 02:55, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

It seems to be blocked. There may have been a slight delay in copying the blacklist to all of the wikis. 128.83.138.174 16:22, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

A problem

The following discussion is closed: fixed

I encounter Spam protection filter when I do any edition in the Ja'far al-Sadiq even an Enter or full stop.--Sa.vakilian 04:53, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

I've removed the blacklisted link from that article so it's editable again. Angela 12:10, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

greatestjournal.com

The following discussion is closed: answered

This is the first time I ever saw the spam blacklist message. It is on the LiveJournal article.--B&W Anime Fan 13:59, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

It was added because a bot was spamming it [156] 128.83.138.174 16:01, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

riverstonebooks.netfirms.com

I asked earlier for the site www.riverstonebooks.netfirms.com to be unblocked. This hasn:t been done, possibly due to confusion with the site riverstonebooks.com. The link concerned is on the page about the NZ writer　composerIvan Bootham. Grateful if someone could fix this. Thanks Philip Marshall

Please request whitelisting on your local wiki. Naconkantari 17:32, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Flymissoula.com

I am the administrator for Flymissoula.com, the OFFICIAL website for the Missoula International Airport in Missoula, Montana. I want to know why this address keeps getting removed from the Missoula Airport Wiki page? This is not a spam site, fake page or otherwise. It is the OFFICIAL airport website! Any other airport in this country is allowed to provide a link on Wiki, so why is this such a problem for Flymissoula.com? Please remove this from the blacklist immediately and allow me to post this hyperlink without further harassment.

Done, blacklisting of flymissoula.com is now removed. I think that Amgine has blacklisted by mistake, when listing missoula.com. Sorry for the inconvenience. -- mzlla 13:34, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

termine.c-base.info

Hello, i can not add the site to our Berlin meetup discussion page de:Wikipedia Diskussion:Berlin. Why? I didn't found this link in the spam list. --BLueFiSH ✉ 15:33, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

an other link was the problem. this link is not blacklisted. --BLueFiSH ✉ 16:13, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

www.stikipad.com

Not sure why this was added; it's an excellent wiki farm with free and paid options, which I use myself (and am a satisfied free customer ONLY; I get no reward for boosting this site). Please remove!

Done. The only spamming I've found was [157], and zwai.stikipad.com is (and should be) blacklisted. -- mzlla 20:33, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Conceptual problems

I wasn't aware of the spam blacklist until I was just researching a topic, and tried to remove a dead link. I cannot remove the link because another link is blacklisted (I visited it, and it is 100% legit - doesn't even contain any ads). So what do I do? I can't save my edit removing the bad link as long as this blacklisted link is in place, but yet it is perfectly valid and I don't want to remove it just because Wikipedia thinks its spam. The article is Karel (programming language), the first link (link removed because the spam filter blocked it - but only when I actually submitted this post) is triggering the spam filter, the last link Robot Karol++ is what I'm trying to remove. So my comments on the spam filter system:

• If a blacklisted url is already present in an article, then editing should not trigger the spam filter. This will result in people trying to contribute something valid, receiving a warning because of a legacy url, which will likely result in their giving up and not consummating their edit.
• The spam warning should appear when previewing an edit, not just when submitting. If it doesn't appear during previews then the system will potentially waste even more of the contributor's time.
• This system takes edit wars to a whole new level. I've seen many edit wars between owners of competing websites. The spam system gives them a nice mechanism to make even more grief for their "enemy". The system certainly has uses, and at this point could possibly even be considered a necessity, however it will certainly cause new problems of its own (and hopefully they won't cause as much or more grief than the system is supposed to alleviate).
• A formal method of resolving purported spam entries that already exists in articles at the time the site was blacklisted needs to be devised. Otherwise you're putting spam removal off onto all contributors. Any other type of "housecleaning" at wikipedia happens in specific sessions. For example, I will scan articles looking for specific issues I'm wanting to resolve (usually style issues). Bots do this type of thing all the time. The way this spam filter is currently working completely breaks the normal paradigm of editing at Wikipedia. I propose it be taken down until the various issues can be properly addressed.

The moral of the story: I was trying to make a very quick, casual edit to correct an error while in "view only" mode (ie, I wasn't visiting Wikipedia to contribute, but to view information). I see I cannot make my edit because of the spam filter, so now I've got to go through an arduous process (list the site to be removed from the blacklist, monitor said site to see if / when it is removed, finally make edit) just to make one simple correction. So in a wonderful twist of irony, the broken link, which results in a page containing nothing but advertising, will remain in the story because of a good link that Wikipedia thinks is spam. I see a couple other instances of this happening to other people as posted above - those are just the cases people have taken the time to post here about. It's hard to tell how many good edits this system is preventing that are not reported. --Dan East 15:49, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

The link in question has been added to the whitelist. The link that was causing problems is from of a host that is continually used for spamming across multiple wikis. The spam filter will not be disabled for any reason due to the massive amounts of spam received. The method of requesting whitelisting on your local wiki or removal here is currently the best solution. Thanks Naconkantari 16:56, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

inter wiki links

I'm trying to add an inter-wiki link, "[[he:אל ליסיצקי]]" in the English and Dutch wikipedias. I get the same spam message, that links me here. What's wrong here?

• de page
• en page

thanks, yellowblood

Done. These pages contained blacklisted link(s) and now I removed them and you are able to edit them again. -- mzlla 14:09, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Bidding fee scheme

Tried to remove what appears to be a self added link spam by User:Iphooka under Example sites for a company called Iphooka. All of the edits of this user pertain to the company. When I tried to remove the edit would not save as the above page is blacklisted. Thanks Doc 19:45, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

en:Talk:Franscisco Franco

I tried adding something to en:Talk:Franscisco Franco en:Talk:Francisco Franco and now cannot save, apparently (after 10 minutes of investigation) because the page contains a link to a site on www.galeon.com. So, I tried removing "http://" from the front of that link (I don't want to remove it entirely, it's clearly relevant to the discussion), and I still can't save.

Why doesn't the spam filter "can't save" message give some indication of the offending link? This has been a real waste of time, which must be repeated several times daily; I'm guessing that most people in these circumstances just give up on editing the page.

Further, galeon.com appears to be a hosting site. Are we sure we want to blacklist it entire?

If someone would ping me at en:user talk:Jmabel when they answer this, it would be appreciated, I'm not normally on meta.- Jmabel 01:49, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

The specified talk page does not exist any more, so we don't have to remove the link. Naconkantari seems have blacklisted galeon.com because of this, and if you think that it should be removed from blacklist we should discuss about it first. -- mzlla 06:18, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, I typo'd; that is, of course en:Talk:Francisco Franco, the former ruler of Spain. I note that on the linked diff, all of the spamlinks are "…galeon.com/zswift/…", I suspect that you should narrow the pattern so as not to block an entire hosting site over one spamming user. Thanks for your help on this, and can you ping me again when you respond. - Jmabel 06:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Other discussions

• Spam blacklist policy discussion

Installation on third party sites

The following discussion is closed.

I realize nobody here is responsible for troubleshooting Spam blacklist installation on other sites. But can someone point me in the right direction? I can't seem to figure out what's going wrong and the documentation page isn't any help. I've described my problem on its talk page. Thanks for any help. --Sam Odio 00:03, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Please make sure you have the most recent version, as the old version didn't like long lists. Naconkantari 00:08, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

It should be the most recent version, I downloaded last week from the sourceforge cvs. Does anyone know of an appropriate mailing list / IRC channel where I can ask for spamlist troubleshooting advice? Thanks, --Sam Odio 22:07, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Try mediawiki-l or #mediawiki on freenode. // [admin] Pathoschild (^talk/_map) 01:40, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

A way to fight off some spambots

A lot of spammers use generic bots that crawl pages seeking for <textarea> tag, then fill it with spam and submit. On MediaWiki sites this results in vandalous edits like this[158]. My idea is to block all external links that don't follow wiki syntax, that is <a href="blahblahbla">, [url] and so on. I've filed a feature request on this. Comments and suggestions are welcome. MaxSem 17:03, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

How would someone find and replace links in pages that have the "old-style" links in them? Naconkantari 19:44, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Quick search in the English Wikipedia shows that almost no page use it (most results are either irrelevant or have <a href= inside of <nowiki> tag e.g. Framekiller). In case there's still some such links left they'll trigger protection next time they're edited with message what to do, much like Spam blacklist works. I don't think there will be any significant collateral damage, and benefit from such measure could be nice. MaxSem 20:35, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Hello I would like to contribute to DROHOBYCH but there is a spam protection filter Please remove this filter. (I do not wish to remove the generating external link because I checked it and looks like a valid and serious link) thank you

Blacklist shock sites.

While using VandalProof lately I've noticed a number of IP vandals replacing external links with links to shock sites such as Meatspin/etc. I see no reason why these shouldn't be blocked, as they obviously have no valid place in Wikipedia. Dark Shikari 05:05, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Could you please provide some diff links to the vandalism? Naconkantari 05:06, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Here's an example. Its not that its that common, its just that there is no encyclopedic use for linking to shock sites, as far as I can tell, and an overlooked shock site link could cause havoc. Dark Shikari 01:27, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Done. I have seen spamming with these too, and I can't imagine any valid use for these. Meatspin blacklisted, if you know other like that I can blacklist them too. -- mzlla 18:47, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

But I dont see why you should be blacklisting meatspin.com, I worked so hard to put it in the shock site pege as an example -- User:Santiago_Roybal

User pages

These should be removed from user pages as well? --ChrisGriswold 07:18, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

These are not removed automatically, but you are unable to save page which contain one of blacklisted hosts. -- mzlla 13:28, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Regex pattern: fetch\.php\?media\=

I am using Regex pattern fetch\.php\?media\= to block the spammer who did this:

katrinahelp.info/wiki/index.php?title=Editing_Guidelines&oldid=25117

The spammer used 3 domain names and left 300 links while removing the original content.

To add injury to insult, the Diff and Rollback features were disabled on that page by the spam content. Not sure if it is a page size effect or a syntax effect.

You may want to find your own filter to block him.

--jwalling 23:10, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

That's rather odd... I've never seen a case where the spam screws up the diff engine. Naconkantari 00:20, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

The system administrator has not isolated the problem yet. I have seen this problem once before on our wiki server, so it may be a memory allocation limit triggered by diffing a very large post. --jwalling 21:13, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Amgine's alphaworks\.ibm\.com

Is blocking access to what appears to be a normal IBM site. Any ideas why? Thanks 69.106.232.37 22:41, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Already unblacklisted. -- mzlla 09:29, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

encyclopediadramatica\.com

Why is this Page on the Blacklist? OK its a very ironic wiki, but however, everyone who gets on it should see, thats just for fun. I dont see anything bad on this.

There's some difference between "irony" and "personal attack". They've declared war on us, no point in attracting even more auditory to them by linking ED fron Wikimedia projects. MaxSem 06:46, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't think this is a fair use of the spam blacklist --Jollyroger 08:43, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

You can find reasons for blacklisting here. -- mzlla 09:27, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Still don't think that "they mock us, they are bad" is a valid excuse for blacklisting. --Jollyroger 16:28, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Not done anyway. There has been unallowed using of this site so many times, that it should be blacklisted. If you wan't the link there in some specified wiki, it is possible (though I do not recommend), ask whitelisting there. But this is not possible e.g. in enwiki, ArbCom has denied linking before the site got blacklisted. -- mzlla 17:01, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Please read the requirements of use for the spam blacklist, particularly that part that says to "Only blacklist ... widespread, unmanageable spam." The fact that Encyclopedia Dramatica was banned does not make it spam, and including it in this list is a blatant abuse of the guidelines as they are clearly stated. Unless there is a consensus to change the requirements for a domain to be blacklisted in the spam blacklist, this must be removed. --Stufff 01:36, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

silentnight.info

What has happend to silentnight.info, why ist it spam and who was the link-spammer?

Its non-commercial aim is to follow the roots of the Christmas carol "Silent Night! Holy Night!". The Hightlight is the broadcasting of the Silent Night Memorial Celebration on the 24th of december as an audio-live-stream. Its webcam has been installed within the project "Bräuche im Salzburger Land", which is CD-ROM series in three parts, published by the province of Salzburg and its institute for ethnology.

I am the webmaster of this website and im interested in the reasons of blocking this url?

M7 has blacklisted it with reason "spam on several wikies" at November 23. He might give your more details. --mzlla 22:58, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

I confirm the blacklisting of this domain as spam, repeated several times

• Repeated spam inserts: it
• Subsequent editwar about an image removal request it
• Spam run observed across several wikies nl nn no et al.

--M/ 23:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

What can I do as webmaster to prevent this spam? ...so if i want to push out a competitor i announce the link for several times an it is blocked?

What are the possibilities to get deleted from the spam list? It's the website to the location of Oberndorf near Salzburg, where the famous christmas carol Silent Night had been performed for the very first time. The Celebration on the 24th of december in front of the Silent Night Chapel will be broadcastet live to the Web. Do you think this link is uninteresting to the community of wikipedia?

It's simple enough: no adverts on wikies, so no competitors. If you want to buy some adv, there is plenty of it on the Internet. Please note that also other sites insistently "offering" something have been removed and will not be tolerated on Wikipedia. Ah, just a note: the IP address class you've been writing is the same that provoked the blacklisting. --M/ 23:36, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

My IP address is one of "inode", the second largest provider of Austria, so what do you mean with your note?

So, for how long will be a domain on the spam blacklist? I am not conscious me of any debt. Is it fair to block the website for the next years because of one person did not keep to the rules of wikipedia?

Need to be added

Redirect pages

these are clones of tinyurl.com

all.at
beam.at
been.at
bite.to
board.to
bounce.to
bowl.to
break.at
browse.to
change.to
chip.ms
connect.to
crash.to
cut.by
direct.at
dive.to
drink.to
drive.to
drop.to
easy.to
everything.at
fade.to
fanclub.ms
firstpage.de
fly.to
flying.to
forward.to
fullspeed.to
fun.ms
gameday.de
germany.ms
get.to
getit.at
hard-ware.de
hello.to
hey.to
hop.to
how.to
hp.ms
jump.to
kiss.to
listen.to
mediasite.de
megapage.de
messages.to
mine.at
more.at
more.by
move.to
musicpage.de
mypage.org
mysite.de
nav.to
notrix.at
notrix.ch
notrix.de
notrix.net
on.to
page.to
pagina.de
played.by
playsite.de
privat.ms
quickly.to
redirect.to
rulestheweb.com
run.to
scroll.to
seite.ms
shortcut.to
skip.to snap.to
soft-ware.de
start.at
stick.by
surf.to
switch.to
talk.to
tip.nu
top.ms
transfer.to
travel.to
turn.to
vacations.to
videopage.de
virtualpage.de
w3.to
walk.to
warp9.to
window.to
yours.at
zap.to
zip.to 

4.160.213.227 07:42, 27 November 2006 (UTC) (Betacommand on en.wiki)

Done. -- mzlla 21:10, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

I Need Help

Can someone remove the blacklisted hyperlink for Maxwell (singer). I am not sure how this happened but now I can't edit the article. Any help will be truly appreciated. --170.148.10.43 16:40, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Current case of spamming Judo-related articels

The IP 82.92.114.111 spams many wikipedia projects (more than 10 as I've counted so far) in all Judo-related articles with to http://www.judo-snijders.nl Though he/she has been asked to stop entering that link, he did continue to. I suggest addition of the given domain to the black-list. Thanks. --Chris 12:40, 8 December 2006 (UTC) (89.55.21.118 12:40, 8 December 2006 (UTC))

child-support-laws-state-by-state.com

Persistant spamming [159], [160], [161], [162], [163], [164], [165], [166] of child-support-laws-state-by-state.com on article Child support multiple shared Ip's. please black list Hu12 22:56, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

18 Speed Tranny

Both http://www.18speedtranny.com and http://www.myspace.com/18speedtranny have been added to Stoner rock around once a day (maybe more) since July 17, 2006. It is almost never the same IP twice and not an easily blockable range (68.0.0.0/8 is the best I can figure). Small sample of the first couple weeks with the one URL: [167][168][169][170] (there would have been more in the two weeks but it was placed in a different part of the article and not spotted for a while). These are with the other URL and have been done just in the first nine days of December:[171][172][173][174][175][176][177][178][179][180][181][182]. Basically around 90-95% of the edits to the article are spamming and reverting of spam. Thanks. Wknight94 23:47, 9 December 2006 (UTC)