Wikivoyage/Logo/2013/R1/v/Wikivoyage logo idea - Geographical zones with arrow 2.svg: Difference between revisions
m +1 vote - eligible on metawiki with 1+ edits - Vote through Wikivoyage/Logo/2013/R1/Gallery - Cutelect |
m +1 vote - eligible on metawiki with 1+ edits - Vote through Wikivoyage/Logo/2013/R1/Gallery - Cutelect |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
# [[User:NatiSythen|NatiSythen]] |
# [[User:NatiSythen|NatiSythen]] |
||
# [[User:Mess|Mess]] |
# [[User:Mess|Mess]] |
||
# [[User:Jalo|Jalo]] |
|||
Revision as of 08:07, 26 July 2013
Mystère Martin: The geographical zones - I thought about the geographical zones that divide the Earth and I associated them with the colour of the Wikimedia logo: blue (that is a cool colour) stand for the frigid zones, green (that recall the forests, or the nature) represent the temperate zones, and red (a warm colour) is the torrid zone. In order to give the idea of traveling around the world I added some arrows., Wikivoyage logo idea - Geographical zones with arrow 2.svg
Instructions
Any contributor registered on any Wikimedia Foundation project prior to May 31, 2013 is eligible to vote. The process will be using weighted voting to ensure fair representation to Wikivoyage contributors. Wikivoyage contributors include anyone who has made 50 mainspace edits to Wikivoyage prior to May 31, 2013.
If you vote for more than one logo, please vote for them in order of your preference. The first one you choose is your first choice; the second one, your second choice, and the third one is your third choice. Your votes will be tallied in that order.
This is not a secret ballot. Your choices are recorded in your contributions and are consequently publicly visible.
- Only votes by logged-in users are accepted.
- One vote per logo. Three votes in total.
- To vote manually, append the following text at the end:
# [[User:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|]]
Comments [edit]
The following conversation is taken from Wikivoyage/Logo 2013/Submissions#Option 38 - The geographical zones:
20 px rendering 
, 16 px rendering
This logo looks like the current logo that we are forced to change. I thought about the geographical zones that divide the Earth and I associated them with the colour of the Wikimedia logo: blue (that is a cool colour) stand for the frigid zones, green (that recall the forests, or the nature) represent the temperate zones, and red (a warm colour) is the torrid zone. In order to give the idea of traveling around the world i added an arrow in the second version. --Mystère Martin (talk) 16:39, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
- Nice logo, I like it. It's not easy to reproduce a globe without copying directly the MetaWiki globe. --Mess (talk) 17:47, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
- It's not bad, but I think we need a cleaner break from the current logo, if only to satisfy the WTO. LtPowers (talk) 19:45, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
- Nice logo that is a perfect link between the current voy logo e the wikimedia one. Despite Lt observation I don't see any kind of similarities with the WTO one. Maybe I would only apply some variation on the arrows that doesn't convince me too much. --Andyrom75 (talk) 06:45, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- I uploaded a new version with a better arrow, thinner and with rounded corners. Moreover, I think that my logo is very different from the WTO one, but it recalls the current logo that I've always liked. --Mystère Martin (talk) 09:04, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- I like 2.1 and 3. I would mix them. Add an arrow (don't know where :-) ...mayb in the same position) on 3, because I like the torsion, but without the arrow it seems "static". Try two version, one with the same arrow (the latest) and another one longer that would reach near the end of the globe on the opposite side. --Andyrom75 (talk) 14:03, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- I made the fourth version. These are the 20 px renderings:
and 
--Mystère Martin (talk) 14:34, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- I didn't say it looked like the WTO logo. I'm saying the WTO may not be satisfied that this logo is sufficiently different from the one to which they objected. LtPowers (talk) 20:06, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- I made the fourth version. These are the 20 px renderings:
- I like 2.1 and 3. I would mix them. Add an arrow (don't know where :-) ...mayb in the same position) on 3, because I like the torsion, but without the arrow it seems "static". Try two version, one with the same arrow (the latest) and another one longer that would reach near the end of the globe on the opposite side. --Andyrom75 (talk) 14:03, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- I uploaded a new version with a better arrow, thinner and with rounded corners. Moreover, I think that my logo is very different from the WTO one, but it recalls the current logo that I've always liked. --Mystère Martin (talk) 09:04, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Nice logo that is a perfect link between the current voy logo e the wikimedia one. Despite Lt observation I don't see any kind of similarities with the WTO one. Maybe I would only apply some variation on the arrows that doesn't convince me too much. --Andyrom75 (talk) 06:45, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- It's not bad, but I think we need a cleaner break from the current logo, if only to satisfy the WTO. LtPowers (talk) 19:45, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
