Bengali Wikipedia 10th Anniversary Celebration Kolkata/Submissions/ Utilizing Omnipotence Paradox for Re-Designing Examination biased Educational Life Cycle

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Submission no.
Title of the submission
Utilizing Omnipotence Paradox for Re-Designing Examination biased Educational Life Cycle
Type of submission
Tutorial
Author of the submission
Ketan Kapale
E-mail address
ketan.kapale@live.com | ketan.k@epapers.net.in
Username
Ketan.kapale
Country of origin
India (Marathi Community)
Affiliation, if any (organisation, company etc.)
CEO & Founder Epapers Inc.
Personal homepage or blog
www.ketankapale.com (official website for photography)
Abstract (at least 300 words to describe your proposal)

Studies have shown that an Intellectual, logical and competitive brain had always been useful in showcasing higher examination scores which helped people finding their desired excellence. Different people work in various sectors of quantitative, verbal and logical abilities to perfect themselves for scoring good grades in desired examinations, by extensive practices. People do focus themselves for attenuating higher Intelligent Quotient (IQ) and Emotional Quotient (EQ) levels (above average) for withstanding higher statistics and accountability for their credits. But there are certain loopholes to look after for all of the above parameters. Researchers have declared in late 1990’s that IQ varies and differs within time and EQ matters the most in requisite decision making abilities. Moreover the logic based abilities can be perfected by various practiced sessions and methods.

Hence, In this paper, we would like to report on ‘a stable and reliable resource’ by re-designing the conceptual framework of ‘Omnipotence Paradox’ for judging the exact intellectual brain score by sensing critical thinking pattern of statements which contradicts themselves and yet they can be true*

The goal of ‘Utilizing Omnipotence Paradox’ (UOP) is to gather comparable and synchronized data on ‘critical thinking analogy’ by using the combination of ‘general and specific issues’ for placing a pattern of answer from logically interlinked options. The data from every form of solution will be arranged in a sequential manner (graphically) in the form 16 sets of uniformed solutions, which will give an associative and generous thinking pattern of examinee by omitting all the trained and practiced approaches. This published work will be an advancement of traditional reference model for ‘paradoxes’ by confining an appropriate model and its required utilization for seeking the conditional responses above traditional thinking processes.

The question sets involved in the tests are the most common and daily used catch phrases for removing the age, education and understanding barriers. Every question will have 4 options and each option is sub-divided into two parts. Moreover every option and its relative sub-divisions are interlinked with each other forming a link pattern. The database will produce the ‘most permissible pattern link’ on which the ‘structural answer pattern’ will be judged. The ‘closest valuation’ obtained will strike with the highest credits and the ‘most distorted link’ will get the lowest negative values.

UOP will be published as a two volume work: The first volume will showcase the descriptive pattern of the work, along with the findings of the protocol utilized on 500 examinees and while the second volume will produce the software framework utilized with relative algorithms for producing the associative credit based evaluation schemes. Along with the rest of the volumes, an associative recorded copy with slide presentations of the program will also be given.

As in for now, this work is under prototype and still under pipeline and about 15 lecturers from various domains have joined to share their collaborative work. ( This is copyrighted and working as a pipeline module for an organization | All rights are reserved to the author)

Track
  • Education Outreach
Language of Track
English
Length of session (if other than 30 minutes, specify how long)
30 minutes
Will you attend Conference at Kolkata with own cost if your submission is not accepted?
Slides or further information (optional)
Special requests


Interested attendees[edit]

If you are interested in attending this session, please sign with your username below. This will help reviewers to decide which sessions are of high interest. Sign with a hash and four tildes. (# ~~~~).

  1. Add your username here.