Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2022

Inactive administrators as of 12 August 2022

Admin actions over the last six months can be checked using this tool.

Notes

• Inactive administrators have been notified via talk page message and email.
• CommonsDelinker, CommonsMaintenanceBot and KrinkleBot (no admin actions each) are exempt for being bot accounts.

-- CptViraj (talk) 18:47, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Inactive since last run

Follwing admins are subject to immediate removal.

@Krd: Please process. -- CptViraj (talk) 18:47, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

 Done --Krd 19:43, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Admin responses

Admins who have been queried about their adminship, please sign below. If you don't sign by 12 September 2022, 23:59:59 UTC, you will lose adminship automatically.

To confirm your adminship, sign here

• --Klemen Kocjančič (Pogovor - Quick response) 19:03, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
• --Leit (talk) 19:24, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
• --Jcornelius (talk) 20:15, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
• -- Rama (talk) 20:24, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
• -- 99of9 (talk) 22:27, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
• --Podzemnik (talk) 06:08, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
• --Mardetanha ^talk 06:25, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
• --Trijnstel_talk 20:52, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
• --Michelet-密是力 (talk) 06:08, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
• --Indeedous (talk) 13:35, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
• --miya (talk) 03:50, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

To resign your adminship, sign here

The interface-admin flag is enough for me. — putnik 12:11, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

@Putnik: Just to be clear: You resign adminship and like to keep IA per your signature. Is that correct? --Krd 14:32, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

@Krd, yes. — putnik 18:01, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

 Done --Krd 04:39, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

• Not available enough to keep the rights. Will ask to resign. Tomer T (talk) 08:39, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Results

• @Krd: Please process. -- CptViraj (talk) 05:08, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

  Four removed. --Krd 06:15, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

  I'm undecided regarding PierreSelim. They have been active as OS per Commons:Oversighters/Statistics, but this appears not to count as admin action per Commons:Administrators/De-adminship; and they appear not to have a notification on their talk page, which is a requirement ("must") per policy. Opinions? --Krd 06:15, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

  Actually, they were already notified. 1989 (talk) 16:04, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

  Thank you. I didn't see that this was send by Massmessage. --Krd 16:19, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

  Now also removed, plus meta:Special:Diff/23803122. --Krd 16:37, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

  @CptViraj and Krd: Please I was never notified of the discussion (even though as 1989 say I should have been because technically there was a message, but it was on meta and never here on Commons), I would have signed off. Moreover I have logged 25 oversighters action since the last 6 months per Oversighters/Statistics, thoses actions are possible only because I was a sysop too. If you can reconsider, --PierreSelim (talk) 08:40, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

  As 1989 said the notification is at: Special:Diff/681957432. Per policy (Commons:Administrators/De-adminship) I don't see any other possible outcome. --Krd 08:54, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

  I don't want to play on the policy but sincerely I would have expected a message on Commons. I find that a bit harsh but as you said it is what it is. --PierreSelim (talk) 09:03, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

  The mentioned difflink is a diff on your talk page at Commons. --Krd 09:42, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

  Thanks for correcting me, guess I'm just disappointed. I hold no grudge, this is on me. --PierreSelim (talk) 11:03, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

  i dont think this removal is logically sound. PierreSelim, having performed 24 "oversighters' actions" in June, was certainly not an inactive oversighter.

  logic:

  1. Commons:Oversighters: "Oversighters are administrators with the technical ability on Wikimedia Commons to hide (suppress) data so that it can no longer be seen by normal editors." -> an oversighter is a sysop.
  2. therefore, an active oversighter is an active sysop.
  3. PierreSelim was an active oversighter.
  4. therefore, PierreSelim was an active sysop.

  RZuo (talk) 13:52, 19 September 2022 (UTC)