克罗地亚语维基百科

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
This page is a translated version of the page Croatian Wikipedia and the translation is 42% complete.

克罗地亚语维基百科(简称hr-WP)是维基百科的语言版本之一。

概述和统计

开始于:2003年2月16日

創始者:???

现在的规模:219,938条目

总编辑次数:6,896,484

活跃的编辑者:过去一个月中有496人

Coverage

Croatian Wikipedia is generally regarded by the rest of the Wikimedia Movement as having significant neutrality issues, resulting from the capture of the project by politically-motivated editors who have driven out or blocked others,[1], but also more elegantly supressed liberal content and hyper-presented conservative nationalist and catholic.[2][3] Gizmodo describes its bias as "promoting fascism, whitewashing World War II concentration camps, as well as anti-Serbian and anti-LGBT propaganda".[4]

As of start of 2021, the situation is slowly improving but it is still periodically present in media as bad example.[5]

Areas of strength

  • Croatia and Croatians-related content, but also
    • Coverage of Christian and especially Catholic content
    • Coverage of football/soccer (and somewhat other sports) up to very low level leagues and players

Areas of weakness

  • Controversial political and historic topics, but also
    • Lack of diversity among contributors
    • Lack of updates on many pages from first decade and lack of criteria and regulations for many topic and work
    • Lack of coverage of modern and contemporary culture, civil society, women, as well as minorities and human rights[6]

Operation

挑战

  • Achieving neutrality on charged political topics
  • Preventing administrator abuse

竞争对手

历史和影响

里程碑/活动

  • 2013: Significant media attention and cultural debate in Croatia about the project's bias issues, and subsequent Meta RfC
  • 2020: Global ban proposal of hr-WP admin Kubura
  • 2021: 3 most problematic admins were removed by community in March (Roberta F. remained admin on sister projects). WMF comissioned and few months later published Croatian Wikipedia Disinformation Assessment, conducted by an anonymous academic researcher. Findings were confirming historic revisionism and problematic content bias on other of topics by removed admins

Prominent Wikipedians

参考资料