Grants:IdeaLab/Encourage new editors m/f

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IdeaLab beaker and flask.svg
Encourage new editors m/f
Many new editors are discouraged by curt contradiction and reversion; Wikipedia admins need to be encouraging.
Hex icon with lightning white.svg
idea creator
Afterbrunel
this project needs...
Hex icon with hand black.svg
volunteer
Hex icon with lightning black.svg
advisor
join
endorse
created on09:14, 12 March 2015 (UTC)


Project idea[edit]

What is the problem you're trying to solve?[edit]

New editors, especially those who put a high value on feelings as well as cold facts, are discouraged from persisting in Wikipedia by the behaviours of others.

What is your solution?[edit]

Many people put a significant value on their perception of others' attitude to them, as well as objective facts. Many editors of long standing are brusque and rude. When someone adds an edit that is not 100% accurate, it is offensive if someone else immediately adds "citation required" or reverts it. Imagine if a physical (paper-based) encyclopaedia encouraged some editors to annotate their colleagues work on public display with a comment that in effect says "This colleague's work is sloppy."

This kind of thing is encouraged by the use of "functions", where those who consider themselves superior can simply add a criticism inside double curly brackets. It is even worse when they use automated or semi-automated scripts without re-reading the result, often upsetting someone else's careful work simply based on a matter of opinion about style.

And finally, wouldn't it be good if Wikipedia admin people tried to be polite and encouraging, rather than treating editors who ask simple (perhaps naive) questions like naughty and unruly schoolchildren ... ?

Goals[edit]

Get Involved[edit]

Participants[edit]

Endorsements[edit]

Expand your idea[edit]

Do you want to submit your idea for funding from the Wikimedia Foundation?

Expand your idea into a grant proposal