Grants:IdeaLab/More than one Peer Review (avoiding too much backlog like DYK does)
What is the problem you're trying to solve?
Peer review is a great way for articles to solve big problems before being nominated for GA or FA status, however each editor only gets one
What is your solution?
I assume that this one-peer-review-per-editor policy is to reduce backlog. I propose that Peer Review uses DYK's strategy at reducing backlog, which is to require each user who requests a peer review to review another article.
I'm trying to make it easier on people, especially in FAC, to get articles to FA or GA status
Expand your idea
Do you want to submit your idea for funding from the Wikimedia Foundation?