Meta:Training/For educators/Training feedback
- What I liked
The videos were short, simple, and to the point.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
There seem to be at least two versions of the tutorial - one on Wikipedia and one on Wikimedia. I used the Wikimedia one, and it contained several broken or inaccurate links, which slowed things down a lot.
It would be helpful to learn how to navigate to "special" pages within Wikipedia.
- What was unnecessary
A lot of help pages and tutorials seem to exist in multiple versions and in different places. This is confusing for a new user.
--Josef Horáček (talk) 18:47, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Shuksan210 (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
- Very clear instructions for how to effectively integrate assignment into classroom.
...
- What I didn't like
- N/A
...
- What was missing
- N/A
...
- What was unnecessary
- N/A
...
--Shuksan210 (talk) 17:54, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
Very concise and informative; easily navigable (with some exceptions; see below)
- What I didn't like
Some of the links were broken or should have linked to Wikipedia instead of Wikimedia. Also the Regional Ambassador information is from 2013, so I'm guessing many of these folks are not who we should be contacting.
- What was missing
link to Special:Institutions
- What was unnecessary
The case study is worthwhile for those thinking of using Wikipedia in a graduate class, but for anyone else the assignment and level is too different for it to be more helpful than simply reading the Syllabus pdf manual.
--Ieremu (talk) 20:36, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Nolan Perry (talk)[edit]
- What I liked
The Orientation in General
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...