Movement Strategy/Recommendations/Iteration 3/Evaluate, Iterate, and Adapt/hi

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
This page is a translated version of the page Movement Strategy/Recommendations/Iteration 3/Evaluate, Iterate, and Adapt and the translation is 47% complete.
Outdated translations are marked like this.
Other languages:
मूल्यांकन करना, दोहराना और अनुकूलित करना
अन्य सिफारिशों के लिए संपर्क
अन्य सिफारिशों के लिए संपर्क

This recommendation proposes the idea of underpinning our Movement with continuous processes to analyze our ecosystems, raise awareness on their current state, and plan for our continued growth. It is foundational to all other recommendations, as, without analysis of where we are and how we do things, we cannot adjust and make changes to guarantee our future growth and sustainability.

क्‍या?
अपनी सामाजिक और तकनीकी प्रक्रियाओं और संरचनाओं को गतिशील रूप से दोहराने, अनुकूलित करने तथा उन्नत करने में सक्षम होने के लिए, हमें अपने आंतरिक और बाहरी लक्ष्यों की दिशा में निरंतर प्रगति करने की ज़रूरत है। यह हमें गतिशील संदर्भों में लचीला बनाए रखने तथा यह सुनिश्चित करने में सहायक होगा कि हमारे कार्यक्रम एवं कार्य अच्छी तरह से निर्देशित और [Special:MyLanguage/Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Recommendations/Principles#Efficiency
क्यों
क्यों

As we are planning to create or reorientate new structures and processes to reach our 2030 goals, we must develop comprehensive methods to evaluate whether the path we are taking is leading us in the right direction. Today, the Wikimedia Movement insufficiently evaluates its contents, programs, and processes, making it difficult to identify strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, preventing stakeholders from advancing towards both efficiency and impact.

To date, efforts to map and build capacity for Movement stakeholders have been ad hoc and un-sustained. The strategic direction requires new thinking, skills, and structures to build evidence-based best practices to document, sustain, and evaluate the progress or failures of programs, including for capacity building and skill development programs, over the long term.[1]

किस तरह
किस तरह

To overcome the current barriers to growth, we recommend an approach based on several actions. We must develop methodologies to account for meaningful learning and sharing of experiences across our Movement. These methodologies involve planning, evaluation, dissemination of results, and iterations of processes to improve our Movement direction.

Programmatic and project planning will include systematic evaluation as an integral part of the process, as preconditions to adapting to changing environments, and to the improvement of our overall work. Evaluation needs to be incorporated into decision-making at all institutional levels. Planning for adequate resources, skills development, and capacity needs will be necessary to create meaningful evaluation processes.

The evaluation processes should occur at and across all levels, to verify whether our work is making progress toward achieving our strategic goals. Evaluation processes should also be adapted to the capabilities of the different communities (i.e. not be time-consuming, easy to put in place, supported by resources). This process ends with the dissemination of knowledge. Any evaluation, iteration, and change must be stored in the knowledge management system, accessible and communicated to the entire Movement, in order to raise awareness, amplify its effects, and help others avoid duplication of efforts.

The results from the evaluation must be disseminated and discussed with all involved stakeholders. For example, verifying that an improvement in the registering process / user page creation has increased user retention in a particular language edition must be communicated to the corresponding language community. The results from the evaluation must provide the necessary data to understand the context and elements involved in the system or part of the system examined[2]. Including the people who may benefit from the change that is evaluated, whether it is the current community, new participants, or other groups of users, allows what was learned to be better understood with potentially greater impact within other projects who can learn from and adapt the results[3]. Every evaluation must be adapted to achieve its intended goals.

अपेक्षित परिणाम

मूल्यांकन:[4]

  • हमारे लक्ष्यों के आधार पर मूल्यांकन के लिए स्पष्ट मानदंड स्थापित करें: हमारे विकास तथा संपोषणीयता के लिए सभी स्तरों पर योजना तथा निर्णय लेने की सुगमता के लिए प्रभाव, समावेशी प्रयोक्ता अनुभव, लोक-केंद्रितता, एवं निष्पक्षता। [5]
  • विकिमीडिया आंदोलन में किन्हीं भी हितधारकों की परस्पर जवाबदेही स्पष्ट करने के लिए तंत्र स्थापित करें। [6]

पुनरावृत्ति:

  • आंदोलन में भागीदारी के मूल सिद्धांतों के रूप में विविधता तथा नवागंतुकों को शामिल करने का मूल्यांकन करके आंदोलन में निष्पक्षता लागू करने की प्रगति की निगरानी करें। [7][3]
  • यह सुनिश्चित करने के लिए कार्यनीतिक परिवर्तनों का मूल्यांकन करें कि हमारे द्वारा कार्यनीतिक अनुशंसाओं को लागू करते समय मौजूदा समुदायों तथा प्रोफाइल की भावी विविधता, दोनों को हमेशा ध्यान में रखा जाए।
  • दिए गए किसी भी क्षेत्र पर संसाधनों तथा विशेषज्ञों के साथ मूल्यांकन प्रदान करें। [8]
  • क्षमता निर्माण के लिए व्यापक मूल्यांकन प्रणाली का विकास करें जिससे हितधारकों को अपनी प्रगति समझने तथा अपने समावेशन में समर्थित महसूस करने में सुविधा हो। [8]
  • अनुसंधान और परीक्षण के जरिए मान्यता को बढ़ावा देने के लिए ऐसी प्रक्रियाओं को दोहराएँ जो प्रौद्योगिकी, नीतियों, तथा संचालन प्रणालियों में परिवर्तन का प्रस्ताव करें। [3]

अनुकूलनीयता:

  • नई और परिवर्तित स्थितियों और चुनौतियों का सामना करने के लिए ऐसी नीतियाँ और प्रक्रियाएँ अपनाएं, जो बदलती दुनिया और बदलते आंदोलन के मूल्यांकन पर आधारित हों।
  • हमारे द्वारा विकसित संरचनाओं एवं दृष्टिकोणों के लचीलेपन तथा अनुकूलन क्षमता को बढ़ाएं। [9]
  • सुधार, नवाचार और प्रभावी समायोजन के लिए योजना बनाएँ, बजट बनाएँ और अनुसंधान में निवेश करें। [3]
संदर्भ
संदर्भ
  1. ↑ Tanzania Strategy Salon, June 2019, Resource allocation thematic area, Catalan Strategy Salon, September 2019, Product and technology thematic area
  2. ↑ Egypt/Spain Strategy Salon community conversations, June 2019, Capacity Building thematic area
  3. ↑ a b c d Diversity R2: Reaching a self-aware and dynamic structure
  4. ↑ Community Survey Analysis: Resource Allocation: “numerous responses about accountability”.
  5. ↑ Partnerships R1: Provide the knowledge needed for understanding and solving global issues, Community Survey Analysis: Product & Technology, Q2, “gentle introduction of changes”, Diversity R2: Reaching a self-aware and dynamic structure, Roles & Responsibilities R1: All of this exists to support our primary purpose
  6. ↑ Roles & Responsibilities R6: Wikimedia Movement organisations
  7. ↑ Community Survey Analysis: Product & Technology, Q2, “gentle introduction of changes”
  8. ↑ a b Capacity Building R6: Evaluating Capacity Building
  9. ↑ Resource Allocation RF: Ensure flexible approach to resource allocation, Advocacy R2: Diversity
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Movement_Strategy/Recommendations/Iteration_3/Evaluate,_Iterate,_and_Adapt/hi&oldid=24666233"