Jump to content

Proposals for closing projects/Closure of Mongolian Wikibooks

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

The result of the following proposal for closing a WMF project is to CLOSE the project. Please, do not modify this page.

The following discussion is closed: Project to be closed per consensus. —Dferg (talk) 12:53, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Mongolian Wikibooks is absolutely empty, and the only activity is spam cleanup. -- Prince Kassad 14:20, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I think this request has been opened enough time, so if nobody objects, I propose to close this discussion in 2 days from now, that is to say, on Thursday, 23 of April.Dferg (talk) 10:01, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


  1. Support: no activity + spam + no contents + no community = no wikibooks. --OosWesThoesBes 14:24, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support closure -- no useful changes in the last 30 days other than spam clean-up by outsiders and no pages other than the main page. See wikibooks:mn:Special:Allpages and wikibooks:mn:Special:Recentchanges . --A. B. (talk) 15:01, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support --MF-Warburg(de) 15:10, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Jaranda | wat's sup 02:31, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support — no activity or Community. --Agüeybaná (hábleme) 23:30, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Basically all I've seen in the last few months was Drini whacking the spambots/vandals. Nada. Sr13 20:45, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support Clearly non-viable projects should not only be closed, they should be deleted. Siebrand 15:59, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    We can open a request for deletion once the project is closed :) —Dferg (talk) 10:02, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support --Ilaria 07:11, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support only edits in the last few weeks were from bots; practically no human input. No community to speak of. Practically no content. Tempodivalse [☎] 23:00, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Support - no activity, no content for a long time. —Dferg (talk) 10:01, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


General comments