Research:The role of IBIS in Wikimedia

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Contact
Kenneth Holmes
Duration:  2011-9 — 2012-9+
GearRotate.svg

This page documents a research project in progress.
Information may be incomplete and change as the project progresses.
Please contact the project lead before formally citing or reusing results from this page.


Key Personnel[edit]

  • Kenneth Holmes- MFA Candidate, Design Management at the Savannah College of Art and Design

Project Summary[edit]

My name is Ken Holmes and I am a MFA Candidate in Design Management at the Savannah College of Art and Design in Savannah, Georgia. I am currently beginning my thesis work which will be looking to create a "design framework" by which an argumentation mapping method called IBIS (Issue Based Information System) could thrive in Wikimedia products, helping to develop the communities and brand along vision, mission, and strategy directions. Below you will find my working thesis statement, statement of purpose, and bibliography, all of which will undergo changes as the thesis develops. Currently I am scanning for pertinent literature to build my literature review.

Methods[edit]

Currently methodology is not set and will not be approachable till completion of a literature review. However the work that we do within the Design Management program of study is based in user centered design, thus there will most likely be an ethnographic approach taken for primary research methods. This may or may not involve the Wikimedia/Wikipedia community.

Dissemination[edit]

The standing of dissemination will remain to be seen as school requirements for submission and publication might conflict with the spirit of open access publishing. Currently no resources that would require open access publication are being used. It is my intent to make this thesis and its findings public and publish them.

Benefits for the Wikimedia community[edit]

The output will be a strategy that will help Wikimedia reach is goals for 2015 as outlined in the Strategy Wiki.


Current Guiding Statements[edit]

Envisioning IBIS in the Wikimedia Foundation: a design strategy.


Working Thesis Statement

Wikipedia emerged on the Internet as a crowd-sourced, collaboratively created encyclopedia that anyone, at any time, could add to and edit. However as the encyclopedia has matured in community and as a destination on the Internet, it is no longer the singular mission and vision of the Wikimedia Foundation, the organization that maintains the site.



Wikimedia’s current vision is to “Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge.” [1] This is embodied in the following mission statement: “The mission of the Wikimedia Foundation is to empower and engage people around the world to collect and develop educational content under a free license or in the public domain, and to disseminate it effectively and globally....”[2]



Currently Wikipedia is the fifth most visited entity on the web. It has emerged as an extremely powerful broker of factual information after sites such as Google and Yahoo, and the content holders Facebook and YouTube. And yet the Foundation has identified challenges in critical areas concerning sustaining community collaboration, creating more credible influence, growing readership and reach, fostering innovation, and the very generation of knowledge on the site itself. What is clear to them is that in dealing with these challenges the future may not look at all like the past. This attitude is reflected in their vision and mission statement; and yet any change, let alone innovation, may be difficult to diffuse due to an diverse community size of over 100,000 editors.


Issue Based Information System (IBIS), is an argumentation notation method designed to reduce the social complexity of issue focused collaboration. IBIS may be key to creating a more sustainable future for Wikipedia and the Wikimedia Foundation that meets its vision, mission, and recently articulated strategic goals. With the right design strategy, IBIS can be integrated into a Large Scale Argumentation System (LSAS), a technology that works with IBIS to bring focus in participation. With this strategy IBIS along with LSAS could attend to an environment of crowd sourced collective intelligence such as the Wikipedia community.



Working Statement of Purpose

This thesis will create a design framework that will support the grafting of Large Scale Argumentation and its underlying IBIS methodology as a valuable innovation to the brands and communities of the Wikimedia Foundation.



Using the MIT Center for Collective Intelligence’s current LSAS system (sometimes referred to as the Deliberatorium) as a starting point, the thesis will create a roadmap for understanding the opportunity, specifically for the communities of practice in Wikipedia, and create a vision and adoptable strategy for the diffusion of IBIS and/or LSAS technology to the Wikipedia/media multi-brand platform.



This will be done with careful attention to current Wikimedia strategic activities and challenges with the intention of supporting those activities, as well as uniquely contributing to growth and sustainability for the current community and brand.



Finally the work of this thesis will frame how the potential seen in the research can be reached. Elucidating a strategy not simply for diffusion of an IBIS system but for the initial momentum and seeding of the relationships between the potential stakeholders so that the actual work of creating that system may be possible; with the expectation that the larger challenge in gaining support is found with the communities of Wikimedia and Wikipedia.


Research Questions


  1. What is the value of integrating IBIS and Large Scale Argumentation into the Wikimedia Foundation, its flagship project Wikipedia, the chapters that have formed over time, and the Wikimedia “community?”
  2. What are the conceptual frameworks used to describe the issues faced by the projects and their communities? Are there other frameworks to be aware of that are not represented within the internal community discourse?
  3. How could an IBIS based system be integrated to create sustainable practices and futures for the community and its projects such as Wikipedia, specifically addressing issues identified in the Wikimedia Strategy Research and 2010-15 Strategic Plan?
  4. How could LSAS/IBIS system be envisioned and introduced to the community so that the adoption and diffusion of the systems occur and support the larger mission and objectives of the Foundation?
  1. What could such a system look like in the community interaction?
  2. Are there multiple ways in which the adoption and diffusion could occur, and this multiple strategies that could be developed?
  3. How could the stakeholders be engaged and brought to the table to work on this?


Bibliography

This is a working bibliography that comprises my current literature scan, and is a wide shot at creating the base that this thesis work will stand on. This will be sifted and reduced during the process of critique and review of the literature. What I am finding is that a vast majority of the information that looks useful in terms of understanding the collaboration gene in the Wikipedia community will be in academic papers and sources. This is partially framed not just by the young age of Wikipedia but that a cursory review of the literature shows post 2005-07 editor communities and their interactions dramatically changed.


  1. Aaron Halfaker, Aniket Kittur, Robert Kraut, John Riedl. "A Jury of Your Peers: Quality, Experience and Ownership in Wikipedia." In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration, 1-10. Orlando, Florida: ACM, 2009.
  2. Adrian Groza, Sergiu Indrie. "Enacting Social Argumentative Machines in Semantic Wikipedia." Ubiquitous Computing and Communication Journal, no. Special Issue on RoEduNet (January 2011 2011): 672-80.
  3. Ali Gürkan, Luca Iandoli, Mark Klein, Giuseppe Zollo. "Mediating Debate through on-Line Large-Scale Argumentation: Evidence from the Field." Information Sciences 180, no. 19 (2010): 3686-702.
  4. Andrea Baldassarri, Alain Barrat, Andrea Capocci, Harry Halpin, Ulrike Lehner, Jose Ramasco, Valentin Robu, Dario Taraborelli. "The Berners-Lee Hypothesis: Power Laws and Group Structure in Flickr." In Social Web Communities, edited by Steffen Staab Harith Alani, Gerd Stumme. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings. Dagstuhl, Germany: Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, 2008.
  5. Andrea, Forte. "Scaling Consensus: Increasing Decentralization in Wikipedia Governance." 2008.
  6. Aniket Kittur, Bongwon Suh, Bryan A. Pendleton, Ed H. Chi. "He Says, She Says: Conflict and Coordination in Wikipedia." In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 453-62. San Jose, California, USA: ACM, 2007.
  7. Barabási, A.L. Linked: The New Science of Networks. Perseus Publications, 2002.
  8. Bongwon Suh, Gregorio Convertino, Ed H. Chi, Peter Pirolli. "The Singularity Is Not Near: Slowing Growth of Wikipedia." In WikiSym '09. Orlando, Florida, 2009.
  9. Bryant, Susan L., Andrea Forte, and Amy Bruckman. "Becoming Wikipedian: Transformation of Participation in a Collaborative Online Encyclopedia." In Proceedings of the 2005 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work, 1-10. Sanibel Island, Florida, USA: ACM, 2005.
  10. Buchanan, Richard. "Declaration by Design: Rhetoric, Argument, and Demonstration in Design Practice." Design Issues 2, no. 1 (1985): 4-22.
  11. ———. "Wicked Problems in Design Thinking." Design Issues 8, no. 2 (1992): 5-21.
  12. Bush, Vannevar. "As We May Think." The Atlantic, July 1945 1945.
  13. Chi, Ed H. "Model-Driven Research in Social Computing." Wikisym 2011, 2011.
  14. Conklin, E.J. Dialogue Mapping: Building Shared Understanding of Wicked Problems. Wiley, 2005.
  15. Conklin, Jeff. "Growing a Global Issue Base: An Issue-Based Approach to Policy Deliberation." Paper presented at the Directions and Implications of Advanced Computing; Conference on Online Deliberation, University of California, Berkeley, 2008.
  16. ———. "Making Sense of Fragmentary Information: Compendium and the Intelligence Community." Cognexus Institute, 2002.
  17. Crumlish, C., and E. Malone. Designing Social Interfaces. O'Reilly Media, 2009.
  18. Dan Cosley, Dan Frankowski, Sara Kiesler, Loren Terveen, John Riedl. "How Oversight Improves Member-Maintained Communities." In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 11-20. Portland, Oregon, USA: ACM, 2005.
  19. Dooley, Patricia L. "Wikipedia and the Two-Faced Professoriate." In Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration, 1-2. Gdansk, Poland: ACM, 2010.
  20. Ed H. Chi, Sean Munson, Gerhard Fischer, Sarah Vieweg, Cynthia Parr. "Advancing the Design of Technology-Mediated Social Participation Systems." Computer vol. 43, no. no. 11 (Nov. 2010 2010): pp. 29-35.
  21. "Editor Trends Study." Wikipedia, http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Editor_Trends_Study.
  22. Forte, Andrea, and Amy Bruckman. "Why Do People Write for Wikipedia? Incentives to Contribute to Open-Content Publishing." 2005.
  23. Foundation, Wikimedia. "Wikimedia Strategic Plan: A Collaborative Vision for the Movement through 2015." Wikimedia Foundation, 2011.
  24. Friedkin, Noah. "Social Cohesion." Annual Review of Sociology 30, no. 1 (2004): 409-25.
  25. Gloor, Peter. Coolfarming: Turn Your Great Idea into the Next Big Thing. AMACOM BOOKS, 2010.
  26. ———. Swarm Creativity: Competitive Advantage through Collaborative Innovation Networks. Oxford University Press, 2006.
  27. Gloor, Peter A., Jonas S. Krauss, Stefan Nann, Kai Fischbach, and Detlef Schoder. "Web Science 2.0: Identifying Trends through Semantic Social Network Analysis." SSRN eLibrary (2008).
  28. Group, Bridgespan. "Interview with Ed Chi (Researcher Studying Editing Patterns)." In, PDF, (2009). http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/strategy/a/a8/External_expert_Chi.pdf.
  29. "Handbook of Collective Intelligence." http://scripts.mit.edu/~cci/HCI/index.php?title=Main_Page.
  30. Iandoli, Luca. "Building Consensus in on-Line Distributed Decision Making: Interaction, Aggregation and the Construction of Shared Knowledge Consensual Processes." edited by Enrique Herrera-Viedma, José García-Lapresta, Janusz Kacprzyk, Mario Fedrizzi, Hannu Nurmi and Slawomir Zadrozny. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, 339-55: Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, 2011.
  31. "Interviews/Summary of Interviews." Wikimedia Foundation, http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Interviews/Summary_of_interviews.
  32. Iyad, Rahwan. "Mass Argumentation and the Semantic Web." Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 6, no. 1 (2008): 29-37.
  33. Jeff Conklin, Clarence Ellis, Lynn Offermann, Steve Poltrock, Albert Selvin, Jonathan Grudin. "Towards an Ecological Theory of Sustainable Knowledge Networks." 1998.
  34. Jerome A. Feldman, Daniel Lee, David Thaw. "Computer, Social, and Neural Networks." Paper presented at the Directions and Implications of Advanced Computing; Conference on Online Deliberation, University of California, Berkeley, June 26 - 29, 2008 2008.
  35. Jesus, Rut. "What Cognition Does for Wikis." In Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration, 1-4. Gdansk, Poland: ACM, 2010.
  36. Joachim Kimmerle, Johannes Moskaliuk, Ulrike Cress. "Understanding Learning: The Wiki Way." In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration, 1-8. Orlando, Florida: ACM, 2009.
  37. Joseph Michael Reagle Jr., Lawernce Lessig. Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia. MIT Press, 2010.
  38. Kittur, Aniket, and Robert E. Kraut. "Harnessing the Wisdom of Crowds in Wikipedia: Quality through Coordination." In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, 37-46. San Diego, CA, USA: ACM, 2008.
  39. Klein, Mark. "Achieving Collective Intelligence Via Large-Scale Argumentation." In Collective Intelligence: Creating a Prosperous World at Peace, edited by Mark Tovey. 475-83. Oakton, Virginia: Earth Intelligence Network, 2008.
  40. ———. "Achieving Collective Intelligence Via Large-Scale on-Line Argumentation." In MIT SLOAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT WORKING PAPER 4647-07, 2007.
  41. ———. "How to Harvest Collective Wisdom on Complex Problems: An Introduction to the Mit Deliberatorium."
  42. Kolko, J. Thoughts on Interaction Design. Elsevier Science & Technology, 2011.
  43. Lam, Shyong K., and John Riedl. "Is Wikipedia Growing a Longer Tail?" In Proceedings of the ACM 2009 international conference on Supporting group work, 105-14. Sanibel Island, Florida, USA: ACM, 2009.
  44. Lindsay, Brooks. "Creating "the Wikipedia of Pros and Cons"." In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration, 1-2. Orlando, Florida: ACM, 2009.
  45. Liu, Jun, and Sudha Ram. "Who Does What: Collaboration Patterns in the Wikipedia and Their Impact on Data Quality." 19th Workshop on Information Technologies and Systems, pp. 175-180, December 2009 (2009).
  46. Malone, Thomas W., Robert Laubacher, and Chrysanthos N. Dellarocas. Harnessing Crowds: Mapping the Genome of Collective Intelligence. SSRN, 2009.
  47. Matei, Sorin Adam, and Caius Dobrescu. "Wikipedia's “Neutral Point of View”: Settling Conflict through Ambiguity." The Information Society 27, no. 1 (2010/12/30 2010): 40-51.
  48. Moggridge, B. Designing Interactions. MIT Press, 2007.
  49. Moss, Michael. "Strategies for Retaining, Recording and Sharing Knowledge at Rolls-Royce." 2008.
  50. Nemoto, Keiichi, Peter Gloor, and Robert Laubacher. "Social Capital Increases Efficiency of Collaboration among Wikipedia Editors." In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia, 231-40. Eindhoven, The Netherlands: ACM, 2011.
  51. O’Grady, James K. "Wicked Problems? Wicked Answers! Initiating Innovative Culture in Organizations." In NCIIA 12th Annual Meeting, 2008.
  52. Onnela, Jukka-Pekka, and Felix Reed-Tsochas. "Spontaneous Emergence of Social Influence in Online Systems." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107, no. 43 (2010): 18375-80.
  53. Paul Arthur Kirschner, Simon J. Buckingham Shum, Chadd Carr. "Dialog Mapping: Reflections on an Industrial Strength Case Study." Chap. Chapter 6 In Visualizing Argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-Making. Springer, 2003.
  54. Peter Gloor, Cooper, S.M. Coolhunting: Chasing Down the Next Big Thing. AMACOM, 2007.
  55. Raskin, J. The Humane Interface: New Directions for Designing Interactive Systems. Addison-Wesley, 2000.
  56. Rith, Chanpory, and Hugh Dubberly. "Why Horst W. J. Rittel Matters." Design Issues 23, no. 1 (2007/01/01 2006): 72-91.
  57. Saffer, D. Designing for Interaction: Creating Innovative Applications and Devices. New Riders, 2009.
  58. Shum, Simon. "Cognitive Dimensions of Design Rationale." In People and Computers, edited by N. V. Hammond D. Diaper. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
  59. Simon J. Buckingham Shum, Albert M. Selvin, Maarten Sierhuis, Jeffrey Conklin, Charles B. Haley, Bashar Nuseibeh. "Hypermedia Support for Argumentation-Based Rationale: 15 Years on from Gibis and Qoc." In Technical Report KMI-05-18: Knowledge Media Institute, 2005.
  60. Thomas W. Malone, Robert Laubacher, Josh Introne, Mark Klein, Hal Abelson, John Sterman, Gary Olson. "The Climate Collaboratorium: Project Overview." MIT Center for Collective Intelligence, 2009.
  61. Vora, Parul, Naoko Komura, and Stanton Usability Team. "The N00b Wikipedia Editing Experience." In Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration, 1-3. Gdansk, Poland: ACM, 2010.
  62. Wales, Jimmy. "Wikipedia: Social Innovation on the Web." WEB DESIGNS FOR INTERACTIVE LEARNING CONFERENCE, June 15–18, 2005 Ithaca, New York, 2005.
  63. Wasserman, S., and K. Faust. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, 1994.



External links[edit]

Contacts[edit]

Kenneth Holmes

holmes.kenneth@gmail.com