Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2017/Sources/Cycle 2/Swedish Wikipedia

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Information[edit]

What group or community is this source coming from?

name of group Swedish Wikipedia
virtual location (page-link) or physical location (city/state/country) Swedish Wikipedia's Village pump
Location type (e.g. local wiki, Facebook, in-person discussion, telephone conference) Local wiki - Village pump
# of participants in this discussion (a rough count) 12

Summary[edit]

Theme key
  1. Healthy, inclusive communities
  2. The augmented age
  3. A truly global movement
  4. The most trusted source of knowledge
  5. Engaging in the knowledge ecosystem
Questions key
  1. What impact would we have on the world if we follow this theme?
  2. How important is this theme relative to the other 4 themes? Why?
  3. Focus requires tradeoffs. If we increase our effort in this area in the next 15 years, is there anything we’re doing today that we would need to stop doing?
  4. What else is important to add to this theme to make it stronger?
  5. Who else will be working in this area and how might we partner with them?


Line Theme (refer to key) Question (refer to key) Summary Statement Keywords
1 A 1 Hard to argue againt. It is a pre-condition and absolutely necessary in order to achieve our primary goals. We need more participants in order to increase diversity and the quality of our projects. pre-condition
2 A 2 This is the most important goal as it is an enabler for other goals. priority
3 A 5 It is the responsibility of the community. community
4 B 1 The technical development is a factor the Wikimedia projects have to follow, in order not to be irrelevant. irrelevance
5 B 1 Wikipedia should not be a playground for experiment with new technologies. no playground
6 B 1 Better compatibility between existing content and modern platforms, e.g. infoboxes on mobile devices. compatibility
7 B 1 Without an advanced technical development, primarily through database and serach technology and new presentations, the wiki projects will decommission themselves. decommission
8 B 1 Are we prepared for a situation where more people are searching via audio instead of text? search
9 C 1 We have to spread knowledge not only in our neighbourhood, but also in areas of the world where it isn't so easy to create their own language versions. knowledge
10 C 1 The strength of Wikipedia is many language versions, the global focus and readers all over the world. strength
11 C 2 This is important when we disseminate the funds, so that development is done for all languages. dissemination
12 C 2 Not important for everyone to feel to be part of an international community. community
13 D 1 Wikipedia and the other projects will be sources in other more complex clusters of information. information
14 D 1 We need a clear mission with very strict and high standard of quality and content. quality.
15 D 1 There is a contradiction between high quality and low barriers for newcomers. contradiction
16 D 1 There are risks with inviting experts to contribute, as they might not accept that amateurs change their texts. risk
17 D 2 Scientists and scientific publications should be the most respected sources of knowledge, not Wikipedia. But we should come close and make the knowledge more easily accessible. easily accessible
18 D 2 We shall give an overview in all topics, not replace scientific litterature. overview
19 E 1 This will also in the future be the consequence of our quality. quality
20 E 1 We can play a political role for spreading information, by our attendance we contribute to hollow out national and traditional barriers for dissemiation of information, e.g. freedom of panorama. political
21 E 2 This is where Wikipedia has its place, among all other, if not necessarily free, but at least open knowledge sources. place
22 E 2 This is very important and our primary goal. primary goal
23 E 3 With more focus on theme A, it will also be easier to disseminate our common leisure time, so that we get time to take care of the various ways of collaborations when they occur. leisure time
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40

If you need more lines, you can copy them from Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2017/Sources/Lines.

Detailed notes (Optional)[edit]

If you have detailed notes in addition to the summary, you may add them here. For example, the notes may come from an in-person discussion or workshop. If your discussion happened on a wiki or other online space, you do not need to copy the detailed notes here.