Talk:Licensing update/License comparison

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Translations possible?[edit]

Is this ready for translation or is it not planned for translation? --Nux (talk) 07:00, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

I'm fairly sure that the comparison is completed. May as well begin translating; thanks for any help. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 07:05, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Then again. I'll try and check with Cbrown. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 07:07, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
  • I've received confirmation that would suggest that the page is not finalised. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 12:48, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Is this page ready for translations or not?--Seha 20:18, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

It's ready to go :-) --Eloquence 20:34, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Danke Erik :-) --Seha 20:38, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Open file formats query[edit]

See Talk:Licensing update#Open file formats query - courtesy link to a question about this page's table. FT2 (Talk | email) 23:14, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

101這名怎麼來的,先說我只是想讓人知道,這臺灣響魊國際的地上建築物,真正的功能應該怎麼啟動,讓當初與會人員知道,我舉個例 兵器乃兇器一樣都是傷人的,差別在那?使用者嗎?,一者存私心用一者公器不帶個人情緒波動,地表上聳立者誰也不能私藏,相信很多人都去試過,這傳賢不傳子,有本事就是你的,"江山待有人才出" 國之重器,翻成白 話,黯夜版 大陸也一套,這是同一個時間點交辦出去的,上海市那"霸企大樓"也就國際商戰時分左右手各持一把,一主攻一主守,平時就擺者,可它的權限很恐怖!部會首長以下,可先打了再找理由,包含部長,這五院院長有決策過,并認可之人,所以當確定一人後,就開始找下一個十年,"十年一大運 誰主浮沉" 今天中華民國107,03,14發表,我會讓它發展到一個極致,有機會的話,先交辦兩件事,{立院得在下個會期,將委員,議員以及國家發包工程暫定公務人員一律納入財物申報法裡, 再來臺灣海域將對外開放,歡迎國際經商旅遊背包客或航海家到臺灣運補,將採落地簽證。前提是有委員擬草...我就是要知道能不能用! 工欲善其事,必先利其器

A85608955 (talk) 13:11, 14 March 2018 (UTC)