Talk:Requests for new languages/Wikiversity Japanese 2

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

I do not know much in Japanese. I cannot understand the action of user: This is a discussion, not a vote. The comments that she has removed are valid opinions, whether you agree with it or not. Hillgentleman 02:36, 15 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Well it needs a Checkuser on those user the IP removed to validate his/her claims..--Cometstyles 02:38, 15 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The langcom counts only arguments and not votes and so "which particular person has authored which comment" and checking userage is fundamentally irrelevant. Hillgentleman 02:45, 15 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

note: Japaneasy, Kentaro, Workurban are sockpuppets (CU response)--Nick1915 - all you want 13:16, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
This is what my action is based on. If I've read this incorrectly, feel free to undo my edits. If you do, please check to make sure you are not accidentally placing back (and thus accidentally endorsing) defamatory statements. Pathoschild and TangoTango were going to check that more thoroughly this weekend. -- 03:22, 15 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Some of the sock comments seem fairly innocuous, but there's also some outright slander in what was removed. You might decide to remove some comments and keep the rest. I'd be fine with that. -- 03:40, 15 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

That is my point. It is bad (and not assuming good faith) to remove comments that way. I was simply reverting a bad edit; I was not endorsing anything. Note also that such indiscriminatory action may even have changed the thread structure (in removing a comment that has replies) and flow of the arguments. Hillgentleman 09:17, 15 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
A CU result alone in no way supports removing comments. As I have said, only arguments and not votes are counted in this discussion. Hillgentleman 09:24, 15 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I believe that your reasoning is essentially correct. My major concern was to ensure that defamatory content was removed on the shortest possible notice, and I was hoping that people who speak better Japanese would be able to undelete non-defamatory content over the weekend. I see that it will be very difficult to obtain consensus for that approach. :-/

Well, I did my best, at least. :-) -- 10:19, 15 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

traduction of some word[edit]

To better prepare the opening of the wikiversity, here are the words to be translated :

  • Wikiversity :
  • Wikiversity Talk:

Crochet.david 17:43, 15 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In the Japanese Wikipedia,
  • Wikipedia: → Wikipedia:
  • Wikipedia Talk: → Wikipedia‐ノート:
So I think that the best words are the following words.--Genppy 00:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Wikiversity: → Wikiversity:
  • Wikiversity Talk: → Wikiversity‐ノート: