Talk:WikiLanguageSaver

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Wiki LanguageSaver[edit]

So tell me...what does everyone think of this idea? I would gladly welcome and comments, support, and/or suggestions.

--Brandon A. Blosser 09:50, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Sounds great — but how about for ALL of the world's languages? Stevey7788 11:16, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

A "WikiVocab" project[edit]

I'd like to start a "WikiVocab" project if possible. Wiktionary currently has lists for around 200 languages, many of them in language-family rather than individual lists — see http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Category:Swadesh_lists. I have personally created and finished around 20 different Swadesh lists, with more coming on their way.

My dream is for there to be a 'big database' on the Internet where anyone can access the basic vocabulary words (in standardized topical lists) of all the world's languages. Wikipedia has information on the grammar and demographics of languages, but does not often include vocabulary, which is the core and essence of language. The closest things we have to a massive comparative database on world languages are the Austronesian Basic Vocabulary Database, Intercontinental Dictionary Series, and of course, Wiktionary's Swadesh lists. As a side note, even though this is basically the Rosetta Project's goal, the website is still quite unwieldy for ordinary users, has a very low Alexa site ranking, and does not allow wiki-style contributions. The Rosetta Project has also pulled off Swadesh lists that used to be on there, and does not have any searchable vocabulary databases as of now. And why do this? To help in language preservation, comparative linguistic studies, language learning, and more.

Or perhaps we can even create a separate "WikiVocab" website, similar in style to WikiSpecies! If we do create a big, unified, and searchable database for all the world's languages — all in one place — I believe it will be one of the greatest human achievements in modern times.

Thanks for your considerations! Stevey7788 11:15, 16 September 2010 (UTC)